Interpreting disaster science, defining its objectives and range

Authors

  • László TEKNŐS University of Public Service, Faculty of Law Enforcement, Institute of Disaster Management, 9-11 Hungária krt., H-1101, Budapest, Hungary. teknos.laszlo@uni-nke.hu https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0759-5871

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbambientum.2022.05

Keywords:

Disaster science, disaster risk management, discipline, disaster, hazard, risk.

Abstract

The article aims to define, interpret, and identify the aims of Disaster Science, and to delimit the individual components along the examination of its disciplinary nature. Definition of the concept of Disaster Science, delimitation of its individual components from its concept, and further terminological examination of related elements. On the one hand, this is conducted with the help of the Internet and the so-called keyword search method in the Google search engine, specifically by searching for definitions, then by collecting the individual publications and the relevant bodies and organisations, and analysing their use of terminology. The frequency of occurrence of disasters around the world is constantly increasing, their destructive effects can increasingly be felt. Their averting and elimination generally exceed the national level of protection, so the research results should be given priority. Among the conclusions of this publication stands the research priorities of Disaster Research having different disciplines, and due to its multi-, inter- and transdisciplinary nature, there is no unified consensus regarding the methodology and terms. The availability of literature of sociological origin is ensured, however, few works have been produced in Hungary on this topic, for instance, and even in the field of analysis of the effects of natural disasters. The Author analyses the elements of Disaster Science in an interdisciplinary manner, combining several disciplines, provides insight into Disaster Science and its research areas, and in terms of literary resources, the reader can get to know many, primarily international literature.

References

Araújo A. C., 2006, The Lisbon Earthquake of 1755–Public Distress and Political Propaganda. e-Journal of Portuguese History, 4, pp. 1–11.

Burton I., Kates R. W., White G. F., 1993, The Environment as Hazard, Guilford Press, 290 p. New York

Carr L. J., 1932, Disaster and the Sequence-Pattern Concept of Social Change. American Journal of Sociology, 38, pp. 207–218.

Dahlberg R., Rubin O., Vendelø M. T., 2016, Disaster Research: Multidisciplinary and International Perspectives. London, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 256 p.

Davidson R. A., 2015, Integrating Disciplinary Contributions to Achieve Community Resilience to Natural Disasters. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 32, pp. 55–67.

Dickinson C., Aitsi-Selmi A., Basabe P., Wannous C., Murray V., 2016, Global Community of Disaster Risk Reduction Scientists and Decision Makers Endorse a Science and Technology Partnership to Support the Implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 7, pp. 108–109.

Dilley M., Chen R. S., Deichmann U., Lerner-Lam A. L., Arnold M., 2006, Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis, World Bank, Washington DC, pp. 1-29.

Dúll A., Dósa Zs., 2005, The natural environment – in an environmental psychological approach. Tájökológiai Lapok, 3, pp. 19–25.

Etkin D., 2016, Disaster Theory: an Interdisciplinary Approach to Concepts and Causes, Elsevier, 386 p., Amsterdam.

Ferencz Z., Teknős L., 2020, Ways to Reduce Risks to People's Health and Life. In: Z. L. Antal; Z. Ferencz; A. Páldy (szerk.) Éghajlatváltozás és egészség [Climate Change and Health],129–156, Budapest.

Hetesi Zs., Kiss T., 2018, Human and nature. Way out of the impasse, University of Public Service, 78 p. Budapest.

Kelman I., 2006, Acting on Disaster Diplomacy. Journal of International Affairs, 59. pp. 215–240.

Kelman I., 2018, Lost for Words amongst Disaster Risk Science Vocabulary? International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 9, pp. 281–291.

Klein J. T., 1990, Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice, Wayne State University Press, 331 p. Detroit

Kopcsó I., Balázs R., 2016, Finding consensus on the scientific approach of standardized disaster research based on the Utstein Guidelines. Honvédorvos, 68, pp. 5–12.

Kuti R., Nagy Á., 2015, Weather Extremities, Challenges and Risks in Hungary. Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science, 14, pp. 299–306.

Mileti D. S., 1999, Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States, Joseph Henry Press, 371 p. Washington.

Miller T. R., Baird T. D., Littlefield C. M., Kofinas G., Chapin E. S., Redman C. L., 2008, Epistemological Pluralism: Reorganizing Interdisciplinary Research. Ecology and Society, 13, pp. 1-17.

Nel P., Righarts M., 2008, Natural Disasters and the Risk of Violent Civil Conflict. International Studies Quarterly, 52, pp. 159–185.

Pal I., von Meding J., Shrestha S., Ahmed I., Gajendran T., 2020, An Interdisciplinary Approach for Disaster Resilience and Sustainability, Springer, 535 p. Singapore.

Papp B., 2019, Disaster Risk Data and its Terminological Difficulties. A Statistical Review. Delta, VedeckoOdborný Časopis Katedry Protipožiarnej Ochrany, 13, pp. 5–21.

Papp B., 2020, Disaster Vulnerability as a Key Concept in Disaster Management – Terminological Review. Magyar Rendészet, 20, pp. 93–109.

Papp B., 2021, Study of models of co-operation in Southeast Asia used in the protection against natural disasters, adaptation opportunities for Hungary and Central Europe. PhD thesis. Doctoral School of Law Enforcement, Faculty of Law Enforcement, University of Public Service, 249. p. Budapest.

Papp B., 2022, The Main Theoretical Issues of Regional Disaster Management. In I. Kovács; L. Frigyer; T. Tirts (editor): Multidisciplinarity: the Diversity of Police Science, pp. 120–129. Budapest.

Peek I., Guikema S., 2021, Interdisciplinary Theory, Methods, and Approaches for Hazards and Disaster Research: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Risk Analysis, 41, pp. 1047–1058.

Perry R. W., Quarantelli E. L. (eds.), 2005. What is a Disaster? New Answers to Old Questions. Xlibris, 442 p. Philadelphia.

Quarantelli E. L. (eds.), 1998, What is a Disaster? A Dozen Perspectives on the Question. London, Routledge, 326 p.

Prince S. H., 1920, Catastrophe and Social Change. PhD thesis, Columbia University, 151 p., New York.

Rodríguez H., Quarantelli E.L., Dynes R. (eds.), 2007, Handbook of Disaster Research. Springer, 661 p. New York.

Ruffman C. D., Howell A. (eds.), 1994, Ground Zero: a Reassessment of the 1917 Explosion in Halifax Harbour. Nimbus Publishing Ltd. – St. Mary's University, 484 p.

Scanlon T. J., 1998, Disaster’s Little Known Pioneer: Canada’s Samuel Henry Prince. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 6, pp. 213–232.

Shi P., 1991, Theory and Practice of Disaster research. Journal of Nanjing University, 11, pp. 37–42.

Shi P., 2005, Theory and Practice on Disaster System Research in a Fourth Time. Journal of Natural Disasters, 14, pp. 1–7.

Shi P., Lu L., Wang J., Chen W., 2014, Disaster System: Disaster Cluster, Disaster Chain and Disaster Compound. Journal of Natural Disasters, 23, pp. 1–12.

Shi P., Ye T., Wang Y., Zhou T., Xu W., Du J., Wang J., Li N., Huang C., Liu L., Chen B., Su Y., Fang W., Wang M., Hu X., Wu J., He C., Zhang Q., Ye Q., Jaeger C., Okada N., 2020, Disaster Risk Science: A Geographical Perspective and a Research Framework. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11, pp. 426–440.

Siedlok F., Hibbert P., 2014, The Organization of Interdisciplinary Research: Modes, Drivers and Barriers. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16, pp. 194–210

Teknős L., Debreceni K. A., 2022, Disaster Management Aspects of Global Climate Change. In: A. Molnár; D. Wenczel (eds.) Third International Conference on Effective Response: Conference Proceedings. Budapest, Hungarian Red Cross pp. 45-55.

Uitto J. I., Shaw R., 2016, Sustainable Development and Disaster Risk Reduction, Springer, 287 p. Tokyo

United Nations: Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. Geneva, UNISDR, 2015.

White G. F., 1978, Natural Hazards and the Third World: A Reply. Human Ecology, 6, pp. 229–231.

Wisner B., Blaikie P., Cannon T., Davis I., 1994, At Risk Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters. Oxford, 134 p. Routledge,

Downloads

Published

2023-12-05

How to Cite

TEKNŐS, L. (2023). Interpreting disaster science, defining its objectives and range. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Ambientum, 67(1-2), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbambientum.2022.05