Oral Presentations Abstracts: USING GOALS OF CARE CONVERSATIONS TO BUILD ETHICS COMPETENCY

Authors

  • Nico NORTJE hD, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America. E-mail: nortjenico@gmail.com

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbbioethica.2021.spiss.91

Abstract

View of Volume 66, Special Issue, September 2021

Literature indicates that 99% of clinicians believe that timely Goals of Care (GOC) conversations are important. However, only 11% of patients report having had GOC conversations with their providers throughout the trajectory of their disease. Congruent to this, it is reported that only 41% of patients feel that they have received care consistent with their preferences. One can therefore deduct that there is a great ethical gap in how patients are approached by healthcare providers, especially respecting their autonomous decision-making.

As a concept, GOC refers to discussing patients’ therapy intend, which is informed by the patients’ hope, fears, information preferences, presumed minimally acceptable quality of life, and expectations for their future. Therefore it needs to be an explicit conversation which is personalized to each patient’s context and circumstances. Within these conceptual ideas there are a myriad of ethical values which needs to be addressed.

The author will explain how a Goals of Care initiative was started at the hospital where the author is a clinical ethicist and how these interactions with various members of the care team have been used to build ethics competencies of all the members of the care team. This innovative approach has been applauded by the participants for making ethics practical and applicable.

The structure of the talk will focus on basic literature review, discussion on initiative (how it was set up), challenges, lessons learnt, value in ethics competency development.

Published

2021-09-15

How to Cite

NORTJE, N. (2021). Oral Presentations Abstracts: USING GOALS OF CARE CONVERSATIONS TO BUILD ETHICS COMPETENCY. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Bioethica, 66(Special Issue), 139. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbbioethica.2021.spiss.91