RESEARCH MISCONDUCT IN MEDICAL SCIENCES

Authors

Keywords:

medicine, research, misconduct, incidence, prevention

Abstract

Research misconduct is widespread phenomenon, which in medicine can potentially harm people. Its prevention includes educating researchers, promoting authors integrity and ethics, lowering academic pressure, creating and obeying norms, but also inspection for plagiarism or fraud. Scientific misconduct is a widespread phenomenon, belonging to the category of irresponsible research of inappropriately performed or published studies (12, 17). By producing unreliable results, wrong decisions are made, resources wasted, people harmed or killed and environment endangered. Thus, it is important to prevent and uncover scientific misconduct and to promote scientific honesty (5). Responsible research encourages general trust in science and scientists (7). One of the most problematic fields regarding research misconduct seems to be medical science (2, 17). Contemporary medicine is evidence-based, meaning that every decision in medicine should be supported by scientific proof. The explosion of medical writing can be partially explained by scientific progress and new technologies being applied in diagnostics and patient treatment. Still, when investigated more thoroughly, besides original papers, a significant number of publications in medical journals can be classified as some type of research misconduct (2, 19).

Conduita greșită în cercetarea medicală. Conduita necorespunzătoare în cercetare este un fenomen foarte răspândit, care, în medicină, poate afecta oamenii. Prevenția acesteia include educarea cercetătorilor, promovarea integrității autorilor și a eticii, scăderea presiunii academice, crearea și ascultarea de norme, dar, de asemenea, investigarea actelor de plagiat și a fraudei.

 Cuvinte-cheie: medicină, cercetare, conduită necorespunzătoare, incidență, prevenție

References

Adibi P, Kianpour M, Shirani S. Investigating the Root Causes of Duplicate Publication in Research Articles. J Educ Health Promot 2015; doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.154023

Avula J, Avula H. Authors, Authorship Order, the Moving Finger Writes. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2015;19:258-262

Bedi N. Medical Research Misconduct Need Regulatory Reforms. Indian J Community Med 2014; 39:194–196

Bornman L. Research Misconduct – Definitions, Manifestations and Extent. Publications 2013;1:87-89

Fanelli D, Costas R, Lariviere V. Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity. Plos One 2015; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127556.

Fanelli D. How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data. Plos One 2009; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.

Forsmann B. An Ethical Analysis of the Phenomenon of Misconduct in Research. Acta Oncologica 1999;38:107-110

Hayter M, Noyes J, Perry L, Pickler R, Roe B, Watson R. Who Writes, Whose Rights, and Who's Right. Issues in Authorship? J Adv Nurs 2013;69:2599-601

Horner J, Minifie FD. Research Ethics III: Publication Practices and Authorship, Conflicts of Interest, and Research Misconduct. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2011;54:S346-362

Juyal D, Thawani V, Thaledi S. Plagiarism: An Egregious Form of Misconduct. N Am J Med Sci 2015;7:77–80

Komic D, Marusic SL, Marusic A. Research Integrity and Research Ethics in Professional Codes of Ethics: Survey of Terminology Used by Professional Organizations Across Research Disciplines. Plos One 2015; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133662

Mandal M, Bagchi D, Ranjan Basu S. Scientific Misconducts and Authorship Conflicts: Indian Perspective. Indian J Anaesth 2015;59:400-405

Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R. Scientists Behaving Badly. Nature 2005;435:737-738

Masic I. Plagiarism in Scientific Research and Publications and How to Prevent It. Mater Sociomed 2014;26:141–146

Rajasekaran S, Shan RL, Finnoff JT. Honorary Authorship: Frequency and Associated Factors in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Articles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:418-428

Schoenherr JR. Social Cognitive Barriers to Ethical Authorship. Front Psychol 2015 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00877

Sculier JP. Bad Behaviours Regarding Research and Scientific and Medical Publication. Rev Med Brux 2013;34:491-499

Shamoo AE, Resnik DB. Responsible Conduct of Research. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc, 2009.

Tijdink JK, Verbeke R, Smulders YM. Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists. J Empirical Res Hum Res Ethics 2014;9:64-71.

Varghese J, Jacob M. Do Medical Students Require Education on Issues Related to Plagiarism? Indian J Med Ethics 2015;12:82–87.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-30

How to Cite

DOTLIC, J. ., & JEREMIC, V. . (2015). RESEARCH MISCONDUCT IN MEDICAL SCIENCES. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Bioethica, 60(2), 95–102. Retrieved from http://193.231.18.162/index.php/subbbioethica/article/view/4514

Issue

Section

Articles