AN INSTITUTIONAL VOCABULARY FOR SUSTAINABILITY. THE COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH

Authors

  • Adela FOFIU Senior Researcher, Schloer Consulting Group, Bucharest, Romania. Email: adela.fofiu@scgee.com.
  • Raluca IGREŢ PhD candidate in Administration and Public Policies, Babeş–Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: ralucaigret@fspac.ro. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1648-9667

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeph.2018.1.03

Keywords:

sustainability lexicon, European discourses, topic modeling, discourse analysis, social moods, NLP

Abstract

Sustainability is a concept that incorporates a multitude of perceptions, attitudes and practices, from opinion leaders to decision makers, generating a lack of common framework and vision. Through our research, we question this lack at its origin: language. This paper explores institutional discourses in the European space, with the aim of collecting the vocabulary used in communicating sustainability principles. Automated tools are applied to explore raw text data of public discourses practiced in three European dimensions: European institutions (political dimension), UN consultative bodies (civil dimension) and European news outlets (media dimension). We use a mixed methods and mixed techniques research design, which combines text mining through Topic Modelling (TM) with a glossary-based approach using key words in context (KIWC) analysis. We analyze our corpus to discover keywords, topics proportion, social mood trends, for each type and source of discourse.

References

CASTI, John, (2010), Mood Matters. From Rising Skirt Lengths to the Collapse of World Powers, Copernicus Books, Springer Science+Business Media, New York.

CLARK, A. M., (2013) George Lakoff to green marketers: use the F-word, The Guardian, available online at https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/george-lakoff-green-marketing, retrieved on 27 March 2018.

DE ANGELIS, Andrea, (2015), Structural Topic Models to study political texts: an application to the Five Star Movement’s blog, available online at https://me.eui.eu/andrea-de-angelis/blog/structural-topic-models-to-study-political-text-an-application-to-the-five-star-movements-blog/, retrieved on 10 April 2018.

DUMITRU, Adina, (2016), GLAMURS overview. Framing discussion: Research, policy and practice, within the conference presentation Making time for sustainability: promising avenues for transitions to sustainable lifestyles and a green economy, 30 noiembrie-1 decembrie 2016, Bruxelles, Belgia.

FAIRCLOUGH, N. (2012), Critical Discourse Analysis, International Advances in Engineering and technology (IAET), Vol. 7 July 2012, International Scientific Researchers, accessed on March 28, 2018 http://scholarism.net/FullText/2012071.pdf

FAIRCLOUGH, Norman and Isabella FAIRCLOUGH, (2012), Political Discourse Analysis: A Methods for Advanced Students, London: Routledge.

FELDMAN, R., & SANGER, J. (2007). The text mining handbook: advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data. Cambridge University Press.

GRAHAM, Shawn, SCOTT Weingart, and Ian MILLIGAN, (2017), Getting Started with Topic Modeling and MALLET, available online at https://programminghistorian.org/lessons/topic-modeling-and-mallet, retrieved 15 December 2017.

JABER, David, (2009), The Language of Sustainability: Why Words Matter, available online at https://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2009/11/18/language-sustainability-why-words-matter, retrieved 20 April 2017.

KNOWLES, Bran; Lynne BLAIR; Stuart Walker, (2014), Toward a Sustainability Lexicon and Pattern Language?, Workshop position paper submitted to CHI’14, workshop entitled: What have we learned? A SIGCHI HCI & Sustainability community work-shop, available online at http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/69376/, retrieved 20 April 2017.

LAKOFF, George, (2008), Idea Framing, Metaphors, and Your Brain, YouTube video by For a.tv, published on July 16, 2008, accessed on March 27, 2018, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_CWBjyIERY.

LAKOFF, George, (2010), Why it Matters How We Frame the Environment, Environmental Communication, 4:1, 70-81, accessed on March 27, 2018 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17524030903529749

PRECHTER, Robert, (NA), Social Mood, available online at https://www.socionomics.net/2011/04/social-mood/ accessed on March 27, 2018.

PRECHTER, Robert, (2011), Socionomic Causality and the Standard View, lecture at the World Futurist Society in July, 2010, available online at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpZAyIiJlyE, accessed on March 27, 2018.

ROBERTS, Margaret E., Brandon M. STEWART, Dustin TINGLEY, and Edoardo M. AIROLDI, (2013), The Structural Topic Model and Applied Social Science, available online at https://scholar.princeton.edu/files/bstewart/files/stmnips2013.pdf, retrieved on 10 April 2018.

SLAPER, Timothy; Tanya HALL, (2011), The Triple Bottom Line: What Is It and How Does It Work?, Indiana Business Review, vol. 86, issue 1.

SEMINO, E., DEMJEN, Z., and DEMMEN, J., (2016), An Integrated Approach to Metaphor and Framing in Cognition, Discourse, and Practice, with an Application to Metaphors for Cancer, Applied Linguistics 2016: 1-22, Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-20

How to Cite

FOFIU, A., & IGREŢ, R. (2018). AN INSTITUTIONAL VOCABULARY FOR SUSTAINABILITY. THE COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Ephemerides, 63(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeph.2018.1.03

Issue

Section

Articles