WHAT MAKES ROMANIANS TO BANK ON THEIR SMARTPHONES? DETERMINANTS OF MOBILE BANKING ADOPTION

Authors

  • Imola-Zsuzsánna MOLDOVÁN Babeș-Bolyai University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, imola.moldovan@yahoo.com
  • Zsuzsa SĂPLĂCAN Lecturer, Dr., Babeș-Bolyai University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, zsuzsa.pal@econ.ubbcluj.ro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbnegotia.2018.1.01

Keywords:

mobile banking, Technology Acceptance Model, consumer behaviour, Romania.

Abstract

Mobile banking is becoming a priority for the banks and an increasingly popular banking channel for the consumers as well. According to the literature, despite a growing number of the mobile banking adoption studies worldwide, little attention has been paid to testing adoption models in Central and Eastern European countries. The aim of the study is to investigate the factors affecting mobile banking adoption in a country with relatively low mobile banking penetration rate. Based on an extended Technology Acceptance Model the present study aims to reveal the antecedents of the mobile banking adoption in Romania, and provide insightful conclusion for financial service institutions in mobile banking applications development. Our paper proposes and tests an extended model of the adoption intention of mobile banking applications. Besides the original perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use variables we also incorporated the social norm and some barrier factors such as perceived risk and technology anxiety. The results show, that the banks should consider seriously the consumer technology interface development challenges, including drivers and barriers of mobile banking adoption, because there are many other emerging non-bank players on financial service market fighting to fulfil the consumers’ financial needs.

JEL classification: G21, O33, M39

References

Aboelmaged, M.G. and Gebba, T.R. (2013), Mobile Banking Adoption : An Examination of Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior, International Journal of Business Research and Development, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 35–50.

Akturan, U. and Tezcan, N. (2012), Mobile banking adoption of the youth market”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 7 No.9, pp. 444–459.

Allport, G.W. (1935), Attitudes in C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology, Worcester: Clark University Press, pp. 798–844.

AlSoufi, A. and Ali, H. (2014), Customers’ perception of M-banking adoption in Kingdom of Bahrain: an empirical assessment of an extended TAM model, International Journal of Managing Information Technology, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 1–13.

Bain & Company (2015), The future of banking. Customer behaviour and loyalty in retail banking, available at: http://www.bain.com/publications/articles (accessed on March 21st, 2016).

Baptista, G. and Oliveira, T. (2015), Understanding mobile banking: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology combined with cultural moderators, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 50, pp. 418–430.

Baptista, G. and Oliveira, T. (2016), A weight and a meta-analysis on mobile banking acceptance research, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 63, pp. 480–489.

Barbeite, F.G. and Weiss, E.M. (2004), Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 20, pp. 1–15.

Chaouali, W., Souiden, N. and Ladhari, R. (2017), Explaining adoption of mobile banking with the theory of trying, general self-confidence, and cynicism, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 35, pp. 57–67.

Cohen, B.A. and Waugh, G.W. (1989), Assessing computer anxiety, Psychological Report, Vol. 65, pp. 735–738.

Davis, F.D. (1989), Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, And User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319–340.

Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1989), User Acceptance of Computer Technology: a Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 982–1003.

Deloitte (2010), Mobile banking: A catalyst for improving bank performance Contents, available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/ie/en/pages/operations/articles/mobile-banking-improving-performance.html (accessed on March 21st, 2016).

Federal Reserve Board (2015), Consumers and Mobile Financial Services 2015, available at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/consumers-and-mobile-financial-services-report-201503.pdf (accessed on March 21th, 2016).

Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981), Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 382–388.

Gefen, D. and Straub, D. (2005), A Practical Guide to Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and Annotated Example”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 16, available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol16/iss1/5/ (accessed on May 15th, 2016).

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. and Anderson, R. E. (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis (Seventh Ed), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Hanafizadeh, P., Behboudi, M., Abedini, A., Jalilvand, M. and Tabar, S. (2014), Mobile-banking adoption by Iranian bank clients, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 62–78.

Henseler, J. (2017), Bridging Design and Behavioral Research with Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 178–192.

Henseler, J., Hubona, G. and Ash Ray, P. (2016), Using PLS path modelling in new technology research: updated guidelines, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 116 No. 1, pp. 2–20.

Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. (1999), Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 1–55.

Ipsos and ING. (2015), ING International Survey - Mobile Banking, New Technologies and Financial Behaviour, available at: https://www.ezonomics.com/ing_international_surveys (accessed on March 21st 2016).

Kesharwani, A. and Bisht, S.S. (2012), The impact of trust and perceived risk on internet banking adoption in India An extension of technology acceptance model, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 303–322.

Khraim, H.S., Ellyan, Y., Shoubaki, A.L. and Khraim, A. S. (2011), Factors Affecting Jordanian Consumers’ Adoption of Mobile Banking Services, International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 2 No. 20, pp. 96–105.

KPMG. (2015), Mobile Banking, available at: https://www.kpmg.com/ (accessed on March 21st 2016).

Laukkanen, T. (2016), Consumer adoption versus rejection decisions in seemingly similar service innovations: The case of the Internet and mobile banking, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69 No. 7, pp. 2432–2439.

Laukkanen, T. and Kiviniemi, V. (2003), The role of information in mobile banking resistance, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 372–388.

Lee, K.S., Lee, H.S. and Kim, S.Y. (2007), Factors Influencing the Adoption Behavior of Mobile Banking: A South Korean perspective”, Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 2–9.

Lowry, P.B. and Gaskin, J. (2014), Partial Least Squares ( PLS ) Structural Equation Modeling ( SEM ) for Building and Testing Behavioral Causal Theory: When to Choose It and How to Use It, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 123–146.

Meuter, M.L., Ostrom, A.L., Bitner, M.J. and Roundtree, R. (2003), The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 56, pp. 899–906.

Mortimer, G., Neale, L., Hasan, S.F.E. and Dunphy, B. (2015), Investigating the factors influencing the adoption of m-banking: a cross cultural study, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 33 no. 4, pp. 545–570.

Moser, F. (2015), Mobile Banking - A fashionable concept or an institutionalized channel in future retail banking? Analyzing patterns in the practical and academic mobile banking literature, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 162–177.

Ouyang, Y. (2012), A use intention survey of mobile banking with smart phones an integrated study of security anxiety - Internet trust and TAM, Innovative Marketing, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 15–20.

Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H. and Pahnila, S. (2004), Consumer acceptance of online banking : an extension of the technology acceptance model, Internet Research, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 224–235.

Püschel, J., Mazzon, J.A. and Hernandez, J.M.C. (2010), Mobile banking: Proposition of an integrated adoption intention framework, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 389–409.

PwC. (2014), The future shape of banking, available at: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/financial-services/publications/assets/pwc-the-future-shape-of-banking.pdf (accessed on March 21st 2016).

Riquelme, H.E. and Rios, R.E. (2010), The moderating effect of gender in the adoption of mobile banking”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 328–341.

Safeena, R., Date, H., Kammani, A. and Hundewale, N. (2012), Technology Adoption and Indian Consumers: Study on Mobile Banking”, International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, Vol. 4 No. 6, pp. 1020–1024.

Shaikh, A.A., Glavee-Geo, R. and Karjaluoto, H. (2015), An Empirical Investigation of Mobile Banking Services Adoption in Pakistan, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 9 No. 11, pp. 3676–3684.

Shaikh, A.A. and Karjaluoto, H. (2015), Mobile banking adoption: A literature review, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 129–142.

Shen, Y., Huang, C., Chu, C. and Hsu, C. (2010), A benefit – cost perspective of the consumer adoption of the mobile banking system”, Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 497–511.

Statista (2016), Number of smartphone users worldwide from 2014 to 2019 (in millions), available at: http://www.statista.com/statistics/330695 (accessed on March 21st 2016).

Statista (2017a), Forecast of mobile internet user numbers in Romania from 2014 to 2021, available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/567283/predicted-number-of-mobile-internet-users-in-romania/ (accessed on June 6th 2017).

Statista (2017b), Forecast of smartphone user numbers in Romania from 2014 to 2021, available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/566182/predicted-number-of-smartphone-users-in-romania/ (accessed on June 6th 2017).

Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000), A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 186–204.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-16

How to Cite

MOLDOVÁN, I.-Z., & SĂPLĂCAN, Z. (2018). WHAT MAKES ROMANIANS TO BANK ON THEIR SMARTPHONES? DETERMINANTS OF MOBILE BANKING ADOPTION. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Negotia, 63(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbnegotia.2018.1.01

Issue

Section

Articles