STRATEGIES AND STRUCTURES OF POLISH SMES

Wioletta MIERZEJEWSKA

Authors

Wioletta MIERZEJEWSKA Institute of Management, Warsaw School of Economics, Poland, wjakub@sgh.waw.pl https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9777-4376

Keywords:

strategy, organizational structure.

Abstract

The topic of strategy-structure relation has already been widely discussed in the literature but the research so far concentrated mainly on large enterprises in developed countries while not much research has been done on a sample of small and medium-sized enterprises in the so called transition economies. This study aims to answer the question whether the strategy is a factor determining organisational structure in small and medium-sized enterprises and whether the structures of small and medium-sized enterprises applying various strategies have different characteristics. Strategies and related organisational structures of SME were analysed using a sample of 380 companies from the SME sector in Poland. The research was carried out using the CATI (computer assisted telephonic interview) method, which made it possible to analyse a large group of enterprises. Factors determining the organisational structure were chosen on the basis of a literature review. The description of organisational structures was based on the concept of Burns and Stalker, identifying mechanistic and organic structures, the different features in respect of level of formalisation, centralisation, standardisation and organisational structure configuration. Strategies were identified according to their development direction (diversification, internationalisation). Unfortunately, the findings of this study show very weak statistical relations between strategy and organisational structure dimensions. This may be associated with other factors influencing the structure of small and medium-sized enterprises, and requires further study. However, in managers’ opinion, applied strategy is one of the most important structure-creating factor.

Author Biography

Wioletta MIERZEJEWSKA, Institute of Management, Warsaw School of Economics, Poland, wjakub@sgh.waw.pl

PhD, Institute of Management, Warsaw School of Economics, Poland, wjakub@sgh.waw.pl

References

Aldrich H (1972), “Technology and Organizational Structure - A Re-examination of the Findings of the Aston Group”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.17.

Blau P., McHugh Falbe C., McKinley W., Tracy Ph. (1976), “Technology and Organization in Manufacturing”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 1

Bourgeois L. I. III, Mcallister D. W., Mitchell T. R. (1978), “The Effects of Different Organizational Environments upon Decisions about Organizational Structure”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 21, No. 3.

Brzozowski M. (2010), Organizacja wirtualna [Virtual Organization], PWE, Warsaw.

Burns T., Stalker G.M. (1961), The Management of Innovation, Tavistock, London.

Ciborra C. (1996), “The Platform Organization: Recombining Strategies, Structure, and Surprises”, Organization Science, March-April.

Chandler A. D. (1962), Strategy and structure. Chapters in the History of American Industrial Enterprises, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

Crozier M. (1964), The Bureaucratic Phenomenon, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Dalton D., Todor W., Spendolini M., Fielding G., Porter L. (1980), “Organization Structure and Performance: A Critical Review”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 5.

Donaldson L. (1982), “Divisionalization and Diversification: a Longitudinal Study”, Academy of Management Journal.

Galetić L., Klindžić M., Načinović I. (2010), “Organizational Change as an Instrument of Overcoming Economic Crisis”, 5th International Conference An Enterprise Odyssey: From Crisis to Prosperity - Challenges for Government and Business, Zagreb.

Greiner L.E. (1998), “Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow”, Harvard Business Review, May–June.

Hensel P., Glinka B. (2006), Projektowanie organizacji [Design Organization], Warsaw University, Warsaw.

Hoskinsson R.E. (1987), “Multidivisional Structure and Performance. The Contingency of Diversification Strategy”, Academy of Management Journal.

Kimberly J. (1976), “Organizational Size and the Structuralist Perspective: A Review, Critique, and Proposal”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21, no. 4.

Koberg Ch. S., Ungson G.R. (1987), “The Effects on Environmental Uncertainty and Dependence of Organizational Structure and Performance. A Comparative Study”, Journal of Management, vol. 13, no. 4.

Kraśniak J. (2012), Zmiany struktur organizacyjnych przedsiębiorstw w procesie internacjonalizacji [Changes in the Organizational Structures of Enterprises in the Process of Internationalization], Wyd. Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, Poznań.

Lawrence P.R., Dyer D. (1983), Renewing American industry, Free Press, New York.

Lichtarski J. M. (2011), Struktury zadaniowe. Składniki, własności i uwarunkowania [Task Structures. Components, Properties and Conditions], Wyd. UE we Wrocławiu, Wrocław.

Lincoln J. R., Hanada M., McBride K. (1986), “Organizational Structures in Japanese and U.S. Manufacturing”, Administrative Science Quarterly no. 31.

McDonald, J. and Wiesner, R. (1997). “Organisational Change and Enterprise Bargaining in Regional SMEs”, in: Bramble, T., Harley, B., Hall, R. and Whitehouse, G. (Ed.), Current Research in Industrial Relations, Proceedings of the 11th AIRAANZ Conference, 30 January - 1 February, Brisbane.

Meier K.M., Bohte J. (2003), “Span of Control and Public Organizations: Implementing Luther Gulick's Research Design”, Public Administration Review, vol. 63, no. 1.

Perrow Ch, (1970), “Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View”, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

Pleschko L. (2006), “Strategic Orientation, Organisational Structure, and the Associated Effects on Performance”, Journal of Financial Services Marketing , vol. 12.

Pugh D. S., Hickson D. J, Hinings C. R., Turner C. (1968), “Dimensions of Organization Structure”, Administrative Science Quarterly.

Rumelt R. (1972), “Strategy , Structure and Financial Performance of the Fortune “500” 1950–1970”, unpublished DBA dissertation, Harvard Business School, presented by: Scott B.R., “The Industrial State. Old Myths and New Realities”, Harvard Business Review 1973, vol. 51, Iss. 2.

Scott B.R. (1973), “The Industrial State. Old Myths and New Realities”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 51, Iss. 2.

Spanos Y., Prastacos G., Papadakis V. (2001), “Greek Firms and EMU: Contrasting SMEs and Large-Sized Enterprises”, European Management Journal vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 638–648.

Tata J., Prasad S., Thorn R. (1999), “The Influence of Organizational Structure on the Effectiveness of TQM Programs”, Journal of Managerial Issues, vol. 11, Iss. 4.

Williamson O. W. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implication, New York Free Press 1975, presented by: Hoskinsson R. E., “Multidivisional Structure and Performance. The Contingency of Diversification Strategy”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 30, Iss. 4, pp. 625-627.

Woodward J. (1965), Industrial Organizations; Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, London.

Wrigley (1970), “Divisional Autonomy and Diversification”, unpublished DBA dissertation, Harvard Business School, presented by: Scott B.R., “The Industrial State. Old Myths and New Realities”, Harvard Business Review 1973, vol. 51, Iss. 2.

Zakrzewska-Bielawska A. (2008), Organizational Design in the Enterprise Development Process. A series of Monographs, Łodź.

Zammuto R., Griffith T., Majchrzak A., Dougherty D., Faraj S., 2007, “Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization”, Organization Science, vol. 18, 5.