SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING PRACTICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SOUTH AFRICAN AND BOTSWANA LISTED COMPANIES
Keywords:
Comparative analysis, Cross-country studies, Sustainability reporting, Environmental Disclosure, Corporate governance reporting, Contextual Disclosure, Voluntary Corporate Disclosure, Content analysis, CSR Reporting.Abstract
Sustainability reporting is a type of reporting concerning how entities deal with environmental, social, economic and corporate governance issues. This form of corporate reporting has become a primary form of corporate reporting – just like financial reporting. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the sustainability reporting practices of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) companies are comparable to those of the Botswana Stock Exchange (BSE) companies. The findings suggest that differences in the level of sustainability reporting could be due to fewer sustainable activities in the BSE sample or to inadequate reporting of sustainable activities in in the BSE sample. These results support the Institutional theory but seem to disagree with other theories that explain sustainability reporting. A study of Institutional differences between Botswana and South Africa is recommended.
References
Adams, C.A. & Larringa-Gonzalez, C. 2007. ‘Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance’. Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(3):333.
Aerts, W., Cormier, D. & Magnan, M. 2006, May-June). ‘Intra-industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: An international perspective’. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(3), 299–331.
Aguilera, R.V., Williams, C.A., Conley, J.M. & Rupp, D.E. 2006. Corporate and Social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the U.K. and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3): 147–157.
Ali, W. & Rizwan, M. 2013. Factors Influencing Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure (CSED) Practices in The Developing Countries – An Institutional Theoretical Perspective. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(3): 590–609.
Amran, A. & Haniffa, R. (2010). ‘Evidence in Development of Sustainability Reporting: A Case of a Developing Country’. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(3):141–156
Azarian, R. 2011.’Potentials and limitations of Comparative Method in Social Science’. International Journal of Humanities and Social science, 1(1): 113–125.
Berthelot, S., Cormier, D. & Magnan, M. 2003. ‘Environmental disclosure research: review and synthesis’. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22:1–44.
Brookhart, J.M., Beeler, J.D. & Culpepper, D. 2005. ‘Regulatory guidance, legitimacy theory and environmental disclosure’, Journal of Accounting & Finance Research, 13(2):1
Campbell, D. 2003. ‘Intra- and intersectional effects in environmental disclosures: evidence for legitimacy theory’. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22, 357–371
Clarke, T. (ed). 2004. Theories of Corporate Governance: The philosophical foundations of corporate governance. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
Comier, D., Magnan, M., & Velthoven,B.V.,2005. Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies.economic incentives, public pressure or institutional conditions?.European Accounting Review,14(1) 3-39.
Cronjé, C.J. 2008. Corporate Annual Reports (CARS): Accounting Practices in Transition. V.D.M. Verlag Dr. Müller, Saarbrücken. Germany.
Deegan, G. & Gordon, B.1996. ‘A Study of Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian Corporations’. Accounting and Business Research, (26):187–199.
De Villiers, C.J. 2003. ‘Why do South African Companies not report more environmental information when managers are so positive about this kind of reporting?’ Meditari Accountancy Research, 11(1):11–23.
De Villiers, C.J. & Barnard, P. 2000. ‘Environmental reporting in South Africa from 1994 to 1999: A research note’. Meditari Accountancy Research, 8(1):15–23.
De Villiers, C.J. & Lubbe, D.S. 2001. ‘Industry differences in respect of corporate environmental reporting in South Africa: A research note’. Meditari Accountancy Research, 9: 81–91.
De Villiers, C. & Van Staden, C. 2004. Trends in Environmental Reporting: Evidence from Africa. The Fourth Asian Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference Singapore, July 4–6.
De Villiers, C. & Van Staden, C.J. 2006. ‘Can less environmental disclosure have a legitimising effect? Evidence from Africa’. Accounting Organisations and Society, 31(8):763–781.
DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell, W.W. (1990). Introduction to the new institutionalism. In
W.W. Powell, & P.J. DiMaggio, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL.: University of Chicago Press.
Doppegieter, J.J. & De Villiers, C.J. 1996. ‘Environmental reporting practices in the South African energy sector’. Management Dynamics, 5(1):15–42.
Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. ‘Agency and institutional theory explanations: the case of retail sales compensation’. Academy of Management Journal, 31:488–511.
Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). 2006. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Global Reporting Initiative: Boston.
Gouws, D.G. & Cronjé, C.J. 2008. ‘Corporate annual reports: accounting practices in transition’. South African Business Review, 12(2):108–133.
Gray, R., Owen, D. & Adams, C. 1996. Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate, Social and Environmental Reporting. Prentice Hall Europe. Hemel Hempstead: Hertfordshire.
Idowu, S.O. & Towler, B.A.2004. ‘A comparative study of the contents of corporate Social responsibility reports of U.K. companies’. Management of Environmental Quality an International journal, 15(4): 420–437.
Institute of Directors in Southern Africa (IoDSA). 2009. King III Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa. Johannesburg: IOD.
Islam, M.A., & Deegan, C. (2008). ‘Motivations for an organisation within a developing country to report social responsibility information’. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(6), 850–874.
Kiyanga, B.P.L. 2014. Corporate disclosure quality – A comparative study of Botswana and South Africa. Masters dissertation. Pretoria. University of South Africa.
Kolk, A., 2003. Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12: 279-291.
Kolk, A. 2005. ‘Environmental reporting by multinationals for the triad: Convergence or divergence?’ Management International Review, 45(1) special issue/1:145–166.
Kolk, A. 2008. ‘Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals’ reporting practices’. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17:1–15.
KPMG, 2005. KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2005. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: KPMG Global Sustainability Services.
Maignan, I. & Ralston, D.A. 2002. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from Businesses’ Self-representation’. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3):497-514.
Matten, D. & Moon. 2008.’Implicit and Explicit CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of corporate Social Responsibility’. Academy of Management Review, 33:404-424.
Mbekomize, C.J. & Wally-Dima, L. 2013. ‘Social and Environmental Disclosure by Parastatals and Companies Listed on the BSE’. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 3(3):66-75.
Moloi, S.T.M. 2008. Assessment of Corporate Governance reporting in the annual reports of South African listed companies. Unpublished M. Com (Accounting) dissertation. University of South Africa.
Mouton, J. 2001. How to succeed in your masters &doctoral studies. A South African guide and resource book. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
Myburg, J.E. 2001.‘The informativeness of voluntary disclosure in annual reports of listed industrial companies in South Africa’. Meditari Accounting Research, 9:199–216.
Power, M. 1991. ‘Auditing and environmental expertise: Between protest and professionalization’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 4(3):30–42.
Rankokwane, B. 2008. An Evaluation of the Role of Supreme Audit Institutions in Promoting Environmental Accountability – the case of the Office of the Auditor General, Gaborone – Botswana. Unpublished Master of Science thesis. East Anglia: University of East Anglia.
Said, R., Zainuddin, Y. H. & Haron, H. 2009. ‘The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Corporate Governance Characteristics in Malaysian Public Listed Companies’. Social Responsibility Journal,5(3): 212–226.
Scot, R.W. 2004. Reflections on Half a Century of Organisational Psychology, Annual Review of Sociology, 30:1–21.
Shocker, A. & Sethi, S. (1974). An approach to incorporating social preferences in developing corporate action strategies. California: Melville.
Suchman, C.M. 1995. ‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional approaches’. Academy Management reviews, 20(3): 571–61.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Negotia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
