SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF VOLUNTARY CARBON INFORMATION DISCLOSURE IN THE REAL ESTATE SECTOR OF MALAYSIA
Keywords:
social factor, legitimacy, carbon disclosure, real estate, Malaysia.Abstract
The knowledge is power is a quote effective in the public space, where the level of information and awareness people have determines the level of power they exercise. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence social factors has on corporate voluntary carbon disclosure in the property sector of a developing country. The data was collected from 2013 annual reports of 126 listed companies, comprising sixteen (16) property investment companies, seventy six (76) property companies and thirty four (34) construction companies in Malaysia. The analysis was conducted with Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling, with the bootstrap used for significance testing. The result shows that social factor has a significant influence in determining voluntary carbon disclosure. It was observed in the result that company visibility has a greater influence in motiving disclosure. The implication of the outcome is that, improvement in the level of knowledge and awareness of the public, on the need for corporate participation in climate change mitigation and carbon reduction. The more awareness, the more demand by stakeholders on companies; the more companies will be motivated to disclose carbon information in their annual report.
References
Alsaeed, K. (2006). The association between firm-specific characteristics and disclosure: The case of Saudi Arabia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(5), 476-496.
Archel, P. (2003). Social and environmental information reporting of big size Spanish firms in the period 1994-1998. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 32(117), 571-601.
Bebbington, J., Larrinaga-González, C., & Moneva-Abadía, J.M. (2008). Legitimating reputation/the reputation of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 371-374.
Belkaoui, A., & Karpik, P.G. (1989). Determinants of the corporate decision to disclose social information. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2(1).
Berthelot, S., & Robert, A.M. (2011). Climate change disclosures: An examination of Canadian oil and gas firms. Issues in Social & Environmental Accounting, 5.
Borghei-Ghomi, Z., & Leung, P. (2013). An empirical analysis of the determinants of greenhouse gas voluntary disclosure in Australia. Accounting and Finance Research, 2(1), p110.
Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2006). Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(1), 6-18.
Breton, G., & Côté, L. (2006). Profit and the legitimacy of the Canadian banking industry. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(4), 512-539.
Busch, T., & Hoffmann, V. (2007). Emerging carbon constraints for corporate risk management”,. Ecological Economics, 62 (3/4, ), 518-528.
Cho, C.H., Freedman, M., & Patten, D.M. (2012). Corporate disclosure of environmental capital expenditures: A test of alternative theories. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(3), 486-507.
Cho, C.H., & Patten, D.M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, organizations and society, 32(7), 639-647.
Clarkson, P.M., Li, Y., Richardson, G.D., & Vasvari, F.P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, organizations and society, 33(4), 303-327.
Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European accounting review, 14(1), 3-39.
De Villiers, C., & Van Staden, C.J. (2006). Can less environmental disclosure have a legitimising effect? Evidence from Africa. Accounting, organizations and society, 31(8), 763-781.
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: the legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures-a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311.
Deegan, C. (2007). Organisational legitimacy as a motive for sustainability reporting.
Deegan, C., & Carroll, G. (1993). An analysis of incentives for Australian firms to apply for reporting excellence awards. Accounting and business research, 23(91), 219-227.
Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1996). Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(2), 50-67.
Dwyer, R., Lamond, D., Prado-Lorenzo, J.-M., Rodríguez-Domínguez, L., Gallego-Álvarez, I., & García-Sánchez, I.-M. (2009). Factors influencing the disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions in companies world-wide. Management Decision, 47(7), 1133-1157.
Freedman, M., & Jaggi, B. (2005). Global warming, commitment to the Kyoto protocol, and accounting disclosures by the largest global public firms from polluting industries. The International Journal of Accounting, 40(3), 215-232.
Freedman, M., & Jaggi, B. (2011). Global warming disclosures: impact of Kyoto protocol across countries. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 22(1), 46-90.
Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D.M., & Sinclair, C.D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of business finance & accounting, 28(3‐4), 327-356.
Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47-77.
Hair. (2010). Multivariate data analysis.
Hair, Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Hair, Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
Henseler, J., & Fassott, G. (2010). Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: An illustration of available procedures Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 713-735): Springer.
Holthausen, R.W., & Leftwich, R.W. (1983). The economic consequences of accounting choice implications of costly contracting and monitoring. Journal of accounting and economics, 5, 77-117.
Jin, X.H., Doloi, H., & Gao, S.Y. (2007). Relationship‐based determinants of building project performance in China. Construction Management and Economics, 25(3), 297-304.
Kang, H.H., & Gray, S.J. (2011). Reporting intangible assets: Voluntary disclosure practices of top emerging market companies. The International Journal of Accounting, 46(4), 402-423.
King, R. (2009). Investors Demand Carbon-Risk Disclosure. Bloomberg Business Week. Technology.
Larrán Jorge, M., & Giner, B. (2002). The use of the Internet for corporate reporting by Spanish companies.
Liu, X., & Anbumozhi, V. (2009). Determinant factors of corporate environmental information disclosure: an empirical study of Chinese listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(6), 593-600.
Luo, L., Lan, Y.C., & Tang, Q. (2012). Corporate incentives to disclose carbon information: Evidence from the CDP Global 500 report. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 23(2), 93-120.
Luo, L., Tang, Q., & Lan, Y.-C. (2013). Comparison of propensity for carbon disclosure between developing and developed countries: A resource constraint perspective. Accounting Research Journal, 26(1), 6-34.
Magness, V. (2006). Strategic posture, financial performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(4), 540-563.
Meyer, J.W., & Scott, W.R. (1983). Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality, 199, 215.
Milne, M.J., & Patten, D.M. (2002). Securing organizational legitimacy: An experimental decision case examining the impact of environmental disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 372-405.
Mobus. (2005). Mandatory environmental disclosures in a legitimacy theory context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(4), 492-517.
Musa Mangena, P., Jia Liu, D., Chithambo, L., & Tauringana, V. (2014). Company specific determinants of greenhouse gases disclosures. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 15(3), 323-338.
Newson, M., & Deegan, C. (2002). Global expectations and their association with corporate social disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore, and South Korea. The International Journal of Accounting, 37(2), 183-213.
Patten, D.M. (1992). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and public policy, 10(4), 297-308.
Rankin, M., Windsor, C., & Wahyuni, D. (2011). An investigation of voluntary corporate greenhouse gas emissions reporting in a market governance system: Australian evidence. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(8), 1037-1070.
Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351-366.
Roberts, R.W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, organizations and society, 17(6), 595-612.
Solomon, A., & Lewis, L. (2002). Incentives and disincentives for corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(3), 154-169.
Stanny, E. (2013). Voluntary disclosures of emissions by US firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(3), 145-158.
Suchman, M.C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review, 20(3), 571-610.
Wittneben, B.B., Okereke, C., Banerjee, S.B., & Levy, D.L. (2012). Climate change and the emergence of new organizational landscapes. Organization Studies, 33(11), 1431-1450.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Negotia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
