THEORIES OF DEVELOPMENT POLES APPLICABILITY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION NEIGHBOURHOOD CROSS-BORDER FRAME

Authors

Keywords:

development poles, economic growth, cross-border.

Abstract

Nowadays the cross-border cooperation is promoted through policies and with financial help involved in order to increase the territorial cohesion along the national borders of EU and to increase the relationships with the neighbour countries. At a certain degree the areas along the borders can be considered regions that, being peripheric, need development despite the specificity brought by the different statuses. The paper has as central the concept that was first put forth systematically by Francois Perroux, being now into use in many countries, both in theoretical discussions and public policy programs. The promotion of regional development centres will serve as focal point and incentive for further development. Such a regional concentration helps through the benefits of technological external economies and makes the growth centre attractive to entrepreneurs, thus initiating further development. We examine the actual approaches in the literature on the economic growth, development poles and their main characteristics based on which we are able to identify the applicability of these theories in a cross-border frame in our future researches.

Author Biography

Marcela SLUSARCIUC, Romanian Academy Bucharest, Romania, slusarciuc.marcela@usv.ro

Post-doctoral researcher, Institute of National Economy – Romanian Academy Bucharest*, Romania, slusarciuc.marcela@usv.ro

References

Altăr, M. & Armeanu, D., 2014. Creşterea economică este necesară dar nu şi suficientă pentru a asigura dezvoltare economică. [Online] Available at: http://www.zf.ro/zf-24/cresterea-economica-este-necesara-dar-nu-si-suficienta-pentru-a-asigura-dezvoltare-economica-11895580 [Accessed 26 06 2014].

Amos, O., 1996. Growth Pole Cycles. s.l.:Oklahoma State University.

Angelescu, C., Socol, C. & Socol, A. G., 2009. Politici economice. București: Ed. Economică.

Armstrong, H. & Taylor, J., 1993. Regional Economics and Policy. 2nd ed. s.l.:Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Armstrong, H. & Taylor, J., 2000. Regional Economics and Policy. s.l.:Blackwell.

Asheim, B., 2000. Industrial districts: the contributions of Marshall and beyond. In: G. Clark, M. Feldman & M. Gertler, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. s.l.:Oxford University Press.

Bari, I. T., 2010. Tratat de economie politica globala. Bucuresti: Ed. Economica.

Barro, R. & Sala-i-Martin, X., 1995. Economic Growth. New York: McGraw Hill Inc.

Benini, R. & Czyzewski, A., 2007. Regional disparities and economic growth in Russia: new growth patterns and catching up. Econ Change, Issue 40, p. 91–135.

Borbély, L., 2011. Growth Poles as Sustainable Development Systems. Review of Economic Studies and Research Virgil Madgearu, Issue 1, pp. 49-66.

Dobrescu, E. M. & Dobre, E. M., 2014. Theories Regarding the Role of the Growth Poles in the Economic Integration. Procedia Economics and Finance, Volume 8, p. 262–267.

Fujita, M. & Krugman, P. R., 1995. When is the Economy Monocentric? von Thünen and Chamberlain Unified. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Volume 25, p. 505–528.

Fujita, M. & Krugman, P. R., 2004. The New Economic Geography: Past, Present and the Future. Papers in Regional Science, Volume 83, pp. 139-164.

European Commission, 2004. European Neighbourhood Policy - Strategy paper. Brussels: s.n.

Fujita, Μ. & Mori, T., 2005. Frontiers of the New Economic Geography. Papers in Regional Science, 84(3), pp. 377-405.

Hansen, N. M., 1967. Development Pole Theory in a Regional Context. Kyklos, 20(4), p. 709–727.

Heimpold, G., 2008. Growth versus equalisation? An examination of strategies for regional policy in the Czech Republic,Hungary and Poland after EU accession. Jahrbuch fur Regionalwissenschaft, Issue 28, pp. 1-29.

Iancu, A., 2003 . Dezvoltarea intensiva si specializarea natiunilor. Bucuresti: Ed. Economica.

Kaldor, N., 1970. The Case for Regional Policies. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Volume 17, pp. 337-348.

Krugman, P. R., 1991. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy, Volume 99, p. 183–199.

Lipott, S., 2013. Cross-border cooperation and city twinning along the Italo-Slovene border. Saarbrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing.

Lipsey, R. & Chrystal, K., 2003. Principiile economiei. București: Ed. Economică.

Lucas, R., 1988. On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, Volume 22, pp. 3-42.

McCann, P., 2001. Urban and Regional Economics. s.l.: Oxford University Press.

McKee, D. L., 2008. Services, growth poles and advanced economies. Service Business, Issue 2, p. 99–107.

Myrdal, G., 1957. Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: Hutchinson.

Neubauer, H., 1976. Controversial Strategies for the Regional Advancement of Developing Countries. Intereconomics, 11(10), pp. 283-286.

Pencea, S., 2011. Reconsiderarea „modelului chinez” de dezvoltare. In: P. Prisecaru, ed. Reconsiderari ale modelului capitalist de dezvoltare si guvernanta. Bucuresti: Ed. Economica, pp. 179-206.

Perroux, F., 1955. Note sur la notion de pole de croissance. Économie appliquée, Issue 8, pp. 307-320.

Petrakos, G., Kallioras, D. & Anagnostou, A., 2007. A Generalized Model of Regional Economic Growth in the European Union,,, s.l.: s.n.

Rebelo, S., 1991. Long Run Policy Analysis and Long Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, Volume 99, pp. 500-521.

Richardson, H., 1973. Regional Growth Theory. London: MacMillan.

Rodrik, D. & Subramanian, A., 2003. The Primacy of Institutions (and what this does and does not mean). Finance & Development, June, p. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2003/06/.

Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A. & Trebi, F., 2004. Institutions rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geogrphy and Integration in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth, Issue 9, pp. 131-165.

Romer, P. M., 1986. Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(2), pp. 1002-1037.

Solow, R., 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 70.

Swan, T., 1956. Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation. Economic Record, Volume 32.

Stefan, M. C., 2008. Dezvoltare regionala si locala. Bucuresti: Ed. Economica.

Terlouw, K., 2012. Border Surfers and Euroregions: Unplanned Cross-Border Behaviour and Planned Territorial Structures of Cross-Border Governance. Planning Practice&Reasearch, 27(3), pp. 351-366.

The European Parliament, European Union Council, European Economic and Social Committee, Committee of the Regions, 2013. Joint Communication „European Neighbourhood Policy: Working towards a Stronger Partnership”. Bussels: s.n.

The European Parliament, the European Union Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 2014. Neighbourhood at the Crossroads: Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2013. Brussels: s.n.

Veblen, T., 1915. Imperial Germany and the Industrial Revolution. London: Macmillan.

Weith, T. & Gustedt, E., 2012. Introduction to Theme Issue Cross-Border Governance. Planning Practice&Research, 27(3), pp. 293-295.

Downloads

Published

2015-03-30

How to Cite

SLUSARCIUC, M. (2015). THEORIES OF DEVELOPMENT POLES APPLICABILITY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION NEIGHBOURHOOD CROSS-BORDER FRAME. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Negotia, 60(1), 41–57. Retrieved from http://193.231.18.162/index.php/subbnegotia/article/view/5210

Issue

Section

Articles