Ultrastructural aspects of „Eriogaster catax” and „Eriogaster lanestris” (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbbiol.2019.2.06

Keywords:

Eriogaster catax, E. lanestris, oviposition strategy, ecological niche.

Abstract

Eriogaster catax (Linnaeus, 1758) and E. lanestris (Linnaeus, 1758) are two related species in the family Lasiocampidae with decreasing distribution areas and extremely isolated populations, thus being vulnerable to numerous threats, particularly human impact. Until presently, the biological and ecological studies regarding the species in question are scarce, particularly for E. catax, a species protected through Annexes II and IV of the Council Directive 92/43/EEC, Annex II of the Bern Convention and Law no. 49/2011 in Romania. Taking into account the importance of the E. catax species and the insufficient information reported on the ecological need of the species, a highly detailed analysis at an ultrastructural level could provide valuable information. The primitive aspect of the wings explained the weak distribution of adults. The different flight period of adults and egg laying season were reflected on the structure, adherence and size of eggs. Also, the structure of the fibers was correlated with the different ways in which E. catax and E. lanestris use the nest.

Author Biographies

Cristian SITAR, Babeș-Bolyai University, Faculty of Biology and Geology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. E-mail: cristiansitar@yahoo.com

Babeș-Bolyai University, Faculty of Biology and Geology, 5-7 Clinicilor, 400006, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. E-mail: cristiansitar@yahoo.com

Alexandra CIORÎȚĂ, Babeș-Bolyai University, Faculty of Biology and Geology, E-mail: cristiansitar@yahoo.com

Babeș-Bolyai University, Faculty of Biology and Geology, 5-7 Clinicilor, 400006, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; National Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies, 67-103 Donat, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; E-mail: cristiansitar@yahoo.com

References

Baillet, Y. (2011). Inventaire de Eriogaster catax (Laineuse du Prunellier) sur l'ENS des communaux de Trept. Rapport d’étude rendu au format Excel de Flavia, Trept.

Baillet, Y. (2013). Inventaire de Eriogaster catax (Laineuse du Prunellier) sur l'ENS des communaux de Trept. Rapport d’étude rendu au format Excel de Flavia, Trept.

Borges, A. (2012). La Laineuse du prunellier – 2.localisation des chenilles (dans les nids communautaires) : c’est maintenant ! I NSECTES n°164 - 2012 (1)

Bury J. (2015). Nowe dane o występowaniu Eriogaster catax (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) w południowo-wschodniej Polsce. Acta Ent. Siles. 23 (online 012)1–10.

Caron, G. (2009). La laineuse du prunellier Eriogaster catax (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera, Lasiocampidae) victime des changements climatiques ? Ecologie de l’espèce et hypothèses sur son déclin dans la région genevoise. Entomo Helvetica, 2: 49-60.

Chrzanowski, A., Kuźmiński, R., Łabędzki, A., Mazur, A., & Rutkowski, P. (2013). Occurrence of Eriogaster catax (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lasiocampidae, Lepidoptera) and the proposed protective actions on the Polish territory. Nauka Przyroda ̒̒ Technologia 7, 2, (24): 1–7.

Costa, J.T. (1997). Caterpillars as social insects. American Scientist: 85, 150–159.

Drews, M., & Wachlin, V. (2003). Eriogaster catax (Linnaeus, 1758). W: Petersen B., Ellwanger G., Biewald G., Hauke U., Ludwig G., Pretscher P., Schröder E., Ssymank A. (red.). Das europäische Schutzgebietssystem Natura 2000. Ökologie und Verbreitung von Arten der FFH-Richtlinie in Deutschland. Band 1: Pflanzen und Wirbellose. Schr.R. Landschaftspflege Naturschutz 69/1: 459.464.

Dubatolov, V.V., & Zolotuhin, V.V. (1992). A list of the Lasiocampidae from the territory of the former USSR. Atalanta 23 (3/4): 531-548.

Ebert, G. (1994). Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Württembergs. Band 4, Nachtfalter II. Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart.

Farkač, J., Král D., & Škorpík, J. (2005). Červený seznam ohrožených druhů České republiky Bezobratlí. Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR. 760pp

Fernandes, F.F., & Pimenta, P.F.P. (2018). Typology and distribution of antennal sensory organs of adults Haematobia irritans of the Midwest Region of Brazil. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, 38(1), 183-188. doi:10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5499

Fitzgerald, T.D. (1995). The tent caterpillars. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-2456-9

Fitzgerald, T.D., & Costa J.T. (1999). Collective behavior in social caterpillars. pp. 379–400 in Detrain C, Deneubourg JL and Pasteels JM (eds.) Information processing in social insects. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.

Freina, J.J. de, (1996). Eriogaster catax (Linnaeus, 1758). W: Helsdingen P.J., van Willemse L., Speight M.C.D. (red.): Background information on invertebrates of the Habitat Directive and the Bern Convention. Part I: Crustaceae, Coleoptera and Lepidoptera. Nature and Environment No. 79: 117.120.

Freina, J.J. de, & Witt, T.J. (1987). Die Bombyces und Sphinges der Westpaläarktis (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Edition Forschung und Wissenschaft, München.

Galant, R., Skeath, J.B., Paddock, S., Lewis, D.L., & Carroll, S.B. (1998). Expression pattern of a butterfly achaete-scute homolog reveals the homology of butterfly wing scales and insect sensory bristles. Current Biology 1998, 8:807–813.

Höttinger, H. (2005). Der Hecken-Wollafter (Eriogaster catax L.) in Wien (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Endbericht einer Studie im Auftrag der Wiener Magistratsabteilung MA 22 (Umweltschutz).

Kadej, M., Zając, K., & Tarnawski, D. (2018). Oviposition site selection of a threatened moth Eriogaster catax (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) in agricultural landscape - implicationsfor its conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation, 22, 29–39.

Karsholt, O. & Razowski J. (eds.). (1996) The Lepidoptera of Europe. A distributional checklist. Apollo Books, Stenstrup.

Konvička, M., Beneš, J., & Čížek, L. (2005). Ohrožený hmyz nelesních stanovišť: ochrana a management. Sagittaria 2005. 127 pp.

Konvička, M., Hula, V., & Beneš, J. (2006). Metodika monitoringu evropsky významného druhu bourovec trnkový (Eriogaster catax). Nepublikovaný rukopis, deponován na UP AOPK ČR Praha. 7pp.

Leraut, P. (2006). Moths of Europe. Volume 1: Saturnids, Lasiocampids, Hawkmoths, Tiger Moths. N.A.P. Editions, Verrières le Buisson. 395 pp.

Li, Y., Liu, F., Du, X., Li, Z., & Wu, J. (2018). Ultrastructure of antennal sensilla of three fruit borers (Lepidoptera: Crambidae or Tortricidae). PLoS ONE 13(10): e0205604. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205604

Ma, M., Chang, M., Lu, Y., Ley, C., & Yang, F. (2017). Ultrastructure of sensilla of antennae and ovipositor of Sitotroga cerealella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), and location of female sex pheromone gland. Scientific Reports 7, 40637. doi:10.1038/srep40637

Malkiewicz, A. (2015). Barczatka kataks w Krainie Łęgów Odrzańskich – występowanie, zagrożenia, zalecenia ochronne. In: Pietkiewicz M. and Sztwiertnia H. 2015 Kronika Łęgów Odrzańskich nr 1. Rzadkie i chronione zwierzęta krainy Łęgów Odrzańskich - zagrożenia i perspektywy rozwoju: Zimowanie ptaków w Krainie Łęgów Odrzańskich.Prochowice 2015. ISBN: 978-83-942200-0-6

Mark, C., Parsons, S., & Holwell, G. (2017). Antennal morphology and micro-sensory architecture of the New Zealand magpie moth, Nyctemera annulata (Lepidoptera: Erebidae): diversity, distribution and dimorphism. Austral Entomology. doi: 10.1111/aen.12279

Oleksa, A. (2010). 1075 Barczatka kataks Eriogaster catax (Linnaeus, 1758) [Eastern eggar Eriogaster catax (Linnaeus, 1758)]. In: Monitoring gatunków i siedlisk przyrodniczych ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem specjalnych obszarów ochrony siedlisk Natura 2000. Wyniki monitoringu. GIOŚ Warszawa [in Polish].

Pro Natura (2005). Lepidopterologen-Arbeitsgruppe (2000): Schmetterlinge und ihre Lebensräume, Band 3. Pro Natura - Schweizerischer Bund für Naturschutz, ISBN 3855870322, 928 Seiten.

Ruf, C., & Fiedler, K. (2002). Plasticity in foraging patterns of colonies of the small eggar moth, Eriogaster lanestris (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Oecologia 131: 626–634.

Ruf, C., Freese, A., & Fiedler, K. (2003). Larval sociality in three species of central-place foraging lappet moths (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae): a comparative survey. Zoologischer Anzeiger - A Journal of Comparative Zoology 242 (3): 209.222.

Sáfián, S. (2006). The occurrences of Eriogaster catax (Linnaeus, 1758) and Eriogaster lanestris (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) in the Körös Valley (South-Eastern Hungary) Folia Entomologica Hungarica, 67, 137-143.

Yuvaraj, J.K., Andersson, M.., Anderbrant, O., & Löfstedt, C. (2018). Diversity of olfactory structures: A comparative study of antennal sensilla in Trichoptera and Lepidoptera. Micron, vol. 111, pp. 9-18. doi:10.1016/j.micron.2018.05.006

Zhou, Q., Yu, L., Shen, X., Li, Y., Xu, W., Yi, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2009). Homology of Dipteran Bristles and Lepidopteran Scales: Requirement for the Bombyx mori achaete-scute Homologue ASH2. Genetics 183: 619–627. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.102848

Downloads

Published

2019-12-10

How to Cite

SITAR, C., & CIORÎȚĂ, A. (2019). Ultrastructural aspects of „Eriogaster catax” and „Eriogaster lanestris” (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Biologia, 64(2), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbbiol.2019.2.06

Issue

Section

Articles