Comparative analysis of the digestive system’s anatomical parts in two zoophagous bird species: White Stork (Ciconia ciconia) and Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo)

Authors

  • Alexandra-Iulia PREJA University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Călin Csaba POP University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Irina MOLDOVAN University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Alexandru N. STERMIN Babeș-Bolyai University, Department of Taxonomy and Ecology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. *Corresponding author: sandu.stermin@yahoo.com https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-6498
  • Aurel DAMIAN University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbbiol.2021.2.02

Keywords:

functional anatomy, esophagus, crop, intestine, feeding behavior.

Abstract

Aristotle in his anatomical observations is marking the beginning of functional anatomy followed by Georges Cuvier that formulate the low of the correlation of parts. According with this we can expect that the digestive system structures tend to be similar between species that consume approximately the same type of food. In this study we chose to evaluate macroscopic the digestive system of two different zoophytophagous species, with similar body size but different life behavior and feeding strategies: White Stork (Ciconia ciconia) and Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo). Data were collected after the dissection of 10 carcass (5 White Stork and 5 Common Buzzard). The digestive tract and its structures were measured and weighed. In common buzzard the beak is strong and short adapted for the laceration of the prey. In white stork the beak is long, strong, straight adapted to capture prey like a harpoon. In both species, the esophagus is located on the right side of the neck, the length is different, proportional to the neck. In common buzzard the crop is present and absent in white storks. The cuticle or koilin layer is highlighted in white stork compared to common buzzard. In common buzzard, the small intestine is reduced in size, without marked transition between the duodenum and the ileum. The white storks have a long small intestine with many loops, with no transition between the segments. In both species, the cecum is reduced in size and has a vestigial appearance; the colon is reduced in size, and extends from the level of the ileo-colic junction to the cloaca. The digestive system is adapted to a strictly carnivorous diet and the differences identified between the anatomical structures of the digestive tract of the two species are correlated with the differences of their feeding behavior.

Article history: Received 20 September 2021; Revised 23 October 2021; Accepted 6 November 2021; Available online 30 December 2021.

References

Fidget, A.L., & Dierenfeld, E.S. (2008). Minerals and stork nutrition. Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine, 6th edition, Saunders, Missouri.

Blits, K.C. (1999). Aristotle: Form, Function, and Comparative Anatomy. The anatomical record (New Anat.) 257:58–63

Speer, B., & Virginia, L. (2016). Anatomy and Disorders of the Beak and oral cavity of birds. Vet Clin Exot Anim 19, 707–73

Lacasse, C. (2015). Falconiformes (Falcons, Hawks, Eagles, Kites, Harriers, Buzzards, Ospreys, Caracaras, Secretary Birds, Old World and New World Vultures). Fowler’s Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine, 8, 127-142.

Denbow, D.M. (2000). Gastrointestinal anatomy and physiology. Sturkie’s avian physiology, fifth edition, ch.12, 299-325.

Klaphake, E., & Clancy, J. (2005). Raptor gastroenterology. Vet. Clin. Exotic Anim., 8, 307-327.

Samour, J., & Naldo, J. (2007). Anatomical and Clinical Radiology of Birds of Prey, including interactive advanced anatomical imaging. Saunders Elsevier, United Arab Emirates.

McLelland, J. (1989). Anatomy of the avian cecum. The journal of experimental zoology supliment, 3, 2-9.

Kardong, K.V. (2011). Vertebrates comparative anatomy. McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/ Mat Ed., Singapore.

Klasing, K.K. (1999). Avian gastrointestinal anatomy and Physiology. Seminars in Avian and Exotic Pet Medicine, 8 (2).

King, A.S., & McLelland, J. (1984). Birds: their structure and function. Second edition, The Ptman Press, 84-109.

Larson, E.J. (2006). Evolution: The remarkable History of a Scientific Theory. Modern Library Chronicles.

Murray, M. (2014). Raptor gastroenterology, Vet. Clin. Exot. Anim., 17, 211-234.

Clench, M.H. (1999). The avian cecum: update and motility review, Journal of Experimental Zoology 283, 441-447.

Barton, N.W.H., & Houston, D.C. (1993). A comparison of digestive efficiency in birds of prey. International Journal of avian science, 135, 363-371.

Peck, AL. (1983). Aristotle. In Goold GP, editor. Parts of animals. The Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard, 401–405.

Ford, S. (2010). Raptor gastroenterology. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine, 19 (2).

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

PREJA, A.-I., POP, C. C., MOLDOVAN, I., STERMIN, A. N., & DAMIAN, A. (2021). Comparative analysis of the digestive system’s anatomical parts in two zoophagous bird species: White Stork (Ciconia ciconia) and Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo). Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Biologia, 66(2), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbbiol.2021.2.02

Issue

Section

Articles