Study on Coaches’ and Athletes’ Attitude Towards the Consumption of Doping Substances

Authors

  • Claudia BERBECARU Department of Sports and Motor Performance, National University of Physical Education and Sports, Bucharest, Romania. Email: c.berbecaru@anad.gov.ro.
  • Luciela VASILE Department for Teachers Training, National University of Physical Education and Sports, Bucharest, Romania. Corresponding author: c.berbecaru@anad.gov.ro.
  • Doina CROITORU Department of Sports and Motor Performance, National University of Physical Education and Sports, Bucharest, Romania. Corresponding author: c.berbecaru@anad.gov.ro. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9940-8123
  • Monica STĂNESCU Department of Sports and Motor Performance, National University of Physical Education and Sports, Bucharest, Romania. Corresponding author: c.berbecaru@anad.gov.ro. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3704-335X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeag.69(2).14

Keywords:

coaches, athletes, anti-doping, doping substances

Abstract

Doping continues to attract the attention of specialists in the field of Sports Science due to its frequency of occurrence and the need for scientific substantiation of educational interventions. In all the conditional factors of doping behaviour, coaches and athletes are the key factors. Coaches are often identified as a potential enabler in athletes' doping, but precisely for this reason, they continue to be identified with their status as important potential agents in doping prevention. In turn, the athlete is the product of his own development and social-educational-cultural factors. The behavior of rejection or acceptance of the use of prohibited substances is determined by internal, subjective factors and external, social-environmental factors. An extensive model of risk factors, at international level, shows that interventions are needed at different levels for the educational effect to increase. In order to identify the attitude of coaches and athletes working in the Romanian sports system, between February and April 2022, online, with the help of Google forms, two questionnaires about anti-doping knowledge and attitudes were applied, one for athletes and one for coaches. The analysis of the results found that experienced coaches are better informed and have objective views on the impact of doping in sport. On the other hand, athletes resort to doping under peer pressure, lack of time required for training and as a result of competition pressure. Knowledge of these attitudinal peculiarities allows the formulation of recommendations on educational activities in the field of anti-doping education.

Studiu privind atitudinea antrenorilor și sportivilor față de consumul de substanțe dopante. Fenomenul dopajului continuă să atragă atenția specialiștilor din domeniul Științei Sportului care urmare a frecvenței de apariție a acestuia și nevoii de fundamentare științifică a intervențiilor educative. În ansamblul factorilor condiționali ai comportamentului doping, antrenorii și sportivii reprezintă factorii esențiali. Antrenorii sunt adesea identificați ca un potențial factor favorizant în fenomenul de dopaj al sportivilor, dar tocmai din acest motiv, ei continuă să fie identificați și cu statutul de agenți potențiali importanți în prevenirea dopajului. La rândul său, sportivul este produsul propriei dezvoltări şi al factorilor sociali-educaţionali-culturali. Comportamentul de respingere sau de acceptare a folosirii substanţelor interzise este determinat de factorii interni, subiectivi şi factorii externi, sociali-ambientali. Un model extins al factorilor de risc, la nivel internațional, arată că intervențiile sunt necesare la diferite niveluri, pentru ca efectul educațional să sporească. Pentru identificarea atitudinii antrenorilor și sportivilor care activează în sistemul sportiv din România, în perioada februarie-aprilie 2022, online, cu ajutorul Google forms, au fost aplicate două chestionare despre cunoștințe și atitudini anti-doping, unul pentru sportivi și unul pentru antrenori. În urma analizei rezultatelor, s-a constatat că antrenorii cu experiență sunt mai bine informați și au opinii obiective privind impactul dopajului în sport. Pe de altă parte, sportivii apelează la dopaj la presiunea colegilor, a lipsei timpului necesar pentru pregătire și ca urmare a presiunii concursului. Cunoașterea acestor particularități atitudinale permite formularea unor recomandări privind activitățile educaționale în domeniul educației antidoping.

Cuvinte-cheie: antrenori, sportivi, anti-doping, substanțe dopante

Article history: Received: 2024 April 26; Revised 2024 August 16; Accepted 2024 August 28;

Available online: 2024 August 30; Available print: 2024 August 30

References

Allen, J., Dimeo, P., Morris, R., Dixon, S., & Robinson, L. (2012). Precipitating or prohibiting factor? Examining coaches' perspectives of their role in doping and anti-doping. School of Sport, University of Stirling, https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/social-science-research/precipitating-or-prohibiting-factor-examining-coaches.

Berbecaru, C. et al., (2008). Athletes' attitude towards doping substance consumption. International Conference “Current challenges in anti-doping activity”, Bucharest.

Boardley, I. (2017). The effects of permitted forms of performance enhancement on determinants of doping in UK student-athletes, https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/social-science-research/effects-permitted-forms-performance-enhancement-determinants.

Bull, S.J. (coord.) (2011) Psihologia sportului, Ghid pentru optimizarea performanțelor. Editura Trei.

Casado, A. (2020). Attitudes, intentions and behavior toward doping among athletics in Spain: a combination of quantitative and experimental studies. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/social-science-research/attitudes-intentions-and-behavior-toward-doping-among-athletics.

Crăciun, M. (2005) Introducere în psihologia sportului, Editura Risoprint.

Crăciun, M. (2014) Psihologia sportului pentru antrenori. Editura Risoprint, ClujNapoca.

Dodan, M. (2004) Structuri psiho-evolutive privind construirea imaginii de sine a sportivilor de performanță, Editura SemnE, București.

Donovan, R., Jalleh, G., & Gucciardi, D. (2015). Research package, including a standard questionnaire, to assist anti-doping organizations (ADOs) measure athletes' beliefs and behaviors with respect to doping, and to assess the effectiveness of anti-doping programs, August. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/research-package-anti-doping-organizations-ados.

Epuran, M. (1991) Curajul şi riscul. Eseu. Revista Sportul de Performanţă, Centrul de Cercetări pentru Problemele Sportului, Bucureşti, Nr. 320, oct.

Epuran, M. (2007) Factori de risc. Revista Sport curat, Bucureşti, ANAD, n.d.

Henning, A, & Dimeo, A. (). Perceptions of legitimacy, attitudes and buy-in among athlete groups: a cross-national qualitative investigation providing practical solutions. Report compiled for the World Anti-Doping Agency, Social Science Research Scheme. https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/ssr_dimeo-henning.pdf.

Holdevici, I. (2000) Ameliorarea performanțelor individuale prin tehnici de psihoterapie, Editura Orizonturi.

Khurtsidze, S. (2021). Identification and analyses the role of Athlete support Personnel's (ASP) attitudes towards doping. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/identification-and-analyses-role-athlete-support-personnels-asp-attitudes-towards-doping.

Mills, J. (2019). Examining the Role of Personal Ethics in Athlete and Stakeholder Perceptions of Anti-Doping. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/social-science-research/examining-role-personal-ethics-athlete-and-stakeholder.

Muwonge, H. (2020). Supplements, herbs and doping products usage among Uganda athletes and coaches. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/social-science-research/supplements-herbs-and-doping-products-usage-among-uganda-athlete.

Ntoumanis, N. (2016). A cross-cultural investigation of the effects of coach motivational strategies on athlete doping behaviors: Direct and indirect relations. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/social-science-research/cross-cultural-investigation-effects-coach-motivational.

Patterson, L.B. (2020). Understanding and influencing global coach anti-doping education through the development of an International Framework. https://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/id/eprint/7517/7/UnderstandingAndInfluencingGlobalCoachAntiDopingEducation-PATTERSON.pdf.

Patterson, L.B., Backhouse, S.H. & Lara-Bercial, S. (2019). Examining coaches' experiences and opinions of anti-doping education. International Sport Coaching Journal, Vol.6, Issue 2, pp. 145 - 159. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2018-0008.

Petróczi, A., Aldman, E. (2008) Psychological drivers in doping: The life-cycle model of performance enhancement. Substance Abuse, Treatement, Prevention, and Policy. 3:7 https://doi.org/10.1186%2F1747-597X-3-7.

Rus, C.M., & Radu, L.E. (2014). The implications of physical education and sport in the moral education of high school students. Journal of Research and Social Intervention. 45, 45-55, https://www.proquest.com/docview/1665210267?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true.

Vâjială, G., Stănescu, M., Epuran, M., Potzaichin, I., & Berbecaru, C. (2008). Doping attitudes and behaviors in Romanian coaches. International Conference “Current challenges in anti-doping activity”, Bucharest, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814048447.

Van Noorden, T. (2019). Using the influence of coaches, parents, and peers on adolescent elite athletes' doping cognitions to enhance doping prevention effectiveness. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/social-science-research/using-influence-coaches-parents-and-peers-adolescent-elite.

Vâjială, G., Epuran, M., Stănescu, M., Potzaichin, I., Berbecaru, C. (2009). Relation between motivation and temptation for using doping substances in high performance sports. Ovidius University Annals, Series Physical Education and Sport / SCIENCE, MOVEMENT AND HEALTH, Vol. 10 ISSUE 2, 2010, Romania Our JOURNAL is nationally acknowledged by C.N.C.S.I.S., being included in the B+ category publications, 2008-2010, https://www.analefefs.ro/anale-fefs/2010/issue-2/pe-autori/15.pdf.

Vâjială, G.E (2008). Risk Factors within Doping Behavior Related to Personality Structure and Social Environment of the Athletes. WADA Report https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/risk-factors-within-doping-behavior-related-personality-structure-and-social-environment.

Vâjială, G.E., Lamor, M. (2002) Doping, Antidoping, Editura Fest, București, https://www.libris.ro/doping-antidoping-graziela-elena-vajiala-mia-fes973-85143-5-5.html.

WADA (with endorsement of the WADA Education Committee and the WADA Social Science Research Expert Advisory Group) (2022). Athlete Vulnerabilities Research Project, Descriptive Report on Sport Stakeholders' Beliefs About Athlete Doping Vulnerabilities and Related Factors. March, https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/2022-03/Descriptive%20Report%20-%20Athlete%20Vulnerabilties%20-%2023-03-2022.pdf.

WADA (2021). International Standard for Education, https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/international_standard_ise_2021.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-30

How to Cite

BERBECARU, C. ., VASILE, L. ., CROITORU, D. ., & STĂNESCU, M. . (2024). Study on Coaches’ and Athletes’ Attitude Towards the Consumption of Doping Substances. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Educatio Artis Gymnasticae, 69(2), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeag.69(2).14

Issue

Section

Articles