POLITICAL BOUNDEDNESS AND THE ROLE OF CARTOGRAPHY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2020.2.01

Keywords:

Boundaries, space, nation, state, cartography, line

Abstract

I will question the legitimacy of borders via its underlying premise: the supposedly natural boundedness of communities. Two avenues are usually used to show the legitimacy and necessity of borders: either as a way to protect and preserve the conception of the good and the values of an already existing bounded community; or as a way to create a democratic polity, the limits of which are required to uphold the rights of citizens. Either way, what is presupposed is that communities are and/or should be bounded. I will argue that the arguments in favour of political boundedness do not hold up to scrutiny, least of all in the form of territorial borders. This will lead me to a discussion on the precedence of the graphic gesture of drawing the line, and hence on the violence of boundary-making.

References

Abizadeh, Arash (2005), “Does Collective Identity Presuppose an Other? On the Alleged Incoherence of Global Solidarity”, in The American Political Science Review, vol. 99, No. 1, 45-60.

Abizadeh, Arash (2008), “Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders”, in Political Theory, Vol. 36, No. 1, 37-65.

Lord Acton (1862), “Nationality”, in The Home and Foreign Review, reproduced in http://www.panarchy.org/acton/nationality.html.

Anderson, Benedict (2006), Imagined Communities, London: Verso.

Appiah, Kwame Anthony (1994), Race, Culture, Identity: Misunderstood Connections, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, University of California at San Diego.

Balibar, Etienne (2011), “The Nation-Form: History and Ideology” in Race, Nation, Class – Ambiguous identities, London: Verso, 86-106.

Baudrillard, Jean (1983), Simulations, transl. Paul Foss, Paul Patton, and Philip Beitchman, New York: Semiotext.

Baumann, Zygmunt (1992), “Soil, Blood, Identity”, in The Sociological Review, unpaged.

Beck, Ulrich (2005), “The Cosmopolitan State: Redefining Power in the Global Age”, in International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, Vol. 18, No. 3/4, The New Sociological Imagination, 143-159.

Benjamin, Walter (1996), “Critique of Violence”, in Selected Writings, Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Branch, Jordan (2014), The Cartographic State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Buber, Martin (1963), Israel and the World: Essays in a Time of Crisis, New York: Schocken.

Cohen, Jean L. (1999), “Changing Paradigms of Citizenship and the Exclusiveness of the Demos”, in International Sociology, vol. 14 (3), 35-60.

Descombes, Vincent (2013), Les Embarras de l’identité, Paris : NRF.

Ford, Richard (1999), “Law's Territory (A History of Jurisdiction)”, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 4, 843-930.

Kymlicka, Will (1995), Multicultural Citizenship – A Theory of Minority Rights, Clarendon: Oxford.

Latour, Bruno (1986), “Visualisation and cognition”, in H. Kuklick (ed.) Knowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, Jai Press, vol. 6, 207-213.

Margalit, Avishai; Raz, Joseph (1990), “National Self-Determination”, in Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 87, No. 9, 439-461.

Miller, David (1999), “In What Sense Must Socialism Be Communitarian?”, in Social Philosophy & Policy, No. 6, 51-73.

Mouffe, Chantal (1993), The Return of the Political, London: Verso.

Mouffe, Chantal (2000), The Democratic Paradox, London: Verso.

Ong, Walter J. (1956), “System, Space, and Intellect in Renaissance Symbolism,” in Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance, vol. 18, 222-239.

Pocock, John G. A. (1992), “The Ideal of Citizenship since Classical Times”, in Queen’s Quarterly, 99/1, 33–55.

Renan, Ernest (1992 [1882]), What is a Nation?, transl. Ethan Rundell, Paris: Presses-Pocket.

Schmitt, Carl (1996), The Concept of the Political, transl. George Schwab, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Schmitt, Carl (2003), Nomos of the Earth, Transl. G.L. Ulmen, New York: Telos Press.

Schnapper, Dominique (1993), La Communauté des citoyens: Sur l’idée moderne de nation, Paris : Gallimard.

Strandsbjerg, Jeppe (2008), “The Cartographic Production of Territorial Space: Mapping and State Formation in Early Modern Denmark”, in Geopolitics, 13(2), 335-358.

Tamir, Yael (1993), Liberal Nationalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Taylor, Charles (1992), “The Politics of Recognition”, in Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Waldron, Jeremy (1992), “Minority Cultures and the Cosmopolitan Alternative”, in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, Vol. 25, 751-793.

Walzer, Michael (1992), “The New Tribalism: Notes on a Difficult Problem”, in Dissent, n˚ 39, 164-171.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

HABBARD, A.-C. (2020). POLITICAL BOUNDEDNESS AND THE ROLE OF CARTOGRAPHY. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Europaea, 65(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2020.2.01

Issue

Section

Articles