PAST IMPERFECT: HISTORY, IDEOLOGY, AND THE CULTURE OF CONSPIRACY IN OLIVER STONE’S PRESIDENTIAL TRILOGY
Keywords:
Oliver Stone, conspiracy theory, cinematic history, revisionism, JFK, Nixon, George W. Bush, political film, ideologyAbstract
The present study is an attempt to analyse the representation of history in Oliver Stone’s presidential films – JFK (1991), Nixon (1995) and W. (2008). All three films can be regarded as examples of conspiracy theory, a theme that is often present in the American director’s works. The paper will also try to discuss whether these films can be considered legitimate interpretations of history, considering the impact that cinematic historical representations have in contemporary society. Critics have often argued that revisionist interpretations of history are rooted in Oliver Stone’s leftist personal ideology that makes him always question the established political order. The paper discusses in turn each of the three films, arguing that JFK is Stone’s most obvious attempt to formulate a revisionist history of the Kennedy assassination, Nixon is a powerful biopic portraying its protagonist as a flawed tragic hero, while W. is a less coherent and somewhat disappointing cinematic narrative of the life and presidency of George W. Bush.
References
-----------. “From Man to Mockery, and Back Again”. Newsweek, online edition, http://www.thedailybeast.com/
newsweek/2008/10/10/from-man-to-mockery-and-back-again.print.html (accessed on February 29, 2012).
Arnold, Gordon B., (2008), Conspiracy Theory in Film, Television and Politics. Westport: Praeger.
Barta, Tony, (1998), “Screening the Past: History since the Cinema”, in Barta, Tony (ed.), Screening the Past. Film and the Representation of History, Westport: Praeger, 1998, 1-18.
Booker, M. Keith (2007), From Box Office to Ballot Box: The American Political Film. Westport and London: Praeger.
Breznican, Anthony, (2008), “First Look: Oliver Stone’s W. Is Not Quite Out of Left Field”. USA Today, September 24.
Carlson, Michael, (2002), The Pocket Essential Oliver Stone. Harpenden: Pocket Essentials.
Cockburn, Alexander (2000), “JFK and JFK”, in Bomley, Carl (ed.), Cinema Nation. The Best Writing on Film from The Nation. 1913-2000, New York: Nation Books, 285-298.
Cook, David, (1996), A History of Narrative Film, 3rd edition. New York: Norton.
Corliss, Richard, (2008), “Oliver Stone’s Verdict on George W.” Time, October 13.
Davies, Philip John; Wells, Paul, editors (2002), American Film and Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
DiMare, Philip C., editor, (2011), Movies in American History. An Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio.
Ephron, Nora, (2000), “The Tie that Binds”, in Cinema Nation. The Best Writing on Film from The Nation. 1913-2000, New York: Nation Books, 293-295.
Gianos, Philip L., (1998), Politics and Politicians in American Film. Westport: Praeger.
Guynn, William, (2006), Writing History in Film. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Hughes-Warrington, Marnie, (2007), History Goes to the Movies: Studying History on Film. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Kaes, Anton, (1992), “History as Film. Public Memory in the Age of Electronic Dissemination”, in Murray, Bruce A., Wickham, Christopher J. (eds.), Framing the Past. The Historiography of German Cinema and Television, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 308-326.
Kaes, Anton, (1992), From Hitler to Heimat: the Return of History as Film. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Matthews, Christopher, (1998), “New Tapes Debunk Oliver Stone’s Nixon”. San Francisco Chronicle, January 1.
Nesselson, Lisa. “Oliver Stone Discusses His Film Nixon”, http://www.parisvoice.com/-archives-97-86/295-oliver-stone-discusses-his-film-qnixon (accessed February 25, 2012).
Pendergast, Tom; Pendergast, Sara, eds., (2000), International Dictionary of Films and Filmmakers – Volume 2 (Directors), 4th edition. New York: St. James Press.
Rommel-Ruiz, W. Bryan, (2011), American History Goes to the Movies. Hollywood and the American Experience. New York and London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Rosenstone, Robert A., (2006), History on Film / Film on History. London: Pearson Longman.
Rosenstone, Robert, (1988), “History in Images / History in Words: Reflections on the Possibility of Really Putting History into Film”, in American Historical Review no. 93, 173-85.
Rosenstone, Robert, (1995), Visions of the Past: The Challenge of Film to Our Understanding of History. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Solomon, Jon. (2010), “The Popular Reception of Alexander”, in Cartledge, Paul, Greenland, Fiona Rose (eds.), Responses to Oliver Stone’s Alexander: Film, History and Cultural Studies, Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 36-54.
Stone, Oliver, (2010), “Afterword”, in Cartledge, Paul, Greenland, Fiona Rose (eds.), Responses to Oliver Stone’s Alexander: Film, History and Cultural Studies, Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 337-352.
Stone, Oliver, (2000), “Stone on Stone's Image”, in Toplin, Robert Brent (ed.), Oliver Stone's USA: Film, History, Controversy, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 45-53.
Stone, Oliver, (2001), Interviews. Mississippi: University Press of Mississippi.
Thomas, Evan, (1995), “Whose Obsession Is It, Anyway?” Newsweek, December 10.
Von Tunzelmann, Alex, (2010), “Nixon: Oliver Stone's Tricky Dicky Flick Is Far from Unimpeachable”. The Guardian, June 3.
Walkowitz, Daniel J., (1998), “Re-screening the Past: Subversion Narratives and the Politics of History”, in Barta, Tony (ed.), Screening the Past, Westport: Praeger, 45-62.
White, Hayden, (1988), “Historiography and Historiophoty”, in American Historical Review, no. 93, 193-99.
-----------, (1991), “Twisted History”. In Newsweek, December 22.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Europaea
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
