LEGITIMACY, DEMOCRACY, CONTESTATION: INTRODUCING THE BRAZILIAN FORMULA FOR GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
Keywords:
global governance, international institutions, legitimacy, Brazilian foreign policyAbstract
In this paper, the process of international legitimation is assessed from an International Relations standpoint, namely from the perspective adopted by international institutionalism, taking intergovernmental bodies as venues where political contestation to a state of (world) affairs might take place within a certain set of rules and procedures, in a somewhat orderly fashion. Institutional contestation grants legitimacy to the global order to the extent that it absorbs much of the criticism and demands voiced out by states and non-state actors, transforming the world order from the inside and accommodating tensions and dissatisfactions. In this sense, recent Brazilian foreign policy attitudes towards the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) membership reform, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) quota share distribution, and the World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement mechanism, exemplify the idea of international legitimacy production by way of institutional contestation.
References
Abbott, Kenneth; Snidal, Duncan (1997), “Why states act through formal international organizations?” in Journal of Conflict Resolution.
Alger, Coate (2010), “Expanding Governmental Diversity in Global Governance” in Global Governance 16, 2010, 59-79.
Amorim, Celso (2011a), “Discurso por ocasião da transmissão do cargo de ministro de Estado das Relações Exteriores”, in: Amorim, C. Discursos, Palestras e Artigos do Chanceler Celso Amorim: 2003-2010. Brasília: Ministério das Relações Exteriores.
Amorim, Celso (2011b), “Brazil and the Middle East”, Cairo Review.
Auvachez, Elise (2009), “Supranational citizenship building and the United Nations” in Global Governance, 15, 43-57.
Barbé, Ester (2008), Relaciones Internacionales, Madri, Tecnos.
Barnett, Michael; Finnemore, Martha (2004), Rules for the World, Cornell University Press.
Barral, Welber (org.) (2007), Solução de Controvérsias na Organização Mundial do Comércio, Brasília: Funag.
Barton, John et al. (2006), The Evolution of the Trade Regime, Princeton University Press.
Belém-Lopes, Dawisson (2007), “A ONU tem autoridade?” in Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, v. 50, n. 1.
Belém-Lopes, Dawisson (2012), A ONU entre o Passado e o Futuro, Curitiba, Appris.
Belém-Lopes, Dawisson; Casarões, Guilherme (2010), “Can International Organizations Be Democratic? Rethinking Robert Dahl’s Skeptical Argument”. Trabalho apresentado no 60º Encontro Anual da Associação de Estudos Políticos do Reino Unido (UK PSA). Edimburgo, Escócia, março/abril de 2010.
Belém-Lopes, Dawisson; Gama, Carlos (2009), “‘Bem me queres, mal me queres’: ambivalência discursiva na avaliação canônica do desempenho da ONU”, Revista de Sociologia e Política, v. 17, n. 33.
Bexell, Magdalena; Tallberg, Jonas; Uhlin, Anders (2010), “Democracy in Global Governance”, Global Governance, n. 16, 81-101.
Blank, S.J. (2010), “Russia's Prospects in Asia”, Retrieved from http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB1032.pdf, Access on 31 January 2012.
Bull, Hedley (1977), The Anarchical Society, Londres, Macmillan.
Burges, Sean (2008), “Consensual Hegemony: theorizing Brazilian foreign policy after the Cold War” in International Relations, vol. 22, no. 1.
Carranza, M. E. (2003), “Can Mercosur survive? Domestic and international constraints on Mercosu” in Latin American Politics and Society, v. 45, n. 2.
Carvalho, Maria (2010), “Condicionantes internacionais e domésticos: o Brasil e o G-20 nas negociações agrícolas da Rodada Doha”, Dados, vol. 53, no. 2.
Chari, C. (2010), Superpower Rivalry and Conflict - The Long Shadow of the twenty-first century, London, Routledge.
Claude, Inis (1956), Swords into plowshares: the problems and progress of international organization, Nova York: Random House.
Cooper, Andrew et al. (1993), Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a changing world order. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Couto, Cláudio and Abrucio, Fernando (2003), “O Segundo Governo FHC: coalizões, agendas e instituições” in Tempo Social, vol. 15, no. 2.
Cox, Robert (1996), “Middlepowermanship: Japan and the future of the world order” in Cox, R. and Sinclair, T. (eds), Approaches to World Order, Cambridge: CUP.
Dahl, Robert (1999), “Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic's view” in Shapiro, I. and Hacker-Cordón, C. (eds.), Democracy's Edges, Cambridge: CUP.
Dahl, Robert (2005), Poliarquia, São Paulo: Edusp.
Dahrendorf, Ralf (1999), “The Third Way and liberty” in Foreign Affairs 78, n. 5 (September/October), pp. 13-17.
Dantas, San Tiago (2011), Política Externa Independente, Brasília, Funag.
Drezner, D. (2010), The Tragedy of the Global Institutional Commons, Retrieved from http://www.danieldrezner.com/research/InstitutionalProliferation.pdf, Access on 17 March 2013.
Elster, Jon (2007), Explaining Social Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press.
Farias, Rogério (2012), ‘Industriais, economistas e diplomatas: o Brasil e as negociações comerciais multilaterais (1946-1967)’. Doctoral thesis, International Relations Graduation Program, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2012.
Flemes, Daniel (2007), “Emerging Middle Powers’ Soft Balancing Strategy: state and perspectives of the IBSA Dialogue Forum”, GIGA Working Papers, no. 57.
Flemes, Daniel (2010), “O Brasil na iniciativa BRIC: soft balancing numa ordem global em mudança?” in Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, vol. 53, no. 1.
Fonseca Jr., Gelson (2008), O Interesse e a Regra, São Paulo: Ed. Paz e Terra.
Gama, Carlos (2009), “Bridge over Troubled Waters: United Nations, Peace Operations and Human Security” in Journal of Human Security, v.5, 9-31.
Garcia, Eugênio (2012), O Sexto Membro Permanente, Rio de Janeiro, Contraponto.
Gonçalves, Williams (2011), “Panorama da Política Externa Brasileira no governo Lula da Silva”, in Freixo A. et al. (orgs.), A política externa brasileira na era Lula: um balanço, Rio de Janeiro: Apicuri.
Habermas, Jürgen (1998), La Constelación Posnacional, Barcelona, Paidós.
Hague, Rod and Harrop, Martin (2004), Comparative Government and Politics, New York, Palgrave.
Hall, Rodney and Biersteker, Thomas (2002), The Emergence of Private Authority, Cambridge, CUP.
Hardin, Garrett (1968), “The Tragedy of the Commons” in Science, New Series, Vol. 162, No. 3859. (Dec. 13, 1968), 1243-1248.
Hasenclever, Rittberger et al. (1997), Theories of International Regimes, Cambridge: CUP.
Hawkins, Darren et al. (org.) (2006), Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, Cambridge: CUP.
Held, David (2004), Global Covenant, Oxford: Polity Press.
Hermet, Guy (2001), “A democratização dos países emergentes e as relações entre o Estado, as OIGs e as ONGs” in Milani, C. et al. (org.), Democracia e Governança Mundial, Porto Alegre: Editora da Universidade (UFRGS).
Hoekman, Bernard and Mavroidis, Petros (2007), WTO: Law, Economics, and Politics, New York: Routledge.
Howse, Robert (2001), “The legitimacy of the World Trade Organization” in Coicaud, J.-M. e Heiskanen, V. (org.), op. cit.
Hurrell, Andrew (2008), “Lula’s Brazil: a rising power, but going where?” in Current History, February.
International Monetary Fund (2013), Data from the official website www.imf.br, Access on 17 March 2013.
Jacobson, Harold (1979), Networks of Interdependence, New York: Alfred Knopf.
Jain, S.C. (2006), Emerging Economies and the Transformation of International Business - Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRICs), Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Kahler, Miles (1992), “Multilateralism with small and large numbers” in International Organization, 46 (3).
Karns, Margarth and Mingst, Karen (2004), International Organizations, London: Rienner.
Kazancigil, Ali (2001), “A regulação social e a governança democrática da globalização” in Milani, C. et al. (org.), op. cit.
Keck, Margareth (2004), “Governance Regimes and the Politics of Discursive Representation” in Piper, N. e Uhlin, A. (org.), Transnational Activism in Asia, Londres: Routledge.
Kennedy, Paul (2007), The Parliament of Man, New York: Random House.
Keohane, Robert (1969), “Lilliputians’ Dilemmas: small states in international politics” in International Organization, vol. 23.
Keohane, Robert (1984), After Hegemony, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert et al. (2009), “Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism” in International Organization, n. 63, pp. 1-31.
Krasner, Stephen (org.) (1983), International Regimes, Stanford: Stanford University.
Kurlantzick, J. (2007), Charm Offensive - How China's Soft Power is Transforming the World, Yale: Yale University Press.
Li, M (2009), Soft Power - China's Emerging Strategy in International Politics, New York: Lexington.
Lima, Maria; Hirst, Monica (2006), “Brazil as an intermediate state and regional power: action, choice and responsibilities” in International Affairs, vol. 82, no. 1.
Mackinnon, A. and Powell, B. (2008), China Calling: A Foot in the Global Door, Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Marchetti, Rafaelle (2012), “Modeling Transnational Politics”. Paper apresentado no 22º Congresso Mundial da Associação Internacional de Ciência Política (IPSA). Madrid, Espanha, julho de 2012.
Marks, Susan (2001), “Democracy and international governance” in Coicaud, J.-M. e Heiskanen, V. (org.), The Legitimacy of International Organizations, Tóquio: UNU.
Moura Gerson (1990), O Alinhamento Sem Recompensa: a política externa do governo Dutra, Rio de Janeiro: Centro de Pesquisa e Documentação de História Contemporânea do Brasil.
Nasar, Sylvia (2012), A Imaginação Econômica, São Paulo, Companhia das Letras.
O’Brien, Robert et al. (2000), Contesting Global Governance, Cambridge: CUP.
Oliveira, Amancio et al. (2006), “Coalizões Sul-Sul e Multilateralismo: Índia, Brasil e África do Sul,” Contexto Internacional, vol. 28, no. 2.
Oliveira, Marcelo (2005), “Alianças e coalizões internacionais do governo Lula: o Ibas e o G-20,”, Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, vol. 48, no. 2.
Onuf, Nicholas (1998), The republican legacy in international thought, Cambridge: CUP.
Pape, Robert (2005), “Soft Balancing against the United States” in International Security, vol. 30, no. 1.
Pecequilo, Cristina (2010), “A New Strategic Dialogue: Brazil-US relations in Lula’s presidency (2003-2010)” in Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, vol. 53, special edition.
Pereira, João (2010), O Banco Mundial como Ator Político, Intelectual e Financeiro, Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
Pereira, L. B. (2011), “Turkey, Brazil and New Geopolitics of the World”, Bilgesam: Wise Men Center for Strategic Studies, Available at http://www.bilgesam.org/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=437:turkey-brazil-and-new-geopolitics-of-the-world-&catid=89:analizler-latinamerika&Itemid=139.
Peterson, M. J. (2009), The UN General Assembly, Londres: Routledge.
Pieterse, J.N. and Rehbein, B. (2009), Emerging Societies - Development and Inequality, Basingstoke: Palgrave-MacMillan.
Ramamurti, R. and Singh, J.V. (2009), Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reis, Fabio (2010), “Democracia, política externa e relevância” in Política Externa, São Paulo, Ed. Paz e Terra, set/out/nov 2010.
Rosenau, James and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto (1992), Governança sem Governo, Brasília: Editora UnB.
Ruggie, John (1982), “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order”, International Organization, Volume 36, Issue 2, International Regimes (Spring, 1982), 379-415.
Ruggie, John (1993), Multilateralism matters – The theory and praxis of an institutional form, Columbia: Columbia University Press.
Saraiva, José (2010), “The new Africa and Brazil in the Lula era: the rebirth of Brazilian Atlantic Policy” in Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, vol. 53, special edition.
Singer, Peter (2004), Um Só Mundo, São Paulo, Martins Fontes.
Singh, Nagendra (2003), “The UN and the Development of International Law” in Kingsbury, B. e Roberts, A. (org.), United Nations, Divided World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
United Nations (2010), Data from the official website www.un.org, Access on 17 March 2010.
Vargas, João (2009), Campanha Permanente, Rio de Janeiro, FGV.
Vieira, Marco and Alden, Chris (2011), “India, Brazil, and South Africa (IBSA): South-South cooperation and the paradox of regional leadership”, Global Governance 17.
Vigevani, Tullo and Cepaluni, Gabriel (2007), “Lula’s foreign policy and the quest for autonomy through diversification” in Third World Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1.
Vigevani, Tullo et al. (2003), “Política Externa no Governo FHC: a busca da autonomia pela integração” in Tempo Social, vol. 15, no. 2.
Visentini, Paulo (2011), “Brazil’s Contemporary Foreign Policy: an affirmative agenda”. In Hofmeister, W. (ed). G20: perceptions and perspectives for global governance, Singapore: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
Vreeland, James (2007), The International Monetary Fund, London and New York: Routledge.
Wade, R.H. (2011), “Emerging World Order - From Multipolarity to Multilateralism in the G20, the World Bank and IMF” in Politics and Society, 39, 347-369.
Walt, Stephen (2005), Taming American Power, New York: W.W. Norton.
Waltz, Kenneth (1979), Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw Hill.
Wendt, Alexander (1995), “Constructing International Politics” in International Security, vol. 20, no. 1.
Wendt, Alexander (1996), Social Theory of International Relations, Cambridge: CUP.
Wight, Martin (1966), “Why is there no international theory?”, in Wight, M. e Butterfield, H. (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations, London, Unwin.
Woods, Ngaire (2006), The Globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank, and their Borrowers, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
World Bank (2013), Data from the official website www.worldbank.org, Access on 17 March 2013.
World Trade Organization (2013), Data from the official website www.wto.org, Access on 17 March 2013.
Young, Oran (1999), Governance in World Affairs, Cornell University Press.
Zweifel, Thomas (2006), International Organizations and Democracy, Londres: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Europaea
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.