Strategies for Student Evaluation in The Online Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbi.2021.2.06Keywords:
student evaluation, formal concept analysis, online learningAbstract
In this paper we conducted an investigation on the performance of the students during the second semester of the academic year 2020-2021. We looked at the performance results obtained by students on the laboratory work, practical and final exams while we were forced by the Covid pandemic to move entirely into an online education system. Our focus was to determine the impact of a consistent behaviour (or lack of it) on the final student performance. We determined that, even in an online setting, a good involvement (in terms of attendance and good performance) guarantees good final results. The investigations were performed using the Formal Concept Analysis, which is a very powerful instrument already used by us in previous research in order to detect student behaviour in using an e-learning portal. Another set of results showed that the change of the final mark computation formula to be based in a higher proportion on the lab work was closer to the actual overall performance of students.
Received by the editors: 9 November 2021.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 68T30, 68P20.
1998 CR Categories and Descriptors. H.3.5 [Information Storage and Retrieval]:Online Information Services – Web based services; I.2.6 [Artificial Intelligence]: Learning – Knowledge acquisition; K.3.1 [Computers and Education]: Computer Uses in Education – Distance learning.
References
M. Adnan and K. Anwar, Online Learning amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Students’ Perspectives, Online Submission, vol. 2, no.1, 2020, pp. 45-51.
S. Dhawan, Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol, 49, no. 1, September 2020, pp. 5-22.
S. (Avram) Dragos, , PULSE - a PHP Utility used in Laboratories for Student Evaluation, in International Conference on Informatics Education Europe II (IEEII), November 2007, pp. 306–314.
S. (Avram) Dragos, , D. Halit,˘a, and C. S˘ac˘area, Attractors in Web Based Educational Systems a Conceptual Knowledge Processing Grounded Approach, in Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management, Springer, October 2015, pp. 190–195.
S. (Avram) Dragos, , D. Halit,˘a, and C. S˘ac˘area, Distilling Conceptual Structures from Weblog Data Using Polyadic FCA, in 22nd International Conference on Conceptual Structures, Springer, Cham, July 2016, pp. 151-159
S. (Avram) Dragos, , D. Halit,˘a, C. S˘ac˘area, and D. Troanc˘a, Applying Triadic FCA in Studying Web Usage Behaviors, in Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management, Springer, October 2014, pp. 73–80.
B. Ganter, and R. Wille, Formal concept analysis: mathematical foundations, Springer Science & Business Media, December 2012.
C. Hodges, S. Moore, B. Lockee, T. Trust and A. Bond, The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning, Educause review, vol. 27, no. 1, 2020, pp.1-9.
L.L. Kis, C. Sacarea and D. S, otropa, Visualizing Conceptual Structures Using FCA Tools Bundle, in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Conceptual Structures, June 2018, pp. 193 – 196.
L.L. Kis, C. Sacarea, and D. Troanca, FCA Tools Bundle-A Tool that Enables Dyadic and Triadic Conceptual Navigation, in 5th Workshop “What can FCA do for Artificial Intelligence” at ECAI, August 2016, pp. 42-50.
F. Lehmann, and R. Wille, A triadic approach to formal concept analysis, in International Conference on Conceptual Structures, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, August 1995, pp. 32-43.
J. Liebowitz and M. Frank, Knowledge management and e-learning, CRC press, April 2010.
Y. Park, Analysis of online behavior and prediction of learning performance in blended learning environments, Educational Technology International, vol. 15, no. 2, November 2014, pp. 71-88.
W. Rice, and H. William, Moodle, Birmingham: Packt publishing, 2006.
V. Singh, A. Thurman, How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018)., American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 33, no. 4, 2019, pp. 289-306.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Informatica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
