STOCHASTIC DOMINANCE ON FTSE INDEX

Authors

  • Ioan-Alin NISTOR Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Email: ioan.nistor@tbs.ubbcluj.ro https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3756-9316
  • Maria-Lenuta CIUPAC-ULICI IPAG Business School Paris, France & Commercial Academy Satu Mare, Romania, Email: ulici_maria@yahoo.com
  • Mircea-Cristian GHERMAN Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania, email: mircea-cristian.gherman@univ-orleans.fr
  • Daniela-Georgeta BEJU Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Email: daniela.beju@econ.ubbcluj.ro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbnegotia.2019.4.01

Keywords:

stochastic dominance, utility function, FTSE index.

Abstract

Stochastic dominance is a method that refers to a set of relations, which may hold between a specific pair of distributions. However, the concept can be applied in many domains, but in particular in financial economic areas, where the considered distributions are usually those of random returns to different financial assets. The aim of this paper is to provide an implementation of a stochastic dominance algorithm that establish which of more risky indices is preferred more by investors who have an aversive risk profile. The study is performed on FTSE indices. The focus is to emphasis the imbalance between FTSE regional indices and FTSE sectorial indices. The analyzed period for regional indices is April 3, 2000 –September 12, 2014. As regards the sector indices, the analyzed period is January 3, 1994 – September 12, 2014.Its relevance consist in that, it offers a different perspective for investors when choosing between different financial assets. This approach together with Meyer algorithm has been proved that it is a useful tool in risk aversion analysis.

JEL Classification: C73, D9, D53.

References

Agliardi E., Agliardi R., Pinar M., Stengos T., Topaloglou N., 2012. A new country risk index for emerging markets: A stochastic dominance approach, Journal of Empirical finance, 19, pp. 741 – 761.

Al-Khazali O., Zoubi T. A., Koumanakos E. P., 2010. The Saturday effect in emerging stock markets: a stochastic dominance approach, International Journal of Emerging Markets, Vo. 5 No.2, pp. 227-246.

Başdaş Ü., 2011. The day-of-the-week effect for Istanbul stock exchange: a stochastic dominance approach, Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, vol.1, no.4, pp. 233-238.

Chen W. N., Hsueh Y.-H., Chen Y.-T., Chang C., 2010. Investigating Seasonal Anomalies in Asian Stock Market Prices: A Stochastic Dominance Approach, International Journal of Management, Vol. 27 No.1, pp. 144-152.

Clark E., Kassimatis K., 2014. Exploiting stochastic dominance to generate abnormal stock returns, Journal of Financial Markets, 20, pp. 20–38.

Fang Y., 2012. Aggregate investor preferences and benefits in stock market: A stochastic dominance analysis, Journal of Empirical Finance, 19, pp. 528-547.

Hadar, J., Russell, W.R., 1969. Rules for orgering Uncertain prospects, American Economic Review, vol. 59, pp. 25-34.

Hanoch, G., Levy, H., 1969. The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 36, pp. 335-346.

Hsieh, C.-S., Chen C.-T., 2012. Using stochastic dominance criterion to examine the day-of-the-week effect, Applied Financial Economics, 22, pp. 1207–1213.

McCarl, B.-A., 1990. Generalized Stochastic Dominance: An empirical examination, Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 22(2), pp. 49- 55.

McCarl, B.-A., Besseler, D.-A., 1999. Estimating an upper bound on the Pratt risk aversion coefficient when the utility function is unknown, Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 33 (1), pp. 56 – 63.

McNamara, J. R., 1998. Portfolio selection using stochastic dominance criteria, Decision Sciences, 29(4), pp. 785-801.

Meyer, D., Meyer, J., 2005. Risk preferences in multi-period consumption models, the equity premium puzzle, and habit formation utility, The Journal of Monetary Economics, 8, pp. 1497–1515.

Meyer, J., Orminston, M.B., 1985. Strong Increases in Risk and Their Comparative Statics, International Economic Review, vol. 26, pp. 425 – 437.

Post T., Levy H., 2005. Does risk seeking drive stock prices? A stochastic dominance analysis of aggregate investor preferences and beliefs, The Review of Financial Studies, 18(3), pp. 925 – 953.

Qiao Z., Wong W.-K., Fung J. K. W., 2013. Stochastic dominance relationship between stock and stock index future markets: International evidence, Economic Modelling, 33, pp. 552 – 559.

Rothschild, M., Stiglitz, J., 1970. Increasing risk: A definition, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 2, pp. 225-243.

Rothschild, M., Stiglitz, J., 1971. Increasing risk: Its economic consequences, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 3, pp. 64-84.

Whitmorer, G.A., 1970, Third degree stochastic dominance, American Economic Review, vol.60, pp. 457-459.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-30

How to Cite

NISTOR, I.-A., CIUPAC-ULICI, M.-L., GHERMAN, M.-C., & BEJU, D.-G. (2019). STOCHASTIC DOMINANCE ON FTSE INDEX. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Negotia, 64(4), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbnegotia.2019.4.01

Issue

Section

Articles