ALTERNATIVE VIEWS ON THE PARTICIPATION OF NON-EURO ZONE COUNTRIES AT THE BANK UNION

Authors

  • Liliana DONATH Address: West University Timisoara, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, 16, Pestalozzi str., Tel. 0744906311, Email: liliana.donath@e-uvt.ro
  • Veronica MIHUTESCU CERNA West University Timisoara, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, 16, Pestalozzi str., Tel. 0744906311, veracerna@yahoo.com

Keywords:

macroprudential policies, Bank Union, stability, reforms

Abstract

https://doi.org/10.1515/subboec-2017-0001

The reformation of the bank systems’ regulation and supervision in The European Union was founded on a macroprudential approach to monitor systemic risks and the vulnerabilities in a more effective way. Considered as the backbone of the new macroprudential supervision architecture, the Bank Union raises intense debates among the catching up economies. The fact that there are few studies on the costs and benefits of joining the Bank Union for the Central and Eastern European countries, explains the different views of the decision makers concerning this issue. The study stresses the manner in which macroprudential policies were implemented in Romania, as a particular case among the CEE countries, and the extent of their contribution to mitigating vulnerabilities and maintaining financial stability. The paper summarises the main arguments in favour of joining the Bank Union by emphasising the Romanian monetary authorities’ stance compared to those of the neighbouring CEE countries.

JEL classification: E58

References

Allen F., Gale D. (2007) Understanding financial crises, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Bluedorn J., Ilyina A., Iossifov P. (2014) Opting Into The Banking Union Before Euro Adoption, International Monetary Fund, CCE Member States Policy Forum

Brunnermeier M., Crockett A., Goodhart C., Persaud A., Shin H., S. (2009) The Fundamental Principles of Financial Regulation, International Center for Monetary and Banking, Geneva Reports on the World Economy 11, retrieved from http://www.wyplosz.eu/ICMB/Publications_files/Geneva%2011.pdf

Claessens S. (2014) An Overview of Macroprudential Policy Tools, IMF Working Paper 14/2014

Darvas Z., Wolff G. (2013) Should non-euro area countries join the single supervisory mechanism?, Bruegel Policy Contribution, No 06, March 2013

Diamond D., Rajan R. (2011) Fear of fire sales, illiquidity seeking, and the credit freeze, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 126, pp. 557-591

Holmstrom B., Tirole J. (1997) Financial intermediation, loan able funds, and the real sector, Quarterly Journal of Economic, Vol. 112, pp. 663 691

Isărescu M. (2014) România, adoptarea euro şi Uniunea Bancară, Conferinţa Stiinţifică Anuală ERMAS 2014, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, 18 august 2014

Kuttner K.N., Shim I. (2013) Can non-interest rate policies stabilize housing markets? Evidence from a panel of 57 economies, BIS Working Paper, No 433

Lim C., Columba F., Costa A., Kongsamut P., Otani A., Saiyid M., Wezel T., Wu X. (2011) Macroprudential Policy: What Instruments and How to Use Them? Lessons from Country Experiences, IMF Working Paper, WP/11/238

Neagu F., Tatarici L., Mihai I. (2014) Implementing loan-to-value and debt to income ratios: learning from country experiences, International Monetary Fund, Monetary and Capital Markets Department project

Schoenmaker D., Siegmann A. (2013). Winners of a European Banking Union. DSF Policy

Committee on the Global Financial System (CGFS) ( 2012). Operationalising the selection and application of macroprudential instruments, Bank For International Settlements, Papers No 48, retrieved from http://www.bis.org/publ/cgfs48.pdf

European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB). (2011) Recommendation of the European Systemic Risk Board on the macroprudential mandate of national authorities (ESRB/2011/3)

European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB). (2013) Recommendation of the European Systemic Risk Board on intermediate objectives and instruments of macro prudential policy (ESRB/2013/1)

European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB). (2014a) Handbook “Operationalising Macroprudential Policy in the Banking Sector, retrieved from https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/ pdf/other/140303_esrb_handbook.pdf

European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB). (2014b) Recommendation of The European Systemic Risk Board on guidance for setting countercyclical buffer rates (ESRB/2014/1), retrieved from https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/recommendations/2014/140630;

Internaţional Monetary Fund (2017) Financial Soudness Indicators, retrieved from http://imf.org

National Bank of Romania (2013) Financial Stability Report, http://www.bnro.ro/PublicationDocuments.aspx?icid=6711

National Bank of Romania (2014) Financial Stability Report, http://www.bnro.ro/PublicationDocuments.aspx?icid=6711

National Bank of Romania (2015) Financial Stability Report, http://www.bnro.ro/PublicationDocuments.aspx?icid=6711

National Bank of Romania (2016) Financial Stability Report, april and december 2016 http://www.bnro.ro/PublicationDocuments.aspx?icid=6711

The Law on the macroprudential oversight of the financial system adopted the Parliament of Romania on 16 March 2016.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-30

How to Cite

DONATH, L., & MIHUTESCU CERNA, V. (2017). ALTERNATIVE VIEWS ON THE PARTICIPATION OF NON-EURO ZONE COUNTRIES AT THE BANK UNION. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, 62(1), 3–19. Retrieved from http://193.231.18.162/index.php/subboeconomica/article/view/2650

Issue

Section

Articles