INSIGHTS ON CONSUMER ONLINE PURCHASE DECISIONS OF WOMEN’S FOOTWEAR

Authors

  • Susana Costa e SILVA Católica Porto Business School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho, 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal, E-mail: ssilva@porto.ucp.pt https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7979-3944
  • Adriana MONTEIRO Católica Porto Business School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho, 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal
  • Paulo DUARTE University of Beira Interior, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8449-5474

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/subboec-2018-0008

Keywords:

Marketing, Online Shopping; Shoes; Women preferences

Abstract

Shoes are probably one of the most difficult products to sell online due to the high need-for-touch (NFT) displayed: people need to experiment the product before buying it, more than in any other item. On another hand, women are more prone than men to buy fashion and apparel products through the web channel. This paper investigates the factors driving women consumers to shop footwear products online. A qualitative research method was used grounded on semi-structured, in-depth interviews that were conducted to corroborate the constructs defined in the proposed conceptual model namely: convenience, recreation, NFT and social e-shopping. The interviews were focused on the demand side to understand the female consumers’ perspective and on the top managers of women’s shoes companies representing the suppliers’ viewpoint. The results show that women highly appreciate the convenience that shopping shoes online provides as well as its recreational nature. The NFT also stands out in the shoe market context mainly due to the particularities related to shoe size. Additionally, social e-shopping was found not be as important for women as anticipated as they see social networks more as a communication platform for brands, and less as a factor that influences their predisposition to shop shoes online. On the suppliers’ side, the interviews revealed that managers believe in bloggers and social media influence and its consideration as part of the overall marketing strategy.

JEL classification: M30, M31, M160;

References

Agardi, I., Dornyei, K. (2011), The influence of internet use and the need for haptic exploration on online purchase activity. Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, 1(2), 1-7.

Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R., Sawyer, A., Wood, S. (1997), Interactive home shopping: consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. The Journal of Marketing, 38-53.

Beauchamp, M. B., Ponder, N. (2010) Perceptions of retail convenience for in-store and online shopper. The Marketing Management Journal, 20(1), 49-65

Bell, D. R., Ho, T. H., Tang, C. S. (1998) Determining where to shop: Fixed and variable costs of shopping. Journal of Marketing Research, 352-369.

Bellman, S., Lohse, G. L., Johnson, E. J. (1999), Predictors of online buying behavior. Communications of the ACM, 42(12), 32-38.

Berry, L. L., Seiders, K., Grewal, D. (2002), Understanding Service Convenience. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 1–17.

Bryman, A., Bell, E. (2015) Business research methods. Oxford University Press, USA.

Boyd, D. M., Ellison, N. B. (2007) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.

Chang, M. K., Cheung, W., Lai, V. S. (2005) Literature derived reference models for the adoption of online shopping. Information and Management, 42(4), 543–559.

Chen, N. H., Hung, Y. W. (2015) Online shopping orientation and purchase behavior for high-touch products. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 6(2), 187–202. Chen, S. J., Chang, T. Z. (2003) A descriptive model of online shopping process: some empirical results. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), 556-569.

Chiang, K. P., Dholakia, R. R. (2003) Factors driving consumer intention to shop online: an empirical investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1), 177-183.

Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., Carson, S. (2001), Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 511–535.

Colwell, S. R., Aung, M., Kanetkar, V., Holden, A. L. (2008), Toward a measure of service convenience: multiple-item scale development and empirical test. Journal of Services Marketing, 22(2), 160-169.

Copeland, M. T. (1923) Relation of consumers’ buying habits to marketing methods. Harvard Business Review, 1(3), 282–289.

DEI Worldwide. (2008), Engaging consumers online - The impact of social media on Purchasing behaviour (volume one: initial findings United States 2008). Retrieved August 23, 2016, from https://themarketingguy.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/dei-study-engaging-consumers-online-summary.pdf

Dennis, C., Morgan, A., Wright, L. T., Jayawardhena, C. (2010), The influences of social e-shopping in enhancing young women’s online shopping behaviour. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 9(2), 151–174.

Dholakia, R., Zhao, M. (2010) Effects of online store attributes on customer satisfaction and repurchase intentions. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 38(7), 482-496.

Dholakia, R. R. (1999), Going shopping: key determinants of shopping behaviors and motivations. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 27(4), 154-165.

Dittmar, H., Long, K., Meek, R. (2004), Buying on the Internet: Gender Differences in On-line and Conventional Buying Motivations. Sex Roles, 50(5-6), 423–444. Donthu, N., Garcia, A. (1999), The internet shopper. Journal of advertising research, 39(3), 52-52.

Ferreira, S. C. and Silva, C. S. (2018), “Um caso de estudo no uso das ferramentas do meio digital”, in Marketeer, nº 258, January, pp. 91-95.

Fiore, A. M., Jin, H. J. (2003). Influence of image interactivity on approach responses towards an online retailer. Internet Research, 13(1), 38-48.

Fiore, A. M., Jin, H. J., Kim, J. (2005) For fun and profit: Hedonic value from image interactivity and responses toward an online store. Psychology and Marketing, 22(8), 669–694.

Gehrke, D., Turban, E. (1999) Determinants of successful website design: relative importance and recommendations for effectiveness. In Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–8.

Girard, T., Korgaonkar, P. Silverblatt, R. (2003) Relationship of type of product, shopping orientations, and demographics with preference for shopping on the Internet. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(1), 101-120.

Grewal, D., Iyer, G. R., Levy, M. (2004) Internet retailing: enablers, limiters and market consequences. Journal of Business Research, 57(7), 703-713.

Hasan, B. (2010) Exploring gender differences in online shopping attitude. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 597–601. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.12.012

Hsu, H. Y., Tsou, H. T. (2011) Understanding customer experiences in online blog environments. International Journal of Information Management, 31(6), 510-523. Huang, P., Lurie, N. H., Mitra, S. (2009) Searching for experience on the web: an empirical examination of consumer behavior for search and experience goods. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 55-69.

Javadi, M. H. M., Dolatabadi, H. R., Nourbakhsh, M., Poursaeedi, A., Asadollahi, A.R. (2012) An analysis of factors affecting on online shopping behavior of consumers. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(5), 81 Jayawardhena, C., Tiu Wright, L. (2009) An empirical investigation into e-shopping excitement: antecedents and effects. European Journal of Marketing, 43(9/10), 1171-1187.

Jensen, J. M. (2012) Shopping orientation and online travel shopping: The role of travel experience. International Journal of Tourism Research, 14(1), 56–70.

Josefinas (2016) Retrieved October 12, 2016, from https://josefinas.com/

Kalakota, R., Whinston, A. B. (1997) Electronic commerce: a manager's guide. Addison-Wesley Professional.

Koufaris, M. (2002) Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online customer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13, 205– 223.

Kulmala, M, Mesiranta, N., Tuominen, P. (2013) Organic and amplified eWOM in consumer fashion blogs. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 17(1), 20-37.

Kwak, H., Fox, R. J., Zinkhan, G. M. (2002) What products can be successfully promoted and sold via the Internet? Journal of advertising research, 42(1), 23-38. Lenhart, A., Madden, M. (2007) Social networking websites and teens: An overview. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.

Lian, J.-W., Yen, D. C. (2014) Online shopping drivers and barriers for older adults: Age and gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 37(August), 133–143. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.028

Liu, C., Arnett, K. P. (2000) Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information & Management, 38(1), 23–33. Lynch, P. D., Kent, R. J., & Srinivasan, S. S. (2001), The global internet shopper: evidence from shopping tasks in twelve countries. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(3), 15-23.

Martineau, P. (1958) The personality of the retail store. Harvard Business Review, 36(1), 47-55.

Mathwick, C. (2002), Understanding the online consumer: a typology of online relational norms and behavior. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16 (1), 40–55.

Miller, D. (1998) Shopping, place, and identity. Psychology Press.

Noori, A. S., Hashim, K. F., Yusof, S. A. M. (2016) The Conceptual Relation of Electronic Word-of-mouth, Commitment and Trust in Influencing Continuous Usage of Social Commerce. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(S7), 226–230.

Peck, J., Childers, T. L. (2003) Individual differences in haptic information processing: The NFT scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 430-442.

Raman, P. (2014) Factors Influencing Women Consumers' Buying Behavior Towards Online Shopping in India. Journal of Contemporary Management Research, 8(2), 23.

Rigby, D. (2011) The future of shopping. Harvard Business Review, 89(12), 65-76. Rodgers, S., & Harris, M. A. (2003), Gender and E-commerce: An exploratory study. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(3), 322–329.

Rodrigues, T., Silva, S., Duarte, P. (2017) The value of textual haptic information in online clothing shopping, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 21 (1).

Seferin, M., Van der Linden, J. (2012) Protection or pleasure: female footwear. Working paper no. 41: 290-294, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.

Social Networks. (2007), Gender and Friending: An Analysis of MySpace Member Profiles. Retrieved August 29, 2016, from http://www.scit.wlv.ac.uk/~cm1993/papers/MySpace_d.doc

Swinyard, W. R., Smith, S. M. (2003) Why people (don't) shop online: A lifestyle study of the internet consumer. Psychology & marketing, 20(7), 567-597.

Tauber, E. M. (1972) Why do people shop. Journal of Marketing, 36, 46- 59. Weathers, D. & Makienko, I. (2006), Assessing the relations between e-tail success and product and web site factors. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 20(2), 41-54. Workman, J.E. (2010), Fashion consumer groups, gender, and NFT. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 28, 126–139.

Zhang, K. Z. K., Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M. K. O. (2014) Examining the moderating effect of inconsistent reviews and its gender differences on consumers’ online shopping decision. International Journal of Information Management, 34(2), 89–98. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.12.001

Zhang, L., Xu, Y., Ye, B., Wang, Q. (2012) Exploring Differences of Consumers’ Perceived Factors in Shopping Online: The Effects of Shopping Experience and Gender. In D. Jin & S. Lin (Eds.), Advances in Electronic Engineering, Communication and Management Vol.1. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol 139 (pp. 639–646). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27287-5_104

Zhou, L., Dai, L., Zhang, D. (2007) Online shopping acceptance model-A critical survey of consumer factors in online shopping. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 8(1), 41.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-30

How to Cite

SILVA, S. C. e, MONTEIRO, A., & DUARTE, P. (2018). INSIGHTS ON CONSUMER ONLINE PURCHASE DECISIONS OF WOMEN’S FOOTWEAR . Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, 63(2), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/subboec-2018-0008

Issue

Section

Articles