UNEVEN EUFICATION, THE SPATIAL FIX AND THE DOMINANCE OF ECONOMIC OVER SOCIAL POLICIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2020-0006

Keywords:

spatial fix, uneven EUfication, capital accumulation, uneven development.

Abstract

I am proposing to use the term EUfication to define the process of creating the EU as territory out of the geographical disparities (re)produced across the core and periphery of Europe. The article contends that EUfication is a manifestation of the phenomenon of spatial fix. In a first step, it describes the dynamics of territorial unevenness within the EU: on the one hand, by some relevant socio-economic cohesion data compiled from Eurostat indicators, and – on the other hand – through the diagnosis on spatial injustice in different Member States, as it was revealed by a comparative research conducted between 2017-2019. Furthermore, my analysis explains territorial unevenness by reconstructing the well-known historical formation of the union through a less acknowledged perspective, i.e., in the context of the changing regimes of capital accumulation. The article concludes that the theory of spatial fix allows us recognizing: the position and timing, from which and when different countries took part in the process of EUfication is a factor leading to the persistence of uneven territorial development among the European core and periphery. My contribution to theorizing on this process consists in bringing together the perspective of the spatial fix with the critical analysis of how is the social dimension paradigm overshadowed by the economic concern of capital accumulation in the socio-economic governance of the European Single Market, including the politics of territorial cohesion.

References

Barca, Fabrizio (2009) An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations, https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/pdf/report_barca_v0306.pdf

Behr, Harmut and Yannis A. Stivachtis, eds., (2016) Revisiting the European Union as Empire, London: Routledge.

Bofinger, Peter (2020) “The ‘frugal four’ should save the European project,” Social Europe, 4th of May 2020, https://www.socialeurope.eu/the-frugal-four-should-save-the-european-project

Böröcz, József and Kovács Mária, eds., (2001) Empires New Clothes. Unveiling EU Enlargement, Central Europe Review.

Branner, Neil and Nik Theodore (2005) “Neoliberalism and the Urban Condition,” City, 9(1):101-107, DOI: 10.1080/13604810500092106.

Brenner, Neil and Nik Theodore, eds., (2002) Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe, Oxford: Blackwell.

Consolidated Version of the European Union Treaty (2012) Official Journal of the European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:2bf140bf-a3f8-4ab2-b506-qfd71826e6da6.0023.02/DOC_1&format=PDF

Davis, Mike (2020) “The Coronavirus Crisis Is a Monster Fueled by Capitalism,” In The Times, https://inthesetimes.com/article/22394/coronavirus-crisis-capitalism-covid-19-monster-mike-davis

European Commission (1999) European Spatial Planning Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union, https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/sum_en.pdf

European Commission (2008) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Committee of the Regions, and the European Social and Economic Committee. Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0616:FIN:EN:PDF

European Commission (2010) Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF

European Commission (2016) Europe in 12 lessons, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a5ba73c6-3c6a-11e8-b5fe-01aa75ed71a1

Harvey, David (1989) “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism,” Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography, Vol. 71, No. 1: 3-17.

Harvey, David (2001) “Globalization and the spatial fix”, Geographische Revue, 2, 23-30, https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/2251/file/ gr2_01_Ess02.pdf

Harvey, David. 2005. Spaces of neoliberalization: towards a theory of uneven geographical development, F.S. Verlag.

Harvey, David (2006) Spaces of Global Capitalism: A Theory of Uneven Geographical Development, London: Verso.

Horn, Gustav, Katharina Dröge, Simon Sturn, Till van Treeck, and Rudolf Zwiener (2009) Von der Finanz- krise zur Weltwirtschaftskrise (III): Die Rolle der Ungleichheit, IMK Report 41, Düsseldorf, Institut für Makroökonomie und Konjunkturforschung.

Jessop, Bob (2001) “Spatial Fixes, Temporal Fixes, and Spatio-Temporal Fixes,” published by the Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, United Kingdom, https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/resources/sociology-online-papers/papers/jessop-spatio-temporal-fixes.pdf

Karamessini, Maria (2019) “Sovereign debt crisis: an opportunity to complete the neoliberal project and dismantle the Greek employment model,” in Steffen Lehndorff (ed): A triumph of failed ideas. European models of capitalism in the crisis, European Trade Union Institute, pp.155-183.

Lang, Tholo and Franziska Görmar, eds., (2019) Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarisation. Re-thinking Spatial Policies in Europe, Palgrave Macmillan.

László, Andor (2020) “Europe 2020”, Progressive Posts, https://progressivepost.eu/spotlights/europe-in-2020

Lehndorff Steffen, ed., (2015) Divisive integration. The triumph of failed ideas in Europe – revisited, European Trade Union Institute.

Leschke, Janine, Sotiria Theodoropoulou and Andrew Watt (2012) “How do economic governance reforms and austerity measures affect inclusive growth as formulated in the Europe 2020 Strategy,” in Steffen Lehndorff (ed.): A triumph of failed ideas. European models of capitalism in the crisis, European Trade Union Institute, pp. 243-283.

Marlier, Eric, David Natali and Rudi van Dam, eds., (2010) Europe 2020. Towards a More Social EU?, P.I.E. Peter Lang, 2010.

Medeiros, Eduard (2016) “Territorial Cohesion: An EU Concept,” European Journal of Spatial Development, No. 60, https://archive.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereed%20articles/refereed60.pdf

Mulder, Jotte (2019) “(Re) Conceptualising a Social Market Economy for the EU Internal Market,” Utrecht Law Review, 15(2): 16–31, DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.508, https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.508/

Pocket, Philippe (2020) “Twenty years of the publication ‘Social policy in the European Union’: what have we learned?”, in Bart Vanhercke, Dalila Ghailani, Slavina Spasova, Philippe Pocket (eds): Social policy in the European Union 1999-2019: the long and winding road, European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), European Social Observatory (OSE), Brussels, pp.13-34.

Roberts, Michael (2020) It was the virus that did it, Michael Roberts Blog, https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2020/03/15/it-was-the-virus-that-did-it

Sabato, Sebastiano and Boris Fronteddu (2020) A socially just transition through the European Green Deal?, Working Paper, European Trade Union Institute.

Schmidt, Ingo (2018) “Neoliberal capitalism and its crises in Europe: towards a Luxemburgian interpretation,” New Formations, 94: 100-120.

Schuman Declaration – 9th of May 1950, https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/symbols/europe-day/schuman-declaration_en

Shore, Cris and Susan Wright, eds., (1997) Anthropology of Policy: critical perspectives on governance and power, Routledge.

Shore, Cris, Susan Wright and Davide Pero, eds., (2011) Policy worlds. Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power, Berghahn.

Smith, Neil (1984) Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space, Blackwell.

The Territorial State and Perspectives in the European Union. 2011 update. Background document for the Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020, https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/policy/what/territorial-cohesion/territorial_state_and_perspective_2011.pdf

The Treaty of Lisbon, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/5/the-treaty-of-lisbon

Tricot, Jean-Paul (2020) “Once upon a time there was the European social dialogue”, in Bart Vanhercke, Dalila Ghailani, Slavina Spasova, Philippe Pochet (eds.): Social policy in the European Union 1999-2019: the long and winding road, European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), European Social Observatory (OSE), Brussels, pp.71-99.

Troost A. And Hersel P. (2012) Die Euro-Krise als Zäsur: Eine neue Finanz-, Geld-, und Wirtschaftspolitik in Europa, Luxemburg, Gesellschaftsanalyse und linke Praxis, http://www.zeitschrift-luxemburg.de/?p=2082

Vanhercke, Bart, Slavina Spasova, Dalila Ghailani and Philippe Pochet (2020) “Preface”, and “Conclusions: the twists and turns of two decades of EU social policymaking”, in Bart Vanhercke, Dalila Ghailani, Slavina Spasova, Philippe Pochet (eds.): Social policy in the European Union 1999-2019: the long and winding road, European Trade Union Institute and European Social Observatory, Brussels, pp. 9-13, and pp. 183-203.

Vanhercke, Bert, Dalila Ghailani, Slavina Spasova and Philippe Pochet, eds., (2020) Social policy in the European Union 1999-2019: the long and winding road, European Trade Union Institute and European Social Observatory, Brussels.

Vincze, Enikő (2015) “Glocalization of neoliberalism in Romania. Through the reform of the state and entrepreneurial development,” Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Europaea, Volume 60: Issue 1: 125-152.

Vincze, Enikő (2019) “Three decades after. Advancing capitalism and the (re)production of Romania’s semi-peripherality,” Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia, Volume 64: Issue 2: 141-164, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2019-0013.

Zielonka, Jan (2006) Europe as Empire. The Nature of the Enlarged European Union, Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-28

How to Cite

VINCZE, E. (2022). UNEVEN EUFICATION, THE SPATIAL FIX AND THE DOMINANCE OF ECONOMIC OVER SOCIAL POLICIES. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Sociologia, 65(2), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2020-0006

Issue

Section

Articles