CRISIS OF LANGUAGE: SEMANTICS IN GOD-DISCUSSION OF THE FATHERS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbto.2022.1.04

Keywords:

Culture, linguistic, logos, patristic, Trinity

Abstract

The early Christian discussion on the doctrine of God occurred primarily within the Hellenistic culture. Christians borrowed both concepts and religious and philosophical vocabularies from the existing culture to appropriate their faith. These concepts and vocabularies have inherent meanings associated with them. Thus, a Hellenization of Christianity has been argued for in the existing literature. On the other hand, baptizing them into Christian usage also resulted in a dehellenization of the cultural concepts and vocabularies. This essay focuses on the linguistic aspect of the interaction of Christianity with culture during its early years. It argues that Patristic discussion on God and Godhead needs to be understood within the dynamics of the crisis of language and the semantic differences that accompanied patristic appropriation of the Christian faith.

References

Abhishiktananda, Swami. Saccidananda: A Christain Approach to Advaitic Experience. New Delhi: ISPCK, 1974.

Beatrice, Franco. “The Word ‘Homoousios’ from Hellenism to Christianity” Church History, vol. 71, No. 2 (June 2002). 243-72.

Boyd, Robin. Introduction to Indian Christain Theology. Madrasi: CLS, 1975.

Burke, Peter and Roy Porter (eds). The Social History of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Brummer, Vincent. Atonement Christology and Trinity: Making Sense of Christian Doctrine. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 2005.

Copleston, Frederick. A History of Philosophy, Vol. 1. London/NY: Continuum, 2003.

Coppedge, Allan. The God Who is Triune: Revisioning the Christian Doctrine of God. Downers Grove, Illinois: IVP Academic, 2007.

Danielou, Jean. “The philosophy of Philo” Theological Studies, IX (Dec. 1948). 578-89.

Dillon, J. “Logos and trinity: Patterns of Platonist influence on early Christianity.” In

G. Vesey (ed.), The philosophy in Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Gaston, Thomas E. “The influence of Platonism on the early Apologists.” The Heythrop Journal (July 2009). 573-80.

Gwynn, David M. Athanasius of Alexandria: Bishop, Theologian, Ascetic, Father. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Irenaeus. On the Apostolic Preaching, trans., John Behr. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1997.

Johnson, Keith E. Rethinking the Trinity and Religion Pluralism: An Augustinian Assessment. Downers Grove, Illinois: IVP Academic, 2011.

Karamanolis, George. “Early Christian Philosophers on Aristotle.” In Andrea Falcon (ed.). Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, (Leiden/ Boston: Brill, 216), 475.

Lashier, Jackson. “Irenaeus as Logos Theologian” Vigiliae Christianae, vol. 66, No. 4 (2012). 341-61.

Lingua, Graziano. “Trinity, Number and Image. The Christian Origins of the Concept of Person” https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-021-09835-9

Lobo Bryan. “Tripersonalising the Hindu God of ‘Advaita Vedanta – Parabrahman” Gregorianum, Vol. 92, No. 1 (2011). 159-182.

Long, A.A. “Stoic Psychology.” In The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, eds, Keimpe Algra et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 2005. 560-584.

Lyons, John. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.

Marsh, Thomas. The Triune God: A Biblical, Historical and Theological Study. Mystic, CT: Twenty-Third Publications, 1994.

May, Peter. “The Trinity and Saccidananda” https://biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/ijt/07-3_093.pdf.

Mohrmann, Christine. “Linguistic Problems in the Early Christian Church.” Vigiliae Christianae, vol. 11, No. 1 (March 1957). 11-36.

Origen. On First Principles, trans., GW Butterworth. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf & Stock, 1936.

Osborn, Eric. Tertullian: First Theologian of the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Partee, Barbara H. “Semantics.” In The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, eds Robert A Wilson and Frank C Keil. London: The MIT Press, 1999. 739-41.

Pelikan, Jaroslav. The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine, Vol. 1, The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition (100-600). Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, 1971.

Perkins, Pheme. “Logo Christologies in the Nag Hammadi Codices” Vigiliae Christianae, vol. 35, No. 4 (Dec. 1981). 379-96.

Popma, K.J. “Patristic Evaluation of Culture” Philosophia Reformata, vol. 38, No. 1 (1973). 97-113.

Santrac, Aleksandar S. “Three I know not what: The influence of Greek philosophy on the doctrine of Trinity.” In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi 47(1) (2013). 1-7.

Schwobel, Christoph. “The trinity between Athens and Jerusalem” Journal of Reformed Theology 3(1) (2009). 22-41.

St Pamphilus. “Apology for Origen” Fathers of the Church tran. Thomas P Scheck. Washington, D.C: The Catholic University of America Press, 2010.

Sumithra, Sunand. Christian Theologies from an Indian Perspective. Bangalore: Theological Book Trust, 1990.

Trench, Richard Chenevix. Synonyms of the New Testament. London-Cambridge: Macmillan, 1865.

Tuggy, Dale. “Trinity”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/trinity/

Upadhyah, Brahmabandhab. “I bow to Saccidananda.” In Julius Lipner and George Gispert-Sauch. The Writings of Brahmabandhab Upadhyah, Vol. 1. Bangalore: United Theological College, 1991.

Von Harnack, Adolf. 1902. What is Christianity? Lectures delivered in the University of Berlin during the Winter-term, 1899–1900, trans. by Th.B. Saunders. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons - London: Williams and Norgate, 214-221.

Wolfson, Harry Austryn. The Philosophy of the Church Fathers, Vol. I: Faith, Trinity, Incarnation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1956.

Wolfson, H.A. “Clement of Alexandria on the Generation of the logos” Church History, Vol. 20, No. 2 (June 1951). 72-81.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

JAMIR, C. (2022). CRISIS OF LANGUAGE: SEMANTICS IN GOD-DISCUSSION OF THE FATHERS. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Theologia Orthodoxa, 67(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbto.2022.1.04

Issue

Section

Articles