AU CŒUR DE L'INTERDISCIPLINARITE : LA THEORIE DU DISCOURS APPLIQUEE EN SCIENCE POLITIQUE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2018.2.09Keywords:
interdisciplinarity, discourse theory, political science, researchAbstract
At the Heart of Interdisciplinarity: the Discourse Theory Applied to Political Science. The purpose of this presentation is to highlight the interdisciplinary character of the third generation of discourse theory, as well as its capacity to open new perspectives in the study of political phenomena. To this end, we will first theoretically reference the stakes of interdisciplinarity in connection with the emergence of discourse theory as a forward-looking approach in the humanities and social sciences. Secondly, we will look into the five premises of discourse theory, which will be assessed as intellectual products of an essentially interdisciplinary process which consists of bringing together and mutualizing research strategies which belong to various scientific fields (sociology, linguistics, anthropology, philosophy, political science, psychoanalysis). Thirdly, we will explore the merits and limits of the use of discourse theory as a theoretical framework and an explanatory tool in the analysis of political phenomena.
References
Almond, Gabriel (1956), « Comparative Political Systems », The Journal of Politics, vol. 18, no. 3, 391-409.
Balandier, Georges (1996), Une anthropologie des moments critiques, Paris : EHESS.
Cardoso Rosas, João, Ferreira, Ana Rita (2013), "Left and Right: Critical Junctures" in Cardoso Rosas, João, Ferreira, Ana Rita (dir.), Left and Right: The Great Dichotomy Revisited, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2-20.
Darbellay, Frédéric (2006), Interdisciplinarité et transdisciplinarité en analyse des discours. Complexité des textes, intertextualité et transtextualité, Genève : Editions Slatkine.
Darbellay, Frédéric (dir.) (2012), La circulation des savoirs. Interdisciplinarité, concepts nomades, analogies, métaphores, Berne : Editions scientifiques internationales.
Demesmay, Claire, Glaab, Manuela (dir.) (2009), L’avenir des partis politiques en France et en Allemagne, Villeneuve d’Ascq : Presses Universitaires du Septentrio.
Dieu François (2008), Introduction à la méthode de la science politique, Paris : L'Harmattan.
Fairclough, Norman (1995), Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language, Londres : Longman Publishing.
Durkheim, Emile (1897), Le Suicide : étude de sociologie, Paris : Félix Alcan.
Foucault, Michel (2004), « Anthropologie et langage », Philosophie : anthologie, Paris : Gallimard.
Freund, Julien (1983), Sociologie du conflit, Paris: PUF, 1983.
Gaus, Gerald F., Chandran, Kukathas (dir.) (2004), Handbook of Political Theory, Londres: Sage.
Giddens, Anthony (1984), The constitution of society : Outline of the theory of structuration, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Groupe de Montheron (1996), Les cigales et les fourmis. Des emprunts entre sciences, Le Mont-sur-Lausanne : LEP.
Howarth, David, Törfing, Jacob. (dir.) (2005), Discourse Theory in European Politics. Identity, Policy and Governance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Karnoven, Lauri, Kuhnle, Stein. (dir.) (2001), Party Systems and Voter Alignments Revisited, New York, Routledge.
Kasza, Gregory (2000), “‘Technicism’ Supplanting Disciplinarity among Political Scientists”, PS: Political Science & Politics, 33.
Laclau, Ernesto, Mouffe, Chantal (1985), "Hegemony: The Genealogy of a Concept" in Hegemony and the Socialist Strategy, Londres: Verso.
Laclau, Ernesto (2005), La raison populiste, Paris : Seuil.
Laclau, Ernesto (2014), The Rhetorical Foundations of Society, Londres: Verso.
Le Digol, Christophe (2012), « Comment penser le clivage gauche-droite » in Gauche-droite. Génèse d'un clivage politique, Paris : Presses Universitaires de France, 1-17.
Lipset, Seymour Martin, Rokkan, Stein (dir.) (1967), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, New York: The Free Press, 1-9.
Mann, Michael (1986), The Sources of Social Power: Volume 1, A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mead, George Herbert (1934), Mind, Self, and Society, Chicago: University Press.
Mouffe, Chantal (2000), The Democratic Paradox, Londres: Verso.
Mouffe, Chantal (2005), On the Political, Abingdon: Routledge.
Newman, Saul (2001), From Bakunin to Lacan. Anti-authoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power, Lanha: Lexington Books.
Origgi, Gloria, Darbellay, Frédéric (dir.) (2010), Repenser l'interdisciplinarité, Genève: Editions Slatkine.
Phelan, Sean, Dahlberg, Lincoln (2011), "Discourse Theory and Critical Media Politics: An Introduction" in Dahlberg, Lincoln, Phelan, Sean (dir.) Discourse Theory and Critical Media Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Seiler, Daniel-Louis (2001), « L’actualité de l’approche des partis en termes de clivages socio-politiques » in Andolfatto, Dominique, Greffet, Fabienne et Olivier, Laurent (dir.), Les partis politiques : Quelles perspectives ? Paris : L’Harmattan, 49-70.
Schmitt, Carl (1972), La notion du politique - Théorie du partisan, Paris: Calmann-Lévy.
Sfez, Lucien (dir.) (2002), Science politique et interdisciplinarité. Conférences (1998-2000), Paris : Publications de la Sorbonne.
Tilly, Charles (dir.) (1975), The Formation of the National States in Western Europe, Princeton: University Press.
Verhaeghe, Paul (1996), « The Riddle of Castration Anxiety: Lacan beyond Freud », The Letter. Lancanian Perspectives on Psychoanalysis, n°6.
Weiss, Gilbert, Wodak, Ruth (dir.) (2003), Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity, Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, Ruth, Meyer, Michael (dir.) (2011), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, Londres: Sage.
Žižek, Slavoj (1996), « Invisible Ideology : Political Violence Between Fiction and Fantasy » in Journal of Political Ideologies, Vol. 1, Issue 1.
Žižek, Slavoj (2002), For they know not what they do: Enjoyment as a political factor, Londres, New York: Verso (2e édition).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Europaea
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
