RETHINKING KNOWLEDGE-THAT AND KNOWLEDGE-HOW: PERFORMANCE, INFORMATION AND FEEDBACK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2020.3.04Keywords:
knowledge-how, knowledge-that, information, performance, feedbackAbstract
This work approaches the distinction between knowledge-how and knowledge-that in terms of two complementary concepts: performance and information. In order to do so, I formulate Ryle’s argument of infinite regress in terms of performance in order to show that Stanley and Williamson’s counterargument has no real object: both reject the view that the exercise of knowledge-that necessarily requires the previous consideration of propositions. Next, using the concept of feedback, I argue that Stanley and Williamson’s positive account of knowledge-how in terms of knowledge-that corresponds to the output of the comparison between an intention of action and the perceived outcome of performance. Then, I expound other theories of mind and cognition in which feedback and prediction play a fundamental role in order to explain other ways in which information intervenes in performance—i.e., information is construed as knowledge-that available at subject level that guides performance. Finally, I present some reflections on the impact of the concept of knowledge-how, and possible routes to continue our enquiry on the nature of knowledge.
References
Altmann, Wolfgang, Practical process control for engineers and technicians, Elsevier, 2005.
Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne, Daniel M. Wolpert, and Christopher D. Frith. “Abnormalities in the awareness of action”, Trends in cognitive sciences 6.6 / 2002, pp. 237-242.
Borges, Rodrigo, “Introduction to the special issue ‘knowledge and justification: new perspectives’”, Synthese / 2020, pp. 1-8.
Brandt, Per Aage. “What is cognitive semiotics? A new paradigm in the study of meaning”, Signata. Annales des sémiotiques/Annals of Semiotics 2 / 2011, pp. 49-60.
Bubic, Andreja, D. Yves Von Cramon, and Ricarda I. Schubotz, “Prediction, cognition and the brain”, Frontiers in human neuroscience 4 / 2010, p. 25.
Clark, Andy, Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind, Oxford University Press, 2015.
Clark, Andy, “2014: What Scientific Idea is Ready for Retirement?”, Edge, https://www.edge.org/response-detail/25394. Accessed December 8, 2020.
Dewey, John, “The reflex arc concept in psychology”, Psychological review 3.4 / 1896, p. 357.
Farkas, Kataline, ‟Know-how and non-propositional intentionality”, in M. Montague, A. Grzankowski (eds.), Non-propositional intentionality, Oxford University Press, 2018, 95-113.
Frankfurt, Harry G. “The problem of action”, in American philosophical quarterly 15.2 /1978, pp. 157-162
Friston, Karl, “The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?”, Nature reviews neuroscience 11.2 / 2010, pp. 127-138.
Gallagher, Helen L., and Christopher D. Frith. “Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’”, Trends in cognitive sciences 7.2 / 2003, pp. 77-83.
Gascoigne, N. and Thornton, T., “Knowing how and knowing that”, in Tacit knowledge, Acumen, 2013, pp. 51–79.
Gettier, Edmund L., “Is justified true belief knowledge?”, Analysis 23.6 / 1963, pp. 121-123.
Greimas, Argirdas Julien. “Reflexiones acerca de los modelos actanciales”, in Semántica estructural: investigación metodológica, 1987, pp. 263-293.
Greimas, Alrgirdas Julien. On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory, Translated by Paul J. Perron, University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
Grosfoguel, Ramón, “The epistemic decolonial turn: Beyond political-economy paradigms”, Cultural studies 21.2-3 / 2007, pp. 211-223.
Haggard, Patrick. “Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will”, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9.12 / 2008, pp. 934-946.
Haykin, Simon, Adaptive filter theory, Fifth Edition, Pearson Education, 2014.
Huba, Mary E., and Jann E. Freed. Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Allyn & Bacon, 2000.
Jeannerod, Marc. Motor cognition: What actions tell the self. No. 42. Oxford University Press, 2006.
Kaptelinin, Victor, “Affordances”, in The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, Interaction Design Foundation, 2014, ch. 44.
Linson, Adam, et al., “The active inference approach to ecological perception: general information dynamics for natural and artificial embodied cognition”, Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5 / 2018, p. 21.
Paolucci, Claudio. “Social cognition, mindreading and narratives. A cognitive semiotics perspective on narrative practices from early mindreading to Autism Spectrum Disorder”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18.2 / 2019, pp. 375-400.
Parviainen, J. “Bodily knowledge: Epistemological reflections on dance”. Dance Research Journal 34(1)/2002, pp. 11–26.
Poston, Ted. “Know how to be Gettiered?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79.3 / 2009, pp. 743-747.
Martin, Bronwen and Felizitas Ringham, Dictionary of semiotics, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2000.
Miranda Medina, Juan Felipe, “Competence, Counterpoint and Harmony: A triad of semiotic concepts for the scholarly study of dance”, Signata. Annales des sémiotiques/Annals of Semiotics 11 / 2020.
Pezzulo, Giovanni, and Paul Cisek, “Navigating the affordance landscape: feedback control as a process model of behavior and cognition”, in Trends in cognitive sciences, 20.6 /2016, pp. 414-424.
Powers, William Treval, and William T. Powers. Behavior: The control of perception, Aldine, 1973.
Ryle, Gilbert, “Knowing how and knowing that: The presidential address”, in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol. 46 / 1945, Oxford University Press, pp. 1-16.
Ryle, Gilbert, “Knowing how and knowing that”, in The concept of mind, Hutchinson University Library, 1949, pp. 26–60.
Sattler, Jerome M., Assessment of children (3rd ed.), Jerome M. Sattler, 1988.
Schleifer, Ronald, and Alan Velie. “Genre and Structure: Toward an Actantial Typology of Narrative Genres and Modes.” MLN 102.5 / 1987, pp. 1122-1150.
Stanley, J., Know How, Oxford University Press, 2011.
Stanley, Jason, and John W. Krakauer. “Motor skill depends on knowledge of facts”, in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7 /2013), pp. 1-11.
Stanley, Jason and Williamson, Timothy, “Knowing how”, The Journal of Philosophy 98(8) / 2001, pp. 411–444.
Stanley, Jason and Williamson, Timothy, “Skill”, NOUS 51:4 / 2017, pp. 713–726.
Steup, Matthias and Ram Neta, “Epistemology”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/epistemology/
Wiener, Norbert. Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. MIT press, 2019. Original publication 1948.
Wiese, Wanja and Thomas Metzinger, “Vanilla PP for Philosophers: A Primer on Predictive Processing”, in T. Metzinger & W. Wiese (Eds.). Philosophy and Predictive Processing: 1. MIND Group, 2017.
Williams, James, Process philosophy of signs, Edinburgh University Press, 2016.
Wu, Wayne, “Shaking up the mind’s ground floor: the cognitive penetration of visual attention”, in The Journal of Philosophy, 114.1 / 2017, pp. 5-32.
Yale University, Department of Philosophy, Know how, https://philosophy.yale.edu/publications/know-how . Accessed December 8, 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
