SCHLICK AND SELLARS ON OBSERVATIONAL KNOWLEDGE

Authors

  • Anton CRIȘAN Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: crisananton@yahoo.com.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2020.3.09

Keywords:

Schlick, Sellars, confirmations, the Given, observation reports

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to provide a comparative account of the manner in which Moritz Schlick and Wilfrid Sellars treat certain aspects surrounding the topic of observational knowledge. By considering Sellars’s allusions to Schlick’s epistemological undertaking within the context of his rejection of givenness, I evaluate the extent to which Schlick can be characterized as a traditional foundationalist. By emphasizing that this is not the case and that Schlick adheres to a non-standard version of epistemological foundationalism, I shed some light on those theoretical elements that allow for a convergence of opinions between the two authors to transpire.

References

deVries, Willem & Timm Triplett. 2000. Knowledge, Mind and the Given: Reading Wilfrid Sellars’s ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind’. Indianapolis and Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing Co.

deVries, Willem. 2005. Wilfrid Sellars. Chesham: Acumen Publishing Limited.

Maher, Chauncey. 2012. The Pittsburgh School: Sellars, McDowell, Brandom, New York and London: Routledge.

Oberdan, Thomas. 1993. Protocols, Truth and Convention, Amsterdam and Atlanta GA: Editions Rodopi.

O’Shea, James. 2007. Wilfrid Sellars: Naturalism with a Normative Turn. Cambridge & Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Schlick, Moritz, 1959. The Foundation of Knowledge. A.J. Ayer (ed.), Logical Positivism, New York: The Free Press, p. 209-227.

Sellars, Wilfrid. 2000. Empiricism and The Philosophy of Mind. Willem deVries & Timm Triplett, Knowledge, Mind and the Given: Reading Wilfrid. Sellars’s ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind’. Indianapolis and Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing Co, p. 205-276.

Uebel, Thomas. 1996. “Anti-foundationalism and the Vienna Circle’s Revolution in Philosophy”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 47, 415-440.

Uebel, Thomas. 2007. Empiricism at the Crossroads. The Vienna Circle’s Protocol-Sentence Debate, Chicago and LaSalle: Open Court Publishing Company.

Williams, Michael. 2009. The Tortoise and the Serpent: Sellars on the Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Willem de Vries (ed.), Empiricism, Perceptual Knowledge, Normativity, and Realism, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, p. 147-186.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-20

How to Cite

CRIȘAN, A. . (2020). SCHLICK AND SELLARS ON OBSERVATIONAL KNOWLEDGE. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia, 65(3), 163 –. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2020.3.09

Issue

Section

Articles