REALISM/ANTIREALISM DEBATE: A SELECTION OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ARGUMENTS OF THE DEBATE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2020.spiss.08Keywords:
realism, antirealism, debate, arguments, Dummett, PutnamAbstract
Realism/Antirealism Debate: A Selection of the Most Important Arguments of the Debate. The present article intends to explore features of the realism/antirealism dispute. The intention is to offer arguments in favor of both sides for a better understanding of the debate. The article wants to use both logical arguments and sociological or psychological ones.
References
Aliseda, Atocha. Abductive reasoning, vol. 330. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006.
Atkinson, Rita L., et al. Introducere în psihologie, Editura Tehnică, 2002.
Boolos, George, Meaning and method: essays in honor of Hilary Putnam, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Boyd, Richard, Realism, conventionality, and realism about. 1990.
Carrier, Martin. “What is wrong with the miracle argument?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 22.1 (1991).
Chakravartty, Anjan, A metaphysics for scientific realism: Knowing the unobservable, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Devitt, Michael. “Dummett’s anti-realism” The Journal of Philosophy, 80.2 (1983): 73-99.
Devitt, Michael, și Kim Sterelny, (trad. Radu Dudău), Limbaj şi realitate. O introducere în filosofia limbajului. Editura Polirom, Iaşi (2000).
Dummett, Michael, Realism din Truth and other enigmas. Harvard University Press, 1978.
Dummett, Michael, The reality of the past din Truth and other enigmas. Harvard University Press, 1978.
Dummett, Michael, Realism din The Seas of Language, (1993): 230-276.
Gödel, Kurt, “Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I.”, Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38.1 (1931): 173-198.
Haggbloom, Steven J., et al. “The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century”, Review of General Psychology, 6.2 (2002): 139-152.
Keller, Evelyn Fox, “Feminism and science”, Signs: Journal of women in culture and society 7.3 (1982): 589-602.
Kleene, Stephen Cole, et al., Introduction to metamathematics. Vol. 483. New York:
van Nostrand, 1952.
Kuhn, Thomas S., (trad. Radu J. Bogdan), Structura revoluțiilor științifice. Humanitas, 1999.
Laudan, Larry, “A confutation of convergent realism”, Philosophy of Science 48.1 (1981): 19-49.
Laudan, Larry, “Realism without the real”, Philosophy of Science 51.1 (1984): 156-162.
McGuinness, B. F. și Oliveri G., eds. The Philosophy of Michael Dummett. Vol. 239. Springer Science & Business Media, 1994.
Miclea, Mircea, Psihologie cognitivă: modele teoretico-experimentale. Ed. Polirom, 1999.
Naibo, Alberto, “Putnam-Dummett. Quelle logique pour quel réalisme?” Archives de Philosophie, vol. tome 79, no. 4, 2016, pp. 693-720.
Poincaré, Henri (trad. Constantin Popescu-Ulmu), Ştiinţă şi ipoteză, Editura ştiinţifică
şi enciclopedică, 1986.
Popa, Marian, Statistică pentru psihologie: teorie şi aplicaţii SPSS. Polirom, 2008.
Prawitz, Dag. “Meaning theory and anti-realism”, The Philosophy of Michael Dummett, Springer, Dordrecht, 1994. 79-89.
Putnam, Hilary, What is mathematical truth? din Mathematics, Matter and Method: Volume 1, Philosophical Papers. CUP Archive, 1975.
Putnam, Hilary, Three valued logic din Mathematics, Matter and Method: Volume 1, Philosophical Papers. CUP Archive, 1975.
Putnam, Hilary, “Realism and reason” Meaning and the moral sciences, (1978): 123-140.
Quine, Willard V., Methods of logic. Harvard University Press, 1950.
M. Schlick, Formă şi conținut. O introducere în gândirea filosofică, Editura Pelican, Giurgiu, 2003.
Sperber, Dan, și Deirdre Wilson, “Irony and the use-mention distinction” Philosophy 3, (1981): 143-184.
Sperber, Dan, et al. "Epistemic vigilance." Mind & Language 25.4 (2010): 359-393.
Wang, Hao (trad. S. Vieru și U. Morgenstern), Studii de logică matematică. Editura Ştiinţifică, 1972.
Weiss, Bernhard, Michael Dummett, Routledge, 2014.
Wright, Crispin, Saving the differences: essays on themes from truth and objectivity. Harvard University Press, 2003.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
