PHENOMENOLOGY, DECONSTRUCTION, AND CRITIQUE: A DERRIDEAN PERSPECTIVE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2021.1.02

Keywords:

Critical theory, Derrida, Gödel, Kant, politics, post-phenomenology, undecidability.

Abstract

Critical phenomenology is gaining currency as a progressive philosophy of emancipation, but there is no consensus on what its “criticality” entails. From a Derridean perspective, critique can be said to involve radical self-interrogation; a philosophy that questions its own conditions of possibility or grounds is one that opens itself to its auto-deconstruction. Deconstruction produces undecidability, however, which means that the philosophy in question can no longer account for its political claims or its normative force. This is the predicament in which critical phenomenology, like any other critical theory, will find itself when it takes its critical injunction to heart.

References

Capocho, João Pedro, “Disagreeing before Acting: The Paradoxes of Critique and Politics from Adorno to Rancière,” Theoria and Praxis 1(1), 2013, 64-77.

Davis, Duane, “The Phenomenological Method,” in Gail Weiss, Ann Murphy, and Gayle Salamon (eds.), 50 Concepts for a Critical Phenomenology, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2020, 3-9.

Derrida, Jacques, “Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority,’” in Drucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld and David Gray Carlson (eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, New York and London: Routledge, 1992, 3–67.

Derrida, Jacques, “Ja, or the Faux-Bond II,” in Points...: Interviews, 1974-1994, transl. Peggy Kamuf, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985, 30-77.

Derrida, Jacques, “Letter to a Japanese Friend,” in David Wood and Robert Bernasconi (eds.), Derrida and Différance, Evanston, IL.: Northwestern University Press, 1988, 1-5.

Derrida, Jacques, “Ousia and Grammē: Note on a Note from Being and Time,” in Margins of Philosophy, transl. Alan Bass, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982, 29-67.

Derrida, Jacques, “The Politics of Friendship,” transl. Gabriel Motzkin, The Journal of Philosophy 85(11), 1988, 632–644.

Derrida, Jacques, “The Principle of Reason: The University in the Eyes of Its Pupils,” transl. Catherine Porter and Edward P. Morris, diacritics 13(3), 1983, 3-21.

Derrida, Jacques, “Violence and Metaphysics: An Essay on the Thought of Emmanuel Levinas,” in Writing and Difference, transl. Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.

Derrida, Jacques, Voice and Phenomenon: Introduction to the Problem of the Sign in Husserl’s Phenomenology, transl. Leonard Lawlor, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2011.

Ferrari, Martina, et al., “Editors’ Introduction: Reflections on the First Issue,” Puncta: Journal of Critical Phenomenology, 1(1), 2018, 1-7.

Fraser, Nancy, “What’s Critical about Critical Theory? The Case of Habermas and Gender,” New German Critique, 35, 1985, 97-131.

Gaon, Stella, “Pluralizing Universal ‘Man’: The Legacy of Transcendentalism and Teleology in Habermas’s Discourse Ethics,” The Review of Politics 60(4), 1998, 685-718.

Gaon, Stella, The Lucid Vigil: Deconstruction, Desire and the Politics of Critique, New York and London: Routledge, 2019.

Guenther, Lisa, “Critical Phenomenology,” in Gail Weiss, Ann Murphy, and Gayle Salamon (eds.), 50 Concepts for a Critical Phenomenology, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2020, 11-16.

Guenther, Lisa, Solitary Confinement: Social Death and Its Afterlives, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.

Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Practical Reason, third edition, transl. Lewis White Beck, New York: MacMillan Publishing Company, 1993.

Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, transl. Norman Kemp Smith, London: MacMillan, 1929.

Marder, Michael, Phenomena–Critique–Logos: The Project of Critical Phenomenology, London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014.

McMahon, Laura, “Religion, Multiculturalism, and Phenomenology as a Critical Practice: Lessons from the Algerian War of Independence,” Puncta: Journal of Critical Phenomenology, 3(1), 2020, 1-26.

Oksala, Johanna, “Reply to Beata Stawarska,” Puncta: Journal of Critical Phenomenology, 2(1), 2019, 42-45.

Nagel, Ernest, and Newman, James R., Gödel’s Proof, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1959.

Salamon, Gayle, “What’s Critical about Critical Phenomenology?” Puncta: Journal of Critical Phenomenology, 1(1), 2018, 8-17.

Stawarska, Beata, “Book Review Article, Feminist Experiences: Foucauldian and Phenomenological Investigations by Johanna Oksala,” Puncta: Journal of Critical Phenomenology, 2(1), 2019, 33-41.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

GAON, S. (2021). PHENOMENOLOGY, DECONSTRUCTION, AND CRITIQUE: A DERRIDEAN PERSPECTIVE. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia, 66(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2021.1.02

Issue

Section

Articles