THE FORMALITY OF PETER OF SPAIN’S THEORY OF SUPPOSITION

Authors

  • Vlad-Lucian ILE Center of Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Centre d’études supérieures de la Renaissance, Université de Tours, France. Email: vladile@yahoo.com. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7063-7256

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2018.3.01

Keywords:

Peter of Spain, supposition theory, medieval logic, property of terms, quantification, form, formalization, William Ockham

Abstract

Relatively recent literature on supposition theory seems to use different modern logical tools of interpretation that can be generally described as formalizations. Since the act of formalizing may be understood as a process of changing its object in the sense of making it more formal, an assessment of this kind of approaches is necessary. Accordingly, our main goal in this paper is to analyze the formality of Peter of Spain’s theory of supposition and to evaluate its interpretation as a quantification theory. Our main thesis is that although Peter’s theory presents certain weak notions of formality, the formality presupposed by the quantificational interpretation is nowhere to be found in his considerations.

References

Ashworth, E. J., “Priority of analysis and merely confused supposition” in Franciscan Studies, Vol. 33 (1973), pp. 38-41;

Bocheński, Józef Maria, A History of Formal Logic, Notre Dame Press, 1961;

Boehner, Philotheus, Medieval Logic: An Outline of Its Development from 1250 to 1400, University of Chicago Press, 1952;

Corcoran, John; Swiniarski, John, “Logical Structures of Ockham's Theory of Supposition” in Franciscan Studies, Volume 38, 1978, pp. 161-183;

Dutilh, Catarina Novaes “The Different Ways in which Logic is (said to be) formal” in History and Philosophy of Logic, 32:4, 2011, pp. 303-332.

Dutilh, Catarina Novaes, Formalizing medieval logical theories, Springer, 2007.

MacFarlane, John Gordon, What does it mean to say that logic is formal?, Phd thesis, 2000.

Matthews, Gareth B., “A note on Ockham’s theory of the modes of common personal supposition” in Franciscan Studies, Vol. 44, William of Ockham (1285-1347) Commemorative Issue, Part I (1984), pp. 81-86;

Matthews, Gareth B., “Ockham's Supposition Theory and Modern Logic” in The Philosophical Review, Vol. 73, No. 1 (Jan., 1964), pp. 91-99.

Matthews, Gareth B., “Supposition and Quantification in Ockham” in Noûs, Vol. 7, No. 1 (Mar., 1973), pp. 13-24;

Perreiah, Alan R., “Approaches to supposition theory” in The New Scholasticism, vol. XLV, nr. 3, 1971, pp. 381-408.

Perreiah, Alan R., “Supposition theory: A new approach” in The New Scholasticism, vol. LX, nr. 2, 1986, pp. 213-231.

Peter of Spain, Summaries of logic, text, translation, introduction and notes by B. P. Copenhaver with C. Normore and T. Parsons, Oxford University Press, 2014

Priest, Graham; Read, Stephen “The Formalization of Ockham's Theory of Supposition” in Mind, New Series, Vol. 86, No. 341 (Jan., 1977), pp. 109-113;

Spade, Paul Vincent, “Priority of Analysis and the Predicates of O-form Sentences” in Franciscan Studies, Volume 36, 1976, pp. 263-270.

Swiniarski, John J., “A New Presentation of Ockham's Theory of Supposition with an Evaluation of some Contemporary Criticisms” in Franciscan Studies, Volume 30, 1970, pp. 181-217;

William Ockham, Opera Philosophica I - Summa Logicae, St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: Editiones Instituti Franciscani Universitatis S. Bonaventurae, 1974, eds Boehner, Philotheus, Gál, Gedeon, 1915- Brown, Stephen, on www.logicmuseum.com.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-20

How to Cite

ILE, V.-L. . (2018). THE FORMALITY OF PETER OF SPAIN’S THEORY OF SUPPOSITION. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia, 63(3), 11 –. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2018.3.01

Issue

Section

Articles