‟LE RITE” (1969) D’INGMAR BERGMAN: L’ACTEUR-COMME-ACTEUR ENTRE L’‟ANAGNORISIS” ET LA FRAGILITÉ DE L’IDENTIFICATION

Authors

  • Alexandra Noemina CÂMPEAN Doctor of Letters, Faculty of Letters, Babeș-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca; member of the Romanian Forum of the Lacanian Field. Email: noemina.campean@gmail.com.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2017.1.07

Keywords:

repetition, ritual, anagnorisis, identity, sufferance

Abstract

Ingmar Bergman’s The Rite (1969): the Actor-as-Actor between Anagnorisis and Fragility of Identification. The present paper analyses the strange identification experienced by the Bergmanian actor-as-actor, due to a perpetual memory of the body. We will examine the manner in which the actor who plays the role of the actor passes through a painful and disarticulated identification, originated in August Strindberg’s radiations of the ego (Ausstrahlungen des Ichs). Accordingly, the radiations are not only writings in the first person, but also egotistical discourse; binding the ego on the stage, the playwright’s world becomes not only a psychic experience, but also a diurnal dream lived with the eyes wide open (as in the plays The Road to Damascus and A Dream Play). Therefore, in the film The Rite (Riten, 1969, TV movie), the total and stylized actor enacts the virtue of the crime in order to re-cognize himself; in this context, the achievement of his persona confirms the thorough execution of a murder – that is to say that the actor’s visage foreshadows the melancholic soleil noir of the Universal tragedy.

References

Adler, Thomas P., “Daddy Spoke to Me!: Gods Lost and Found in Long Day’s Journey Into Night and Through a Glass Darkly”, Comparative Drama vol. 20, no. 4, 1986, p. 345.

Aristotel, Poetica, Bucarest: Iri, 1998, trad. D. M. Pippidi.

Artaud, Antonin, Teatrul şi dublul său [Le Théâtre et son double], Cluj-Napoca: Echinox, 1997, trad. Voichiţa Sasu et Diana Tihu-Suciu.

Aumont, Jacques, Ingmar Bergman. «Mes films sont l’explication de mes images», Paris: Cahiers du cinéma, 2003.

Bergman, Ingmar, Images: My Life in Film, New York: Arcade Publishing, 2007, trans. from the Swedish by Marianne Ruuth, introd. by Woody Allen.

Blake, Richard Aloysius, The Lutheran Milieu of the Films of Ingmar Bergman, New York: Arno Press, 1978 (dissertation for the degree of Dr. of Philosophy, Illinois 1972).

Botz-Bornstein, Thorsten, Films and Dreams. Tarkovsky, Bergman, Sokurov, Kubrick and Wong Kar-Wai, Lexington Books, 2008.

Boyles, Christina, “The Duality of Seeing «Darkly»: Analyzing Bergman’s Karin in Through a Glass Darkly”, South Central Review, Vol. 31, no. 1, Spring 2014, pp. 17-33.

Brook, Peter, The Empty Space. A Book About the Theatre: Deadly, Holy, Rough, Immediate, New York: Touchstone, 1968.

Cauly, Olivier, Mise(s) en scène de la répétition. Bergman, Dreyer, Ibsen, Strindberg, L’Harmattan, 2012.

Cowie, Peter, Ingmar Bergman: A Critical Biography, André Deutsch, 1992 (1982).

Gado, Frank, The Passion of Ingmar Bergman, Durham: Duke Univ. Press, 1986.

Grotowski, Jerzy, Teatru și ritual. Scrieri esențiale [Théâtre et rituel], Bucarest: Nemira, 2014, trad. Vasile Moga, préf. George Banu.

Koskinen, Maaret, “Art as Cult: Bergman’s Riten and Backanterna”, TijdSchrift voor Skandinavistiek, vol. 20 (1999), no. 1, pp. 133-147.

Smith, Lawrence D., “Play-within-a-Play or Theatre-in-Film. Ingmar Bergman’s Through a Glass Darkly”, Theatre Symposium, vol. 19, 2011, pp. 91-110.

Steene, Birgitta; Törnqvist, Egil, Strindberg on Drama and Theatre. A Source Book, Amsterdam Univ. Press, 2007.

Strindberg, August, Teatru [Théâtre], Bucarest: Univers, 1973, trad. Valeriu Munteanu, préf. Alexandru Sever.

Strindberg, A., The Road to Damascus (I, II, III), Project Gutenberg Ebook.

Szondi, Peter, Teoria dramei moderne (1880-1950) [Théorie du drame moderne 1880-1950], Cluj-Napoca: Tact, 2012, trad. Maria-Magdalena Anghelescu, George State, préf. Ştefana et Ion Pop-Curşeu.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-30

How to Cite

CÂMPEAN, A. N. . (2017). ‟LE RITE” (1969) D’INGMAR BERGMAN: L’ACTEUR-COMME-ACTEUR ENTRE L’‟ANAGNORISIS” ET LA FRAGILITÉ DE L’IDENTIFICATION. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia, 62(1), 115 –. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2017.1.07

Issue

Section

Articles