HERMENEUTIC RESPONSIBILITY IN POLITICAL JUDGEMENT. RETRIEVING FACTUAL TRUTH FROM DIRECT INTERACTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2022.3.07Keywords:
Hannah Arendt, factual truth, reproductive imagination, political judgment, hermeneutic responsibilityAbstract
In this paper, I am arguing for hermeneutic responsibility in political judgment, as it can be attributed to Arendt’s work. Political judgment is reflective judgment relying on representation by imagination and therefore only has exemplary validity. Along the line of Arendt’s Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, I point out her argument for a different generality in politics than the generality of concepts. This generality of political judgment always refers back to the particular. Only by this reference to the particular, namely to facts and situations of direct interaction, can the spectator, who undertakes the political judgment, create the public realm where action takes place. However, this task attributed to the spectator also implies the task of reshaping the public realm. These acts of giving an account of and reconsidering all over again facts handed over by narration and testimony imply the hermeneutic responsibility to unceasingly retrieve factual truth which is rooted in direct interaction.
References
Aavitsland, V.L. 2019. “The Failure of Judgment: Disgust in Arendt's Theory of Political Judgment”. In: The Journal of Speculative Philosophy. 33 (3): 537–550.
Allweiss, Lilian. 2003. “Collective Responsibility. Some reflections”. In: European Journal of Political Theory 2 (3): 307–18.
Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. 1972. Crises of the Republic: Lying in politics; Civil disobedience; On violence; Thoughts on politics and revolution. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Arendt, H. 1978. The Life of the Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Arendt, H. 1982. Kant’s Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. 1993. Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Penguin Books.
Arendt, H. 2003a. Responsibility and Judgment, ed. Jerome Kohn. New York: Schocken Books.
Arendt, H. 2003b. Denktagebuch 2, ed. Ursula Ludz, Ingeborg Nordman. Munich: Piper Verlag.
Beiner, R. 1982. “Interpretive Essay: Hannah Arendt on Judging”. In: Hannah Arendt. Kant’s Political Philosophy, ed. Ronald Beiner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Benhabib, S. 1988. “Judgment and the Moral Foundations of Politics in Arendt’s Thought”. In: Political Theory 16 (1): 29–51.
Benhabib, S. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethic. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Benhabib, S. 1994. “Hannah Arendt and the Redemptive Power of Narrative”. In: Hannah Arendt. Critical Essays, ed. Lewis Hinchman, Sandra, L., Hinchman S., 111–137. Albany: State University of New York Press (reprinted from 1990. Social Research 57 (1): 167–196).
Benhabib, S. 2003. The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. Boulder/ New York / Toronto/ Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Lanham (1st ed. 1996).
Bernstein, R. J. 1986. “Judging – the Actor and the Spectator”. In: Philosophical Profiles. Essays in a pragmatic mode, 221–238. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
Bernstein, R. J. 1997. “Provocation and Appropriation: Hannah Arendt’s Response to Martin Heidegger”. In: Constellations 4 (2): 153–171. Oxford / Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
Birmingham, P. 2006. Hannah Arendt and Human Rights. The Predicament of Common Responsibility. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Birmingham, P. 2010. “Lying world order. Political Deception and the Threat of Totalitarianism”. In: Thinking in Dark Times. Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics, ed. Roger Berkowitz, Jefferey Katz, Thomas Keenan, 73–77. New York: Fordham University Press.
Canovan, M. 1958. “Introduction”. In: Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition, vii-xx. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Canovan, M. 1983. “Arendt, Rousseau, and Human Plurality in Politics”. In: The Journal of Politics 45(2), 286–302.
Caruth. C. 2010. “Lying and History”. In: Thinking in Dark Times. Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics, ed. Roger Berkowitz, Jefferey Katz, Thomas Keenan, 79–92. New York: Fordham University Press.
Çapek, J. 2010. Action et situation : Le sens du possible entre phénoménologie et herméneutique. Hildesheim/ Zürich/ New York: Olms.
Chomsky, N. 1967. “The Responsibility of Intellectuals”. In: The New York Review of Books. Special Supplement, February 23.
Cioflec, E. 2012. “On Hannah Arendt: The Worldy In-Between of Human Beings and its Ethical Consequences”. In: South African Journal for Philosophy 31 (4): 646–663.
Cioflec, E. 2018. “Judging: Taking into Account Particular Situations”. In: Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 8: 41-47: https://doi.org/10.5840/wcp2320188184.
Demeter, A. M. 2020. “Thinking Politically, Seeing Historically. Hannah Arendt on the Method of Political Thinking”. In: Studia UBB. Philosophia. Vol. 65(3): 131-148: https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2020.3.07.
Fairweather, A., Zagzebski, L. 2001. Virtue Epistemology. Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ferrara, A. 2008. The Force of the Example: Explorations in the Paradigm of Judgment. New York: Columbia University Press.
Fine, R. 2008. “Judgment and the Reification of the Faculties: A Reconstructive Reading of Arendt’s Life of the Mind”. In: Philosophy & Social Criticism 34 (1-2): 155–174.
Habermas, J. 1994. “Hannah Arendt’s Communications Concept of Power”. In: Hannah Arendt. Critical Essays, ed. Lewis Hinchman, Sandra, L., Hinchman S., 211–230. Albany: State University of New York Press (reprinted from 1997, Social Research 44 (1): 3–23).
Herzog, A. 2004. “Hannah Arendt’s Concept of Responsibility”. In: Studies in Social and Political Thought 10: 39–52.
Kant, I. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment (CPJ). trans. ed. Paul Guyer, Nelson Matthews. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, trans., ed. Paul Guyer, Allen Wood. Cambridge/ New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. 1996. Critique of Practical Reason, trans., ed. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge / New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kristeva, J. 2008. “Refoundation as Survival: An Interrogation of Hannah Arendt”. In: Common Knowledge 14(3): 353–364.
Lederman, Shmuel. 2016. “The actor does not judge: Hannah Arendt’s theory of judgment”. In: Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (7): 727–741.
Loidolt S. 2018. Phenomenology of plurality: Hannah Arendt on political intersubjectivity. New York, NY: Routledge.
Luban, D. 1994. Explaining Dark Times. Hannah Arendt’s Theory of Theory. Critical Essays, ed. Lewis Hinchman, Sandra, L., Hinchman S., 111–137. Albany: State University of New York Press (reprinted from 1983. Social Research 57 (1), 213–248, with changes made by the author).
Marder, Michael. 2013. “Natality, Event, Revolution: The Political Phenomenology of Hannah Arendt”. In: Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 44 (3): 302–320.
McCarthy, M. 1978. “Postface”, In: Hannah Arendt, The Life of the Mind. 241–254. New York: Hartcourt.
Melaney, W. D. 2006. “Arendt’s Revision of Praxis: On Plurality and Narrative Experience”. In: Analecta Husserliana XC: 465–479.
Randell, J. 1994. “Creativity and Judgment: Kant on Reason and Imagination”. In: Rethinking Imagination: Culture and Creativity, ed. Gillian Robinson, John Randell, 87–117. London/ New York: Routledge.
Sari, Yasemin. 2018. “Arendt, Truth, and Epistemic Responsibility”. In: Arendt Studies 2: 149–170.
Steup, M. 2001. Knowledge, Truth, and Duty. Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue. New York: Oxford University Press.
Theodore, G. 2020. “Hermeneutic Responsibility: Vattimo, Gadamer, and the Impetus of Interpretive Engagement”. In: Duquesne Journal of Phenomenology, special issue Hermeneutics Today 1(1): 1–14. Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/dsp/vol1/iss1/4.
Vasterling, V. 2007. “Cognitive Theory and Phenomenology in Arendt’s and Nussbaum’s Work on Narrative”. In: Human Studies 30: 79–95.
Villa, D. 1996. Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Villa, D. 1997. “Hannah Arendt: Modernity, Alienation, and Critique”. In: Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics, ed. Craig Calhoun and John McGowan, 179–206. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Villa, D. 1999. Politics, Philosophy Terror: Essays in the Thought of Hannah Arendt. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wellmer, A. 2001. “Hannah Arendt on Judgment: The Unwritten Doctrine of Reason”. In: Judgment, Imagination and Politics: Themes from Kant and Arendt, ed. Ronald Beiner, Jennifer Nedelsky, 165–181. Boston: Rowman & Littlefield.
Yar, Majid. 2000. “From actor to spectator. Hannah Arendt’s ‘two theories’ of political judgment”. In: Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (2): 1–27.
Young-Bruehl, E. 2006. Why Arendt Matters. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
Zerilli, L. M. G. 2005. “We Feel our Freedom: Imagination and Judgment in the Thought of Hannah Arendt”. In: Political Theory 33 (2):158–188.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
