THE DIALOGICAL FORM OF PHILOSOPHICAL PRACTICE: STRUCTURING THE DISCURSIVE FLOW IN SOCRATIC DIALOGUE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2021.2s.02

Keywords:

Socratic Dialogue; Philosophical Practice; Discursive Flow; Discourse Analysis; Intersubjectivity.

Abstract

Based on the transcript of a fragment from a philosophical practice session carried by Oscar Brenifier, I flesh out several aspects of this dialogical form of philosophical practice. First, it is a form of interaction grounded in the interlocutors’ interaffection. Second, the main mechanism of carrying through the dialogic interaction is the practitioner’s repeating the other’s words, writing them down, and then questioning them, thus extracting them from the other’s discursive flow and making them shared objects for an intersubjective gaze. Third, this form of dialogue is asymmetrical: while the other is providing the “content”, the practitioner is responsible for explicating it.

References

Oscar Brenifier, La consultation philosophique, Alcofribas, 2018

Wallace Chafe, Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing, University of Chicago Press, 1994.

Michel Henry, The Essence of Manifestation, Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.

Alva Noe, Strange Tools: Art and Human Nature, Macmillan, 2015.

Emmanuel Levinas, Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-30

How to Cite

COSMESCU, A. (2021). THE DIALOGICAL FORM OF PHILOSOPHICAL PRACTICE: STRUCTURING THE DISCURSIVE FLOW IN SOCRATIC DIALOGUE. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia, 66(2 Supplement), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2021.2s.02