HEIDEGGER’S EQUIPMENT VS. GIBSON’S AFFORDANCES. WHY THEY DIFFER AND HOW THEY ARTICULATE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2021.2s.03Keywords:
Heidegger, Gibson, affordance, equipment, perception.Abstract
My main objective in this article will be to compare Heidegger’s description of the way we perceive our environment in everyday coping – which is based on the concept of equipment (Zeug) – and James Gibson’s theory of affordance perception. More precisely, I will discuss whether equipment and affordance can be equated. In contrast to some interpretations, I will defend that they cannot: equipment and affordances refer to different ontological kinds and the perceptual or cognitive processes that are implied in each case have nothing in common. In addition, I will defend that distinguishing equipment and affordances is a key step towards a more comprehensive account of the way we perceive and deal with the possibilities offered by our environment, and that Heidegger’s and Gibson’s accounts, far from being mutually exclusive, complement each other. Some work has however to be done in order to articulate them in a coherent theoretical framework.
References
Blok, V. (2014). Being-in-the-World as Being-in-Nature: An ecological Perspective on Being and Time. Studia Phaenomenologica, 14, 215-235.
Bruineberg, J., & Rietveld, E. (2014). Self-organization, free energy minimization, and optimal grip on a field of affordances. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, 599.
Buxbaum, L. J., Sirigu, A., Schwartz, M. F., & Klatzky, R. (2003). Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia, 41(8), 1091-1113.
Carman, T. (1994). On being social: A reply to Olafson. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 37:2, 203-223.
Chemero, A. (2009). Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA, London, England: The MIT Press.
Christensen, C. B. (2007). What are the categories in Sein und Zeit? Brandom on Heidegger on Zuhandenheit. European Journal of Philosophy, 15(2), 159-185.
Costall, A. (1997). The meaning of things. Costall, A. (1997). The meaning of things. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, 41(1), 76-85.
Costall, A. (2012). Canonical affordances in context. AVANT 3, 85–93.
Declerck G. (2020). Transcendental conditions of human technology. A Heideggerian proposal. Límite. Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy and Psychology, L. Lobo-Navas & M. Heras-Escribano (Eds.), Special Issue “Cognition and Technology: A 4E Perspective”.
De Renzi, E. and Lucchelli, F. (1988) Ideational apraxia. Brain, 111, 1173–1185.
De Renzi, E., Faglioni, P., & Sorgato, P. (1982). Modality-specific and supramodal mechanisms of apraxia. Brain, 105(2), 301-312.
Dings, R. (2018). Understanding phenomenological differences in how affordances solicit action. An exploration. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 681-699.
Dotov, D. G., Nie, L., & De Wit, M. M. (2012). Understanding affordances: history and contemporary development of Gibson’s central concept. Avant: the Journal of the Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard.
Dreyfus, H.L. (1991). Being-in-the-world. A commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, Massachusetts / London, England: MIT Press.
Dreyfus, H. L. (1996). The current relevance of Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of embodiment. The Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 4(4), 1-16.
Dreyfus, H. L. (2005). Overcoming the myth of the mental: How philosophers can profit from the phenomenology of everyday expertise. In Proceedings and addresses of the American Philosophical Association (Vol. 79, No. 2, pp. 47-65). American Philosophical Association.
Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 79-84).
Gibson, J.J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsadle, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1st edition 1979.
Gibson, E. J. (2000). Where is the information for affordances?. Ecological Psychology, 12(1), 53-56.
Gibson, J.J. (1975). Affordances and behavior. In E. Reed and R. Jones (eds.), Reasons for realism: Selected essays of James J. Gibson. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gibson, J.J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In E.E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, Acting and knowing. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gibson, J.J. (1982). Notes on affordances. In E. Reed & R. Jones (Eds.), Reasons for realism: Selected essays of James J. Gibson (pp. 401–418). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Gibson, E. J., & Pick, A. D. (2000). An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. Oxford University Press, USA.
Guignon, C. B. (1983). Heidegger and the Problem of Knowledge. Hackett Publishing.
Haugeland, J. (1982). Heidegger on being a person. Noûs, 15-26.
Heft, H. (1989). Affordances and the body: An intentional analysis of Gibson's ecological approach to visual perception. Journal for the theory of social behaviour, 19(1), 1-30.
Heidegger, M. (1925). History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena (GA 20). Translated by T. Kisiel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992. Abbreviated as HCT.
Heidegger, M. (1927). Being and Time. Translated by J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson. New York: Harper & Row, 1962. Abbreviated as BT.
Heidegger, M. (1975). The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Revised edition. Translation A. Hofstadter. Indiana University Press, 1988. Abbreviated as BPP.
Heidegger, M. (1976). Logic: The question of truth. Translation T. Sheehan, Indiana University Press, 2001.
Heras-Escribano, M., & Pinedo-García, D. (2018). Affordances and landscapes: Overcoming the nature–culture dichotomy through niche construction theory. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2294.
Johnson-Frey, S.H. (2004). The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2).
Johnson-Frey, S.H. (2003a). What’s so special about human tool use? Neuron 39, 201-204.
Johnson-Frey, S.H. (2003b). Cortical mechanisms of human tool use. In Taking Action: Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on the Problem of Intentional Acts (Johnson-Frey, S.H., ed.), pp. 185–217, MIT Press.
Johnson-Frey, S.H. and Grafton, S.T. (2003). From ‘acting on’ to ‘acting with’: the functional anatomy of action representation. In Space Coding and Action Production (Prablanc, C. et al., eds.), pp. 127–139, Elsevier.
Kadar, A., & Effken, J. (1994). Heideggerian meditations on an alternative ontology for ecological psychology: A response to Turvey's (1992) proposal. Ecological Psychology, 6(4), 297-341.
Lanamäki, A., Thapa, D., & Stendal, K. (2015). What does a chair afford? A Heideggerian perspective of affordances. In Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (Vol. 6, No. 2015, pp. 1-13).
Malpas, J. (2008). Heidegger’s topology: being, place, world. MIT press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. Trad. Smith, C. London: Routledge. London: Routledge.
Michaels, C. F. (2003). Affordances: Four points of debate. Ecological psychology, 15(2), 135-148.
Mulhall, S. (2001). Inheritance and Originality: Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kierkegaard: Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kierkegaard. Clarendon Press.
Neisser U. (1988). Five kinds of self-knowledge. Philosophical Psychology, 1:35–59.
Noble, W. G. (1981). Gibsonian theory and the pragmatist perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 11(1), 65-85.
Ochipa, C., Rothi, L.J.G., Heilman, K.M. (1992). Conceptual apraxia in Alzheimer's disease. Brain, 115(4), 1061-1071.
Ochipa, C., Rothi, L. G., & Heilman, K. M. (1989). Ideational apraxia: A deficit in tool selection and use. Annals of Neurology: Official Journal of the American Neurological Association and the Child Neurology Society, 25(2), 190-193.
Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological psychology, 26(4), 325-352.
Rochat, P. (1995). Perceived reachability for self and for others by 3-to 5-year-old children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59(2), 317-333.
Sheehan, T. (2018). Sein und Zeit §18: A Paraphrastic Translation. Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual, 8, 1-20.
Sirigu, A., Cohen, L., Duhamel, J. R., Pillon, B., Dubois, B., & Agid, Y. (1995). A selective impairment of hand posture for object utilization in apraxia. Cortex, 31(1), 41-55.
Slama, P. (2018). D’une réduction phénoménologique pratique. Scheler, Heidegger et l’appel de la conscience. Philosophiques, 45(1), 159–180.
Slors, M., & Jongepier, F. (2014). Mineness without minimal selves. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 21(7-8), 193-219.
Stoffregen, T. A., Gorday, K. M., Sheng, Y. Y., & Flynn, S. B. (1999). Perceiving affordances for another person’s actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 120.
Stoffregen, T. A. (2003). Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. Ecological psychology, 15(2), 115-134.
Turner, P. (2005). Affordance as context. Interacting with computers, 17(6), 787-800.
Turvey, M. T. (1992). Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological psychology, 4(3), 173-187.
Turvey, M.T., & Shaw, R.E. (1979). The primacy of perceiving: An ecological reformulation of perception for understanding memory. In L.G. Wilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research (pp. 167-222). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R. E., Reed, E. S., & Mace, W. M. (1981). Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981). Cognition, 9(3), 237-304.
Valenti, S. S., & Gold, J. M. (1991). Social affordances and interaction I: Introduction. Ecological Psychology, 3(2), 77-98.
Vasterling, V. (2015). Heidegger’s hermeneutic account of cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 1145-1163.
Warren, W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 10(5), 683-703.
Warren, W. H., & Whang, S. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 13(3), 371-383.
Wheeler, M. (2017). Martin Heidegger. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
Zahorik, P., & Jenison, R. L. (1998). Presence as being-in-the-world. Presence, 7(1), 78-89.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
