THE PARADOX OF VIRTUAL EMBODIMENT: THE BODY SCHEMA IN VIRTUAL REALITY AESTHETIC EXPERIENCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2021.2s.09

Keywords:

Aesthetics; Virtual Reality; Embodiment; Digital art; Bodily awareness.

Abstract

New technologies implied in art creation and exhibition are modifying the traditional landmarks on which aesthetics has always focused. In particular, Virtual Reality artworks call the body into question when it comes to living a bodily experience within exhibitions accessible through technological tools that expand the human body’s capabilities and motor potential. The body's status is challenged in its traditional unity, that of a subject of experience living in a world where the spatial configuration is relatively constant. Conversely, in Virtual Reality, the spatial aspect is novel to our body which needs to adapt to unpredicted and disorientating motor schemas. Therefore, the Virtual Reality aesthetic experience takes place into a novel configuration for the human body: hybrid and split into the virtual realm.

References

Chagnon K., L’œuvre d’art comme «quasi-sujet»? in Mikel Dufrenne et l’esthétique. Entre Phénoménologie et philosophie de la nature, curated by J.B. Dussert & A. Jdey, Presses universitaires de Rennes, Rennes 2016.

Di Cesare G., Di Dio C., Rochat M. J., Sinigaglia C., Bruschweiler-Stern N., Stern D. N., Rizzolatti G., “The neural correlates of ‘vitality form’recognition: an fMRI study: This work is dedicated to Daniel Stern, whose immeasurable contribution to science has inspired our research” in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 9(7), 2014, pp. 951-960.

Dufrenne M., Art et politique, UGE, Paris 1974.

Dufrenne M., La notion d’a priori, P.U.F., Paris 1959.

Dufrenne M., Phénoménologie de l’expérience esthétique, tome I, P.U.F., Paris 1953.

Floridi, L., The onlife manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected era, Springer, New York 2015.

Gallese V., Guerra M., Lo schermo empatico. Cinema e neuroscienze, Cortina, Milano 2015.

Incao S., Rea F., Sciutti A., “A Self for robots: core elements and ascription by humans”, 2021, Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) 2021 Workshop Robo-Identity: Artificial identity and multi-embodiment, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5645583

Kuchelmeister V., “The virtual (reality) museum of immersive experiences”, in Proceedings of the Conference on Electronic Visualization and the Arts, 2018.

Lee M., How to Grow a Robot. Cambridge, Massachussets: MIT Press, 2020.

Merleau-Ponty M., L’Œil et l’esprit, Gallimard, Paris 1964.

Merleau-Ponty M., Le Visible et l’Invisible, Gallimard, Paris 1964.

Merleau-Ponty M., Phénoménologie de la perception, Gallimard, Paris 1945.

Moulin-Frier C., et al., “DAC-h3: A Proactive Robot Cognitive Architecture to Acquire and Express Knowledge About the World and the Self”, IEEE Trans. Cogn. Dev. Syst., 10(4), 2018, pp. 1005–1022.

Rizzolatti G., Sinigaglia C., “The mirror mechanism: a basic principle of brain function” in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(12), 2016.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-30

How to Cite

INCAO, S., & MAZZOLA, C. (2021). THE PARADOX OF VIRTUAL EMBODIMENT: THE BODY SCHEMA IN VIRTUAL REALITY AESTHETIC EXPERIENCE. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia, 66(2 Supplement), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2021.2s.09