IMAGINATIVE COMMUNICATION AND COMMUNITY: THE PHENOMENOLOGICAL-ENACTIVE APPROACH TO THE CO-CONSTITUTION OF PUBLIC PHENOMENA

Authors

  • Mindaugas BRIEDIS Professor, Institute of Communication, Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania. E-mail: mbriedis@mruni.eu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4962-1794
  • Mariano NAVARRO Professor, Escuela de Comunicación, Universidad Panamericana, México. E-mail: mnavarroa@up.edu.mx

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2021.3.08

Keywords:

Phenomenology, Enactivism, Communication, Embodied Cognition, Perceptual Phantasy, Intersubjectivity, Public Phenomena.

Abstract

An ever-evolving phenomenological-enactive perspective can expand our reflection on the entanglement between enactive subjects and their living ecologies. This article applies certain classical phenomenological projects and their enactive extension to public phenomena (objects, spaces, events, etc.). As an instance of the embodied cognition discourse, this research also aims to thematize the enactive, affective, and intersubjective aspects of the relation to the (urban) Lebenswelt. This may help in understanding both the potential of the phenomenological-enactive methodology and the processes of an embodied intersubjective co-constitution of a public ethos. Theoretical ideas presented in the article are illustrated with reflections on some concrete public phenomena.

References

Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. New York: Verso.

Certeau, M. (1988). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.

Colombetti, G. (2017). The Embodied and Situated Nature of Moods. Philosophia 45(4).

Crippen, M., Klement, V. (2020). “Architectural Values, Political Affordances and Selective Permeability”, Open Philosophy 3 (1): 462–77.

Dickerman, L. (2011). Diego Rivera: Murals for the Museum of Modern Art. Museum of Modern Art.

Fehige, Y. J. H., Wiltsche, K. (1991). “The Body, Thought Experiments, and Phenomenology.” In T. Horowitz, Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy. Rowman and Littlefield, pp.69–89.

Fingerhut, J. (2021). “Enacting Media. An Embodied Account of Enculturation Between Neuromediality and New Cognitive Media Theory.” In Frontiers in Psychology.

Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gallagher, S. (2012). Multiple aspects in the sense of agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1), 15–31.

Gallagher, Shaun (2017). Enactivist Interventions: Rethinking the Mind. Oxford University Press.

Gallagher, S., Varga, S. (2020). “Meshed Architecture of Performance as a Model of Situated Cognition.” Frontiers in Psychology 11: 2140.

Gallagher, S. (2021). Peformance/Art: The Venetian Lectures. Mimesis International. Open Access.

Gibson, J. J. (1950). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Psychology Press.

Heidegger, M. (1968). What Is Called Thinking? (GA 8). Harper & Row.

Heidegger, M. (2008). “The Question Concerning Technology.” In Basic Writings. Harper Collins, pp.143–212.

Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: A General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. HarperCollins.

Husserl, E. (1932/2008). The Phenomenology of a Communicative Community. In Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916–1937). Husserliana. Vol. 39. Ed. By R. Sowa. Dordrecht: Springer.

Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Martinus Nijhoff.

Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental philosophy. Translated by D. Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Husserl, E. (1973). Logical investigations. Translated by J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge.

Husserl, E. (2005). Collected Works: Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory (1898–1925). Springer.

Katz, J., & Csordas, T. (2003). Phenomenological ethnography in sociology and anthropology. Ethnography, 4(3), 275–288. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lavrinec, J. (2011a). “Revitalization of Public Space: From ‘Non-Places’ to Creative Playgrounds”, Santalka: Filosofija, Komunikacija 19 (2): 70–75.

Lavrinec, J. (2011b). “Urbanistinė choregrafija: kūnas, emocijos ir ritualai.” Santalka: Filosofija, Komunikacija 19 (1): 62–73.

Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on Cities. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science.

MacAdam, A. (2021). Horizontal Vertigo: A City Called Mexico. Pantheon Books.

Maturana, Humberto R.; Varela, Francisco J. (1972). “Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living”. Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science (1 ed.). Dordrecht: Reidel.

Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. Oxford University Press, London.

Murakami, Y. (2013). “Affection of Contact and Transcendental Telepathy in Schizophrenia and Autism.” Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences 12 (1): 179–94.

Ricœur, P. (2007). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.

Sartre, J-P. (2004). The Imaginary: A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination. Routledge.

Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., and Di Paolo, E. A. (Eds.). 2010. Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm to Cognitive Science, (pp. 89–122). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

BRIEDIS, M., & NAVARRO, M. (2021). IMAGINATIVE COMMUNICATION AND COMMUNITY: THE PHENOMENOLOGICAL-ENACTIVE APPROACH TO THE CO-CONSTITUTION OF PUBLIC PHENOMENA. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia, 66(3), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2021.3.08

Issue

Section

Articles