SHOULD WE SUSPEND THE TRUTH TO PREVENT HARM?

Authors

  • Olusola Victor OLANIPEKUN Department of Philosophy, Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife. Osun State. Nigeria. olanipekuno@oauife.edu.ng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2022.2.10

Keywords:

Truth-telling, Harm, Liberal Science, Humanitarianism, Situational Moral Relativism.

Abstract

The paper examines the ethics of truth telling and free speech in Jonathan Rauch’s "The Humanitarian Threat". The central question is this: “Should we suspend the truth to prevent harm?”. Both humanitarians and the anti-humanitarians supply different responses to this question. While the humanitarians supplied a positive answer, Rauch argues that the anti-humanitarian posture of the exponents of liberalism supplied a negative answer. The paper considers the humanitarian argument that puts the welfare of the people above the truth or anything else. Meanwhile, for the anti-humanitarians, the right to speak the truth must be guaranteed at all time. This paper argues that, in practice, the morality of truth telling is not only context bound, it also depends on what the truth is meant to achieve. Thus, the suspension of the truth may be consistent with morality in some medical and sensitive security situations due to the tendency to cause harm. The paper does not argue that the truth be suspended arbitrarily or for mischievous reasons. It only concludes by identifying some practical situations under which suspension of the truth may not be inconsistent with morality.

References

Aristotle, Aristotle Politics, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1905.

Audi R., The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Bennett, J.T., “The Harm in Hate Speech: A Critique of the Empirical and Legal Bases of Hate Speech Regulation” in Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Vol. 43:3(2016):451.

Bretischneider, C., When the State Speaks, What Should It Say! How Democracies Can Protect Expression and Promote Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.

Bury, J.B., A History of Freedom of Thought. London: Effrey Kraus, 2004.

Crenshaw, K.W., Words that wound. Westview: Boulder, Co., 1993.

Dry, M., “Political Philosophy and Its Relation to American Constitutional Law: A Consideration of Mill,” in Meikle John ed., Constitutional Commentary, vol. 11(2000):81.

Fish, S., “There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech, and It’s a Good Thing, Too” in Daniel Bonevac, ed. Today’s Moral Issues. London: Mayfield Publishing Company, 1996.

Haidt J. and Graham J., “When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals May Not Recognize” in SOC. JUST. RES. vol. 20, (2007):98-99.

Kant, I., Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (Edited and translated by Allen W. Wood). New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.

Kant, I., Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy, translated by Kant, I., Grounding for the Metaphysics of Moral. Trans. by James Ellington. Third edition. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1993.

Kagan, E., “Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V.” in University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 60, (1993):873.

Kalven, H., Jr., A Worthy Tradition: Freedom of Speech in America. New York: Harper & Row, 1988.

Lewis W., Beck. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949.

Meiklejohn, A., Political Freedom: The Constitutional Powers of the People. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1960.

Mill, J.S., On Liberty. Stefan Collini, ed., Cambridge U. Press, 1989.

MILL, J. S., On Liberty, edited by Alburey Castell. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, Inc., 1947.

Mill, J.S., On Liberty. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1978.

Mill, D. V., “Freedom of Speech,” in Edward Zalta ed. The SEP, 2021.

Rachels, J., The Elements of Moral Philosophy. New York: McGraw Hill, 2012.

Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, London: Routledge, 1981.

Schauer, F., “Harry Kalven and the Perils of Particularism” in University of Chicago Law Review, vol.56(1989): 397.

Slagle, M., “An Ethical Exploration of Free Expression and the Problem of Hate Speech” Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 24(2009):238.

Tilley, J., “The Problem for Normative Cultural Relativism” in Ratio Juris. Vol.11, No. 3 (1998): 283.

West, T.G., &West, G.S., Plato and Aristophanes: Four Texts on Socrates 73 (24b-c) Cornell: Cornell University Press, 1984.

Yong, C., “Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech?” in Res Publica, vol. 17(2011):390.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Journalism_ethics_and_standards&oldid=1072822084

Downloads

Published

2022-08-12

How to Cite

OLANIPEKUN, O. V. (2022). SHOULD WE SUSPEND THE TRUTH TO PREVENT HARM?. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia, 67(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2022.2.10

Issue

Section

Articles