(RE)CONSIDERING GEOENGINEERING IN AN ETHICAL BIOCULTURAL FRAMEWORK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2023.2.02Keywords:
environmental ethics, geoengineering, sustainability, biocultural ethics, environmental psychology.Abstract
In the perspective of biocultural homogenization and the increasingly prominent use of technology, environmental ethics faces new challenges. Development policies, governance, and economic factors impose new ways of understanding and managing coexistence. Phenomena such as pandemics, global warming, migratory phenomena, the expansion of urban and rural areas, and the development of large-scale monocultures show us that human agency, resources, the environment, and surroundings are increasingly intertwined, both physically and metaphysically, in an increasingly encompassing organism where the dissociation between the local and the global becomes difficult to achieve. With a wide range of actions and relationships, environmental psychology and ethics have the task of rethinking the relationship between cultural elements and the biosphere, in order to achieve a balance between sensibility, responsibility, and responsivity. In this article, I aim to illustrate that a biocultural ethical framework emphasizing socio-environmental justice, applied to geoengineering, not only promotes global socio-environmental sustainability but also recognizes the crucial significance of local ecosystems in climate regulation and biodiversity conservation. To do so, I will briefly present some theoretical elements related to the importance of environmental psychology in understanding the connection between individuals and the surrounding environment. Then, I will succinctly present the concept of the ”3Hs” and its implication on biocultural ethics, and subsequently integrate specific elements of biocultural ethics into the analysis of geoengineering ethics to illustrate the need for a perspective that takes this into account. Through this endeavor, I intend to emphasize the vital role of a holistic, multidimensional perspective that guides individual values and community policies towards sustainable practices, ensuring social cohesion and dialogue, respecting the coexistence of life forms, and protecting their habitats.References
Ackerman, T. (2017). ”A combined ethical and scientific analysis of large-scale tests of solar climate engineering”. In AGU Fall meeting abstracts., http://adsabs.harva rd.edu/abs/2017A GUFMG C53H.05A.
Averill, J.R. (1973) ”Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress”, Psychological Bulletin, 80, pp. 286-303.
Bellamy, Rob. (2016) “A Sociotechnical Framework for Governing Climate Engineering.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41(2), pp. 135–162.
Blackstock, J., & Low, S. (Eds.). (2019) Geoengineering our climate? Ethics, politics, and governance. London: Routledge.
Callicott JB (1994) Earth’s insights: a multicultural survey of ecological ethics from the Mediterranean Basin to the Australian outback. University of California Press, Berkley.
Cherry, Todd L., Steffen Kallbekken, Stephan Kroll, and David M. McEvoy. (2021) “Does Solar Geoengineering Crowd out Climate Change Mitigation Efforts? Evidence from a Stated Preference Referendum on a Carbon Tax.” Climatic Change 165(1):6.
Dooley, K., & Kartha, S. (2018). Land-based negative emissions: Risks for climate mitigation and impacts on sustainable development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18(1), 79–98.
Gardiner SM, Fragnière A (2018) ”The tollgate principles of geoengineering”. Ethics Policy Environ 21(2):143–174.
Heyward, C. (2019). ”Normative issues of geoengineering technologies”. T. M. Letcher (Ed.), Managing global warming—An interface of technology and human issues. London: Academic Press, pp. 639-657.
Keith, David. (2021) “Toward Constructive Disagreement about Geoengineering.” Science 374(6569):812–15.
McDaniel, J. (2002): ”Spirituality and Sustainability”, Conservation Biology, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 1461-1464.
Moor, J.H. (2005) ”Why We Need Better Ethics for Emerging Technologies.” Ethics Inf Technol 7, pp. 111–119.
Morrow, D. (2019). A mission-driven research program on solar geoengineering could promote justice and legitimacy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Nov., 1–23.
Moser, G. (2009) Introducere în psihologia mediului, Iași, Polirom.
Nericcio, L. (2018). ”Consequential principles concerning the morality of geoengineering.” Philosophy graduate theses & dissertations. University of Colorado.
Neculau, A.; Curelaru, M. (2003). ”Reprezentări sociale”. A. Neculau (coord.) Manual de psihologie socială Iaşi: Polirom, pp. 283-307.
Orr, D. W. (2002): ”Four Challenges of Sustainability.”, Conservation Biology, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 1457-1460.
Parodi, O.; Ayestaran, I.; Banse, G. (2011) Sustainable development. Relationships to culture, knowledge and ethics. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruher Studien Technik und Kultur 3.
Rickles W, Quaas MF, Ricke K, Quaas J, Moreno Cruz J, Smulders S. (2018). Turning down the global thermostat. Kiel Working Paper.
Rozzi R, May RH Jr, Chapin III FS, Massardo F, Gavin MC, Klaver I, Pauchard A, Nuñez MA, Simberloff D(eds) (2018). ”From biocultural homogenization to biocultural conservation”. Ecology and ethics series, vol 3. Springer International Publishing.
Rozzi R (2012) ”Biocultural ethics: The vital links between the inhabitants, their habits and regional habitats”. Environ Eth 34:27–50.
Rossi, R., Massardo, F. Poole, A. (2020) ”The “3Hs” (Habitats, Habits, Co-in-Habitants) of the Biocultural Ethic: A “Philosophical Lens” to Address Global Changes in the Anthropocene”, L. Valera L. and J. C. Castilla J.C. (eds.), Global Changes, Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment 46.
Rozzi R. (2003) Biodiversity and social wellbeing in South America. Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS). UNESCO-EOLSS.
Rozzi, R. (2015). ”Earth Stewardship and the biocultural ethic: latin-American perspectives”. In: Rozzi R, Stuart Chapin F, Callicott JB, Pickett STA, Power ME, Armesto JJ, May Jr RH (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 87–112.
Rozzi, R. (2013) ”Biocultural ethics: from biocultural homogenization toward biocultural conservation”. In: Rozzi R, Pickett STA, Palmer C, Armesto JJ, Callicott JB (eds) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world: values, philosophy, and action. Springer, Dordrecht, 113–136
Rozzi R, Arango X, Massardo F, Anderson C, Heidinger K, Moses K (2008) ”Field environmental philosophy and biocultural conservation: the Omora Ethnobotanical Park educational program”. Environ Ethics 30(3):325–336.
Royal Society. (2009), Geoengineering the Climate: Science, governance and uncertainty, The Royal Society, London.
Seligman, M.E.P. (1975), Helpless, Freeman, San Francisco.
Stocks, D. (1978), ”Environmental Psychology”, Annual Review of Psychology, 29, pp. 253-295.
Scott, D. (2018). ”Ethics of climate engineering: Chemical capture of carbon dioxide from air.” HYLE– International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 24, pp.55–77.
Shue, H. (2018). ”Mitigation gambles: Uncertainty, urgency and the last gamble possible.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2119), pp. 15–20.
Smith, P. T. (2020). “Legitimacy and Non-Domination in Solar Radiation Management Research,” in The Ethics of “Geoengineering the Global Climate, eds G. Stephen, C. McKinnon, and A. Fragniere, Routledge: Milton Park.
Stevenson, H., Dryzek J, (2014) Democratizing Global Climate Governance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Stoenescu, C. (2016), Etica mediului: argumente rezonabile și întâmpinări critice, Institutul European, Iași.
Sturloni, G. (2017), Planeta intoxicată. Ne vom supraviețui nouă înșine? Editura Seneca Lucius Annaeus, București.
Wagner, G., & Merk, C. (2019). ”Moral hazard and solar geoengineering”, Governance of the deployment of solar geoengineering—Harvard project on climate agreements, Harvard University, pp. 135-149.
Wolff, J. (2019). ”Fighting risk with risk: Solar radiation management, regulatory drift, and minimal justice”. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Nov. pp. 1–20.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
