THE HISTORICAL SPECIFICITY OF CAPITALISM, AND ITS CONSEQUENCES: REFLECTIONS ON POSTONE’S READING OF MARX AND MARXISM

Authors

  • Botond SZILÁGYI PhD candidate, Doctoral School in Philosophy, Faculty of History and Philosophy, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. E-mail: botond.szilagyi@ubbcluj.ro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2023.2.04

Keywords:

history, historical time, logic of history, capitalism, traditional Marxism, Moishe Postone

Abstract

Whether we think history has a definite logic of its own, or is merely the emergent quality of an irreducible contingency – it is usually taken as granted that it the same way in all its course. This is the case with some philosophers who argue against a conception of history as having an inherent logic. In this paper I present Postone’s critical reexamination of Marxian categories and argue that based on his project, we can criticize the presupposition of the “sameness” of history. For although there is no transhistorically valid “logic of history”, something like it is constituted by the functioning of capitalism’s elementary categories.

References

Castoriadis, Cornelius, The Imaginary Institution of Society, The MIT Press, 1998.

Fracchia, Joseph “Time, Labor and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory by Moishe Postone”, in History and Theory, Vol. 34, No. 4/1995, Wiley for Wesleyan University, 355–371.

Jay, Martin “Marx After Marxism”, in New German Critique, No.60/1993, Duke University Press, 181–191. 186.

Laclau, Ernesto, “Articulation and the Limits of Metaphor”, in Ernesto Laclau, The Rhetorical Foundations of Society, Verso, 2014, 53–78.

Laclau, Ernesto, “Structure, History and the Political”, in Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau, Slavoj Žižek, Contingency, Hegemony, Universality – Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Verso, 2000, 182–212.

Laclau, Ernesto, “Why Constructing a People is the Main Task of Radical Politics”, in Ernesto Laclau, The Rhetorical Foundations of Society, Verso, 2014

Marquard, Odo, “Universal History and Multiversal History”, in Odo Marquard, In Defense of the Accidental, transl. by Robert M. Wallace, Oxford University Press, 1991, 50–70.

Marquard, Odo, Dificultăți cu filosofia istoriei, transl. by Maria-Magdalena Anghelescu Tact, 2014.

Meiksins Wood, Ellen, Democracy against Capitalism – Rethinking Historical Materialism, Verso, 2016.

Meiksins Wood, Ellen, The Origin of Capitalism, Verso, 2017.

Miller, Karen, “The Question of Time in Postone’s Time, Labor and Social Domination”, in Historical Materialism, 12/3, 2004, Brill, 209–237.

Murthy, Viren, “Moishe Postone’s Historical Time: Capital, the Holocaust, and Jewish Marxism” in Critical Historical Studies, Spring/2020, The University of Chicago, 43–62.

Postone, Moishe, „A Tőke újragondolása a Grundrisse fényében”, transl. by Szilágyi Botond in Kellék. No. 59. ProPhilosophia Foundation, 2018. 7-29.

Postone, Moishe: History and Heteronomy. Selected Essays. The University of Tokyo, Center for Philosophy, 2009.

Postone, Moishe: Time, Labor and Social Domination, Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Tőkei Ferenc: A társadalmi formák elméletéhez. Kossuth, 1971.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-25

How to Cite

SZILÁGYI, B. (2023). THE HISTORICAL SPECIFICITY OF CAPITALISM, AND ITS CONSEQUENCES: REFLECTIONS ON POSTONE’S READING OF MARX AND MARXISM. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia, 68(2), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2023.2.04

Issue

Section

Articles