THE BYZANTINE ICONIC REPRESENTATION OF THE CHERUBIM: SCRIPTURAL REFERENCE POINTS

Authors

  • Stelian PAȘCA-TUȘA Lecturer PhD, Faculty of Orthodox Theology, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: stelianpascatusa@gmail.com. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3162-5519
  • Ioan POPA-BOTA Associate Researcher PhD, Faculty of Orthodox Theology, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: popabota@yahoo.com.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbto.2019.1.01

Keywords:

cherubim, iconic morphology, hermeneia, Miron Cristea, Dionysius of Fourna, Ezekiel, Tetramorph

Abstract

The aim of this study is to tackle a subject of iconography from a Scriptural perspective. In other words, we wish to study the extent to which the iconic morphology of the cherubim abides by the details mentioned in the Holy Book and assumes the theological message it conveys. We are aware that the Holy Scripture is not the only source for iconography. Icon painters can also use other sources when creating their artistic representations. However, if the morphology they represent originates in the Holy Scripture, then it is compulsory that the elements taken from the biblical texts should be correct and not at all distorted. In our research, we shall focus especially on the Tetramorph, a morphology that has greatly challenged the creativity of icon painters, in order to clarify the mystery of its origin. Contrary to the general view, some terminologists and icon painters considered this morphology proper to the group of the seraphim and not to that of the cherubim. In our endeavour, we shall also use the method of contextualisation and linguistic analysis, but the main working method is specific to the Christian East and places primacy on the unity of the text and the integrity of the theological message.

References

Albright, W.F. “What were the Cherubim?.” BA 1 (1938): 1-3.

Block, D.I. The Book of Ezekiel· Chapters 1-24.In NICOT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997.

Carruthers, Mary J. “Ars oblivionalis, ars inveniendi:The Cherub Figure and the Arts of Memory,” Gesta 48.2 Making Thoughts, Making Pictures, Making Memories: A special issue in Honor of Mary J. Carruthers (2009): 99-117.

Chirilă, Ioan. “Cunoașterea lui Dumnezeu în Vechiul Testament prin teofanei și anghelofanie.” [Knowing God in the Old Testament through theophany and angelophany] Anuarul Facultății de Teologie Ortodoxă 1 [Annual of the Faculty of Orthodox Theology 1] (1998).

———. “Porţile cerului. O reabordare a teologiei icoanei din perspectiva dimensiunii simbolice şi transcendente a actului liturgic.” [The gates of Heaven. A reapproach of the theology of icon from the perpective of the symbolic and transcendant dimension of the liturgical act] In Caietele Echinox. Teoria și practica imaginii. Imaginarul cultural [The Echinox Notebooks. Theory and practice of the image. Cultural imagination], vol. 2. Cluj-Napoca: Dacia, 2001.

———. Fragmentarium exegetic filonian [Veinal exegetic collection of fragments]. Cluj-Napoca: Limes, 2002.

Cooper, Lamar E. “Ezekiel.” In The New American Commentary 17. Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2001.

Cristea, Elie Miron. Iconografia și întocmirile din interiorul bisericii răsăritene [Iconography and compilations from within the Eastern Church]. Sibiu: Tiparul tipografiei arhidiecezane, 1905.

Dyonisius of Fourna. Erminia picturii bizantine [Hermeneia of the Painting Art]. Bucharest: Sofia, 2000.

Eichler, Raanan. “Cherub: A History of Interpretation.” Biblica 96.1 (2015): 26-38.

———. “When God Abandoned the Garden of Eden: A Forgotten Reading of Genesis 3:24.” Vetus Testamentum 65 (2015): 20-32.

Flavius, Josephus. Antichităţi iudaice, [Jewish antiquities]. Vol. 1. Translated by Ion Acsan. Bucharest: Hasefer, 2002.

Freedman David and M.P. O'Connor. “bWrK.(kerub).” In Johannes Botterweck, Helmer Ringgren and Fabry, Heinz-Josef (eds.). Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament. Vol. 7. Translated by David Green. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1995.

Gavrilovic, Andela. “The Representation of the Cherub in the Narthex of the Decani Monastery Above the Portal Leading to the Nave. Contribution to the Research of the Iconography and Meaning of the Cherub in Serbian Medieval Art.” Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts 46 (2018): 13-34.

Haran, M. “The Ark and the Cherubim.” IEJ 9 (1959).

Irenaeus. Adversus haeresis. In K. Stevenson and M. Gluerup, “Ezekiel, Daniel.” In Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture OT. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2008.

Kmosko, M. “Kerub und Kurib.” BZ 11 (1913): 225-234.

Launderville, D. “Ezekiel's Cherub: A promising symbol or a dangerous idol?.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 65.2 (2003): 165-183.

Lee, Lydia. “‘You Were the (Divine) Cherub’: A Potential Challenge to Yhwh's Sole Divinity in Ezekiel 28.14.” Journal for the Study of The Old Testament 41.1 (2016): 99-116.

Liturghier Pastoral [Pastoral Liturgical Texts]. Iași: Trinitas, 2004.

Middlemas, Jill. The divine Image. Tubbingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014. 69.

Pașca-Tușa, Stelian. “Iconizarea serafimilor – reperele biblice și patristice care au stat la baza realizării acestei morfologii iconice și a mesajului ei teologic.” [The iconic representation of seraphim – biblical and patristic reference points on which this iconic morphology and its theological message were based]In In honorem pr. prof. univ. dr. Vasile Stanciu. Edited by Daniel Mocanu. Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană, 2018.

———. “Implicațiile teologice ale reprezentărilor heruvimilor în sanctuarul biblic.” [Theological implications of the cherubim’s representations in the biblical sanctury] In Icoană. Mărturie creștină. Totalitarism [Icon. Christian testimony. Totalitarianism]. Edited by Vasile Stanciu și Cristian Sonea. Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană, 2017.

Philo, On the cherubim (De Cherubim), trans. by F. Colson and G. Whitaker. Harvard: University Press, Cambridge, 2014.

Rabinowitz, Louis I. “Cherub in the Aggadah.” In Fred Skolnik et al. (eds.). Encyclopaedia judaica. Vol. 4. Farmington Hills: Keter Publishing House, 2007.

Sarna, N.M. “Genesis.” In The JPS Torah commentary, vol. 1. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1989.

Schneider, Wolfgang C. “The 'Cherub entry' in the 'Temple of Light' – The staging of the spiritual identity of the Christian emperor in the late Antiquity.” Zeitschrift fur Antikes Christentum – Journal Of AncientChristianity 10.2 (2006): 336-357.

Saint Gregory the Great. Omilii la Profetul Iezechiel [Homilies on the Book of the Prophet Ezekiel]. Translated by Elena Sima and Ileana Ingrid Bauer (Iași: Doxologia, 2014.

Saint John Chrysostom. Omilii la Facere [Homilies on Genesis]. In Părinți și scriitori bisericești 21 [Church Fathers and Writers 21]. Translated by Dumitru Fecioru. Bucharest: IBMO, 1987.

Saint Nicholas Cabasilas. Cuvântări teologice: la Iezechiel — Hristos — Fecioara Maria. Scrieri I [Theological Discourses: on Ezekiel — Christ — Virgin Mary]. Translated by Ioan Ică jr. Sibiu: Deisis, 2010.

Shalom, Paul. “Cherub.”In Fred Skolnik et al. (eds.). Encyclopaedia judaica. Vol. 4. Farmington Hills: Keter Publishing House, 2007.

Skinner, J. The Book of the Prophet Isaiah, Chapters I.-XXXIX. With Introduction and Notes. Cambridge: University Press, 1897.

Stevenson, K. and M. Gluerup, “Ezekiel, Daniel.” In Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture OT. Vol. 13. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2008.

Trinquet, J. “Kerub, Kerubim.” DBS 5 (1957): 161-186.

Westermann, Claus. Genesis 1-11. In A Continental Commentary. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1994.

Wood, Alice. Of Wings and Wheels. A Synthetic Study of the Biblical Cherubim. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30

How to Cite

PAȘCA-TUȘA, S. ., & POPA-BOTA, I. . (2019). THE BYZANTINE ICONIC REPRESENTATION OF THE CHERUBIM: SCRIPTURAL REFERENCE POINTS. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Theologia Orthodoxa, 64(1), 5 –. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbto.2019.1.01

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)