GOOD FEDERATION, CONFEDERATION, BAD FEDERATION: WHY THE AMERICAN CONTROVERSY ON THE FEDERAL UNION SHOULD BE A LESSON FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2017.1.04Keywords:
federalism, confederation, US Constitution, federalists, anti-federalists, states, centralized government, devolution.Abstract
Good Federation, Confederation, Bad Federation: Why the American Controversy on the Federal Union Should Be a Lesson for the European Union. The aim of this paper is that of revisiting the competing doctrines of federalism in the United States, as they are exemplarily prescriptive about the means and finality of the correspondent process of European integration. Considering the three main glosses on the federal idea in the United States as the Anti-federalist idea, the Confederative experiment and the Federalist focus on strong and centralized government, the present paper will substantively argue for the (in)consistencies of these models and acknowledge the limits of American federal experiences in the uncertain context of the European controversies on the topic.
REZUMAT. Federalismul bun, confederația, federalismul rău: de ce controversele americane privind uniunea federală ar trebui să constituie o lecție pentru Uniunea Europeană. Scopul acestui articol este de a recapitula doctrinele conflictuale ale federalismului american, întrucât ele sunt în mod exemplar prescriptive în privința mijloacelor și scopului procesului integrării europene. Având în vedere cele trei mari accente ale ideii federale în Statele Unite, respectiv, ideea antifederală, modelul experimental confederativ și abordarea federalismului privind ideea unui guvernământ puternic și centralizat, prezentul articol va argumenta pentru (in)consistențele acestor modele și va da seama de limitele experiențelor federale americane în contextul incert al controverselor europene în domeniu.
Cuvinte cheie: federalism, confederație, Constituția americană, federaliști, antifederaliști, state, guvernământ centralizat, devoluție.
References
Boorstin, Daniel J. The Lost World of Thomas Jefferson. New York: Henry Holt, 1948.
Cain, Bruce E., and Jones, W. T. “Madison’s Theory of Representation.” The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism, edited by Bernard Grofman and Donald Wittman. New York: Agathon Press, 1989, pp. 11-30.
Conlan, Timothy. From New Federalism to Devolution. Washington DC: Brookings Institution, 1998.
Cunningham Jr., Noble E. The Life of Thomas Jefferson. New York: Ballantine Books, 1987.
Dosenrode, Søren. “Federalism.” Approaching the EUropean Federation?, edited by Søren Dosenrode. Burlington: Ashgate, 2007, pp. 7-35.
Dosenrode, Søren. “The EUropean Federation.”Approaching the EUropean Federation?, edited by in Søren Dosenrode. Burlington: Ashgate, 2007, pp. 185-210.
Erk, Jan. Explaining Federalism. State, Society and Congruence in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany and Switzerland. London: Routledge, 2008.
Filippov, Mikhail; Ordeshook, Peter C. and Shvetsova, Olga. Designing Federalism. A Theory of Self-sustaining Federal Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Fink, Evelyn C. and Riker, William H. “The Strategy of Ratification.” The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism, edited by Bernard Grofman and Donald Wittman. New York: Agathon Press, 1989, pp. 220-255.
Gerston, Larry N. American Federalism. A Concise Introduction. New York: M. E. Sharpe, 2007.
Grofman, Bernard. “The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism: An Overview.” The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism, edited by Bernard Grofman and Donald Wittman. New York: Agathon Press, 1989, pp. 1-5.
Hague, Euan, Edward H. Sebesta, and Beirich, Heidi. “Introduction: The Neo-Confederacy and the New Dixie Manifesto.” Neo-Confederacy. A Critical Introduction, edited by Euan Hague, Edward H. Sebesta and Heidi Beirich. Austin: The University of Texas Press, 2008, pp. 1-19.
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and Jay, John. The Federalist Papers. Edited with an Introduction and Notes by Lawrence Goldman. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Hill, Michael and Fleming, Thomas. “New Dixie Manifesto.” Washington Post, October 29, 1995, pp. 35-36.
Hofstadter, Richard. The American Political Tradition. New York: Vintage Books, 1948.
Kavalski, Emilian and Zolkos, Magdalena. “Approaching the Phenomenon of Federal Failure.” Defunct Federalisms. Critical Perspectives on Federal Failure, edited by Emilian Kavalski and Magdalena Zolkos. Burlington: Ashgate, 2008, pp. 1-16.
Kelemen, Daniel R. The Rules of Federalism. Institutions and Regulatory Policies in the EU and Beyond. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 2004.
Kincaid, John. “Three Faces of Contemporary American Federalism.” The Federal Nation. Perspectives on American Federalism, edited by Iwan M. Morgan and Philip J. Davies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008, pp. 63-81.
Kymlicka, Will. “Is Federalism a Viable Alternative to Secession?.” Theories of Secession, edited by Percy B. Lehning. London: Routledge, 1998, pp. 109-148.
Lähteenmäki-Smith, Kaisa. “The Regions in the New Europe.” Approaching the EUropean Federation?, edited by Søren Dosenrode. Burlington: Ashgate, 2007, pp. 139-164.
Laski, Harold. “The Obsolescence of Federalism.” New Republic, 3, 1939, pp. 367-369.
Lipset, Seymour M. The First New Nation. New York: Basic Books, 1963.
Lipson, Leslie. The Democratic Civilisation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1964.
Lowi, Theodore. “Eurofederalism: What Can European Union Learn from United States?”. Comparative Federalism: The European Union and the United States in Comparative Perspective, edited by Anand Menon and Martin Schain. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 93-117.
Majone, Giandomenico. “Federation, Confederation and Mixed Government: A EU-US Comparison.” Comparative Federalism: The European Union and the United States in Comparative Perspective, edited by Anand Menon and Martin Schain. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 121-148.
McGarity, Thomas O. Reinventing Rationality. The Role of Regulatory Analysis in the Federal Bureaucracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
McGuire, Robert A. and Ohsfeldt, Robert L. “Public Choice Analysis and the Ratification of the Constitution.” The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism, edited by Bernard Grofman and Donald Wittman. New York: Agathon Press, 1989, pp. 175-204.
Nagel, Robert F. The Implosion of American Federalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Peacock, Anthony A. How To Read the Federalist Papers. Washington: The Heritage Foundation, 2010.
Rakove, Jack N. Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York: Vintage Books, 1997.
Richter, Melvin. The Political Theory of Montesquieu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
Riker, William H. Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little Brown, 1964.
Rodden, Jonathan A. Hamilton’s Paradox. The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Sbragia, Alberta. “The United States and the European Union: Comparing Two Sui Generis Systems.” Comparative Federalism: The European Union and the United States in Comparative Perspective, edited by Anand Menon and Martin Schain. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 15-34.
Storing, Herbert J. What the Anti-Federalists Were For. The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1981.
Wachendorfer-Schmidt, Ute. “Introduction”, Federalism and Political Performance, edited by Ute Wachendorfer-Schmidt. London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 1-19.
Wheare, Kenneth C. Federal Government, 4th edition. London: Oxford University Press, 1980.
Zimmerman, Joseph F. Contemporary American Federalism. The Growth of National Power, 2nd edition. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
©Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Philologia. Published by Babeș-Bolyai University.