“I’VE READ YOU RIGHT- I’M WITH YOU NOW”: AESTHETIC READING IN VIRGINIA WOOLF'S METAFICTIONAL SHORT STORIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2024.3.05

Keywords:

Virginia Woolf, metafiction, aesthetic reading, short story, reader-response criticism, Louise Rosenblatt

Abstract

“I’ve read you right—I’m with you now”: Aesthetic Reading in Virginia Woolf’s Metafictional Short Stories. Despite critical interest in Virginia Woolf’s intense preoccupation with the imaginative process at the root of literary creation, little attention has been paid to the manner in which, through metafiction, the writer turns her short stories into reflections upon the nature of reading. In works such as “An Unwritten Novel” (1921) and “The Lady in the Looking-Glass. A Reflection” (1926), the boundaries between literature and criticism, between fiction and reality, take center stage and it is precisely this point of convergence that metafictional works take as subject matter. Thus, Virginia Woolf’s ‘character-reading’ makes its way into her stories and the author’s critical stance upon the act of reading, revealed primarily in her essays, is now transmitted thematically through characters who appropriate the readers’ active construction of meaning while living in the same textual world inhabited by the fictitious characters they ardently wish to interpret. Through the advancement of a specific type of reading: active, emotive, empathetic, fluid, inquisitive, intimate and indeterminate, yet always close to the text it is engaged with, Virginia Woolf may be said to prefigure the type of transactional reader-response criticism underpinned by Louise Rosenblatt, whose insistence upon aesthetic reading calls for a two-way transmission of meaning that is simultaneously constitutive of the literary work and of the reader’s self.

„Te-am citit bine—sunt cu tine acum”: lectură estetică în povestirile metaficționale ale Virginiei Woolf. În ciuda interesului critic față de preocuparea intensă a Virginiei Woolf pentru procesul imaginativ care stă la baza creației literare, s-a acordat puțină atenție modului în care, prin metaficțiune, scriitoarea își transformă povestirile în reflecții asupra naturii lecturii. În opere precum „Un roman nescris” (1921) și „Doamna din oglindă”. O reflecție” (1926), în centrul atenției se află granițele dintre literatură și critică, dintre ficțiune și realitate. Pentru Mark Currie, tocmai acest punct de convergență este subiectul abordat în operele metaficționale. Astfel, ceea ce Virginia Woolf numește „citirea personajului” își face loc în povestirile sale, iar poziția critică a autoarei asupra actului lecturii, dezvăluită în primul rând în eseurile sale, este transmisă tematic prin personaje care își însușesc construcția activă a cititorilor în timp ce trăiesc în aceeași lume textuală populată de personajele fictive pe care doresc cu ardoare să le interpreteze. Prin avansarea unui anumit tip de lectură: activă, emotivă, empatică, fluidă, curioasă, intimă și nedeterminată, dar întotdeauna apropiată de textul-bază, se poate spune că Virginia Woolf prefigurează tipul de critică tranzacțională a cititorului susținută de Louise Rosenblatt, a cărei insistență asupra lecturii estetice încurajează o transmitere bidirecțională a sensului, în același timp constitutivă operei literare și sinelui cititorului.

 Cuvinte-cheie: Virginia Woolf, metaficțiune, lectură estetică, povestire, critica cititorului, Louise Rosenblatt

 Article history: Received 1 March 2024; Revised 27 June 2024; Accepted 01 September 2024; Available online 30 September 2024; Available print 30 September 2024.

References

Abeshaus, Michelle. 1991. Gaps in Meaning. Reading Virginia Woolf For What Isn’t There. Thesis. Texas Tech University.

Baldwin, Dean R. 1989. Virginia Woolf. A Study of the Short Fiction. Boston: Twayne Publishers.

Barthes, Roland. 1975. The Pleasure of the Text. Translated by Richard Miller. New York: Hill and Wang.

Benzel, Kathryn N. and Ruth Hoberman. 2004. Trespassing Boundaries. Virginia Woolf's Short Fiction. London, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cuddy-Keane, Melba. 2003. Virginia Woolf, the Intellectual, and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Currie, Mark. 2013. “Introduction.” In Metafiction, edited by Mark Currie. London, New York: Routledge.

D’hoker, Elke. 2008. “The Role of the Imagination in Virginia Woolf’s Short Fiction.” Journal of the Short Story in English, no. 50 (Spring): 1-11.

Ferebee, Steve. 1987. “Bridging the Gulf: The Reader In and Out of Virginia Woolf’s Literary Essays.” CLA Journal 30, no. 3 (March): 343-361.

Flint, Kate. 1996. “Reading Uncommonly: Virginia Woolf and the Practice of Reading.” The Yearbook of English Studies, no. 26: 187-198.

Goldman, Jane. 2006. The Cambridge Introduction to Virginia Woolf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hashimoto, Megumi. 1984. “Virginia Woolf’s Theory of Reception.” In Phenomenology of Life in a Dialogue Between Chinese and Occidental Philosophy, edited by Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel Publishing Company.

Högberg, Elsa. 2020. Virginia Woolf and the Ethics of Intimacy. London, New York, Bloomsbury Academic.

Hühn, Peter. 2010. Eventfulness in British Fiction. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.

Lacan, Jacques. 2006. Ecrits. The First Complete Edition in English. Translated by Bruce Fink. New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company.

Lojo Rodriguez, Laura Maria. 2001. “Parody and metafiction: Virginia Woolf’s ‘An Unwritten Novel’.” Links & Letters, no. 8: 71-81.

Popa, Nicolae. 2016. “Virginia Woolf’s Essays on Reading.” East-West Cultural Passage. Journal of the Research Center for Cross-Cultural Studies 16, no. 2 (December): 152-159.

Prudente, Teressa. 2008. “‘To Slip Easily From One Thing to Another’: Experimentalism And Perception in Woolf’s Short Stories.” Journal of the Short Story in English, no. 50 (Spring): 1-5.

Reynier, Christine. 2009. Virginia Woolf's Ethics of the Short Story. London, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Richter, Harvena. 1970. Virginia Woolf: The Inward Voyage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rosenblatt, Louise. 1938. Literature as Exploration. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.

Rosenblatt, Louise. 1978. The Reader, the Text, the Poem. The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. 1994. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Ronseblatt, Louise. 1993. “The Transactional Theory: Against Dualisms.” College English 55, no. 4 (April): 377-386.

Séllei, Nóra. 1997. “The Snail and ‘The Times’: Three Stories ‘Dancing in Unity’.” Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies 3, no. 2: 189-198.

Skrbic, Nena. 2004. Wild Outbursts of Freedom. Reading Virginia Woolf's Short Fiction. London: Praeger.

Tompkins, Jane P. 1980. Reader-Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Woolf, Virginia. 2014. Complete Works of Virginia Woolf. Hastings, East Sussex: Delphi Classics.

Woolf, Virginia. 1921. “An Unwritten Novel.” In Monday or Tuesday. Eight Stories. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications. 15-21.

Woolf, Virginia. 1924. Mr. Bennet and Mrs. Brown. London: The Hogarth Press.

Woolf, Virginia. 2009. “The Lady in the Looking-Glass. A Reflection.” In A Haunted House and Other Short Stories. Adelaide: University of Adelaide.

Woolf, Virginia. 1921. “The Mark on the Wall.” Monday or Tuesday. Eight Stories. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications. 31-35

Woolf, Virginia. 1979. “The Reader.” ‘Anon’ and ‘The Reader’. In Virginia Woolf’s Last Essays, edited by Brenda R. Silver. Twentieth Century Literature 25.e/4 (Autumn - Winter): 356-441.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

PARIS-POPA, A. (2024). “I’VE READ YOU RIGHT- I’M WITH YOU NOW”: AESTHETIC READING IN VIRGINIA WOOLF’S METAFICTIONAL SHORT STORIES. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia, 69(3), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2024.3.05

Issue

Section

Articles