GENERATIONS, CONTEMPORANEITY, AND INTERSECTIONALITY IN LITERARY HISTORY

Authors

  • Andreea MIRONESCU Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași. Email: andreea.mironescu@uaic.ro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2022.3.16

Keywords:

generation, generationality, literary history, postcommunism, intersectionality

Abstract

Generations, Contemporaneity, and Intersectionality in Literary History. While several traditional concepts of literary history, including literary periods, periodization itself, and genre, have been recently put into question and reframed in transnational, cross-temporal, and transdisciplinary ways, the notion of generation has received much less attention. At the same time, in various branches of cultural studies, and even more prominently in sociology, the problem of generations has taken center stage once again. In this article, the critic takes as her departure point Mihai Iovănel’s 2021 History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020 to discuss how the generational operator could be employed in post-Cold War literary history. Mironescu argues that a transversal and intersectional integration of generation into contemporary literary criticism could ensure a better understanding of intra- and transgenerational dynamics in terms of self-representations and group narratives, inclusions and exclusions, as well as gender and literary affiliations.

Article history: Received 27 February 2022; Revised 28 July 2022; Accepted 31 August 2022; Available online 20 September 2022; Available print 30 September 2022.

REZUMAT. Generații, contemporaneitate și intersecționalitate în istoria literară. Dacă diverse concepte tradiționale ale istoriei literare, precum perioadele literare (și conceptul însuși de periodizare) sau genurile literare au fost, în ultima vreme, chestionate critic și regândite în contexte transnaționale, cross-temporale și transdisciplinare, noțiunea de generație a primit mult mai puțină atenție din partea criticilor. În același timp, în diferite subdomenii ale studiilor culturale, și, mai pregnant, în sociologie, problema generațiilor a recâștigat o nouă actualitate. În acest articol Mironescu ia ca punct de plecare Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 (2021), pentru a discuta cum operatorul generațional poate fi utilizat în istoria literară de după sfârșitul Războiului Rece. Ea susține că o integrare transversală și intersecțională a noțiunii de generație în critica literară contemporană poate duce la o mai corectă înțelegere a dinamicii intra- și transgeneraționale în ceea ce privește autoreprezentările și narațiunile de grup, includerile și excluderile, afilierile literare sau de gen.

 Cuvinte-cheie: generație, generaționalitate, istorie literară, postcomunism, intersecționalitate

 

Author Biography

Andreea MIRONESCU, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași. Email: andreea.mironescu@uaic.ro

Andreea MIRONESCU is Senior Researcher at the Institute of Interdisciplinary Research – Department of Social Sciences and Humanities of Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași. Her scholarly interests cover Romanian modernism, literary history, and memory and postmemory studies with emphasis of Communism. Email: andreea.mironescu@uaic.ro

References

Artwińska, Anna, Agniezska Mrozik (eds.). 2020. “Generational and Gendered Memory of Communism in Central and Eastern Europe: Methodological Perspectives and Political Challenges.” In Gender, Generations and Communism in Central and Eastern Europe and Beyond, edited by Anna Artwińska and Agniezska Mrozik, 9-28. New York: Routledge.

Borza, Cosmin. 2021. “Canonul Occidental din Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020 de Mihai Iovănel.” Transilvania 7-8, 123-127.

Erll, Astrid. 2014. “Generation in Literary History: Three Constellations of Generationality, Genealogy, and Memory.” New Literary History, 45 (3), 385-409.

Cărtărescu, Mircea. 1999. Postmodernismul românesc. București: Humanitas.

Cornis-Pope, Marcel, and John Neubauer. 2010. History of the literary cultures of East-Central Europe. Vol. 4. Types and stereotypes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Crăciun, Gheorghe (ed.). 1999. Competiția continuă. Generația 80 în texte teoretice. Pitești: Paralela 45.

Hayot, Eric. 2011. “Against Periodozation; or, On Instititutional Time.” New Literary History, 42 (4), Autumn, 739-756.

Hanna, Julian. 2016. “Generation.” In Literature Now. Key Terms and Methods for Literary History, edited by Sascha Bru, Ben de Bruyn and Michel Delville, 178-190. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Hentea, Marius. 2013. “The Problem of Literary Generations: Origins and Limitations.” Comparative Literature Studies, 50 (4), 567-588.

Hirsch, Marianne. 2012. The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture after the Holocaust. New York, Columbia University Press.

Iovănel, Mihai. 2021. Istoria literaturii române contemporane: 1990-2020. Iași: Polirom.

Iovănel, Mihai, and Christian Moraru. 2019. “Corectitudinea politică între realitate și fetiș.” Euphorion, 4, https://revista-euphorion.ro/corectitudinea-politica-intre-realitate-si-fetis/ (Accessed 1 August 2022).

Lenart-Cheng, Helga, and Ioana Luca. 2018. “Memories in Dialogue: Transnational Stories About Socialist Childhoods.” In Childhood and Schooling in (post) Socialist Societies. Memories of Everyday Life, edited by Iveta Silova, Nelli Piatoeva, Zsuzsa Millei, 19-40. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Macrea-Toma, Ioana. 2009. Privilighenția. Instituții literare în comunismul românesc. Cluj Napoca: Casa Cărții de Știință.

Manolescu, Nicolae. 2008. Istoria critică a literaturii române: 5 secole de literatură. Pitești: Paralela 45.

Manolescu, Nicolae. 2022. “Trei generații de critici literari” (Editorial). România literară, 18-19. https://romanialiterara.com/2022/05/trei-generatii-de-critici-literari/ (Accessed 1 August 2022).

Mannheim, Karl. 1972. “The Problem of Generations.” In Karl Mannheim, Essays, edited by Paul Kecskemeti, 276-322. London: Routledge, 1972.

Mironescu, Andreea, and Doris Mironescu. 2019. “Premises for a History of Romanian Literature for a Trans-disciplinary Perspective.” Hermeneia: Journal of Hermeneutics, Art Theory and Criticism, 23, 73-84.

Modreanu, Cristina. 2020. The History of Romanian Theatre from Communism to Capitalism: Children of a Restless Time. New York: Routledge.

Moraru, Christian. 2021. “Literary Historiography as Event: Mihai Iovănel’s History of Contemporary Romanian Literature: 1990-2020.” Transilvania, 7-8, 1-13.

Negrici, Eugen. 2019. Literatura română sub comunism. Ediția a III-a. Iași: Polirom.

Segel, Harold B. 2008. The Columbia Literary History of Eastern Europe since 1945. New York: Columbia University Press.

Stanford Friedman, Susan. 2019. “Alternatives to Periodization: Literary History, Modernism, and the ‘New’ Temporalities.” MLQ 80, no. 4 (December 2019): 379-402.

Suleiman, Susan Robin. 2002. “The 1.5 Generation. Thinking about Child Survivors and the Holocaust.” American Imago, 59 (3), 277-295.

Turner, Brian S. 2002. “Strategic Generations: Historical Change, Literary Expression, and Generational Politics.” In Generational Consciousness, Narrative, and Politics, edited by June Edmunds and Bryan S. Turner, 41-85. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

Yurchak, Alexei. 2005. Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Zin, Mnemo, and Susanne Gannon. 2022. “Scenes from a Collective Biography of Cold War Childhoods: A Decolonial Ethodrama.” Cultural Studies–Critical Methodologies, 22 (3), 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086211068194

Downloads

Published

2022-09-20

How to Cite

MIRONESCU, A. (2022). GENERATIONS, CONTEMPORANEITY, AND INTERSECTIONALITY IN LITERARY HISTORY. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia, 67(3), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2022.3.16

Issue

Section

Articles