LEFTIST CRITIQUE OR FIGHT FOR DEMOCRACY? ‟CONTIMPORANUL” COVERING THE TRIAL FROM DEALUL SPIRII

Authors

  • Emilia FAUR PhD candidate, Doctoral School of Philosophy, Faculty of History and Philosophy, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: emilia_faur02@yahoo.com. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3989-7922

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2019.spiss.05

Keywords:

Contimporanul, “The Trial of Dealul Spirii”, Romanian Socialist Party, Romanian National Liberal Party, democracy

Abstract

Leftist Critique or Fight for Democracy? Contimporanul Covering the Trial from Dealul Spirii. The general knowledge about the political dimension of the Romanian historical avant-garde places the groups on the left of the political spectrum. However, there is little work on what this means precisely when it comes to the concrete historical situations. It may well be that Contimporanul, the main press organ of the avant-garde supported a political agenda of socialist origin, but what does it mean specifically? In order to give a complete historical-intellectual picture of the Romanian avant-garde, specifically of Contimporanul, one must also account for the first couple of years of its appearance, when it published a large number of political opinion articles, written mainly by the same authors that would become central for the artistic movement as well. We aim to fill this gap in the scholar writings by giving a detailed account of the reactions found in the pages of Contimporanul related to the political events of that time, notably those that involved the socialist movement. The case in point is the Trial of Dealul Spirii and the alleged political assassinations against socialist leaders committed or condoned by the state authorities. The overall image of the political ideology of Contimporanul from those years shows rather a marked democratic attitude towards the events, and a great deal of journalistic objectivity behind the attacks against the liberal establishment.

References

Aladin [Vinea, Ion], „Avocaţii generalului Popovici” [„The lawyers of General Popovici”], Contimporanul, Year I, No. 7, July 15 1922, p. 3.

Aladin [Vinea, Ion], „Comedia declasaţilor” [„The comedy of the morally discredited”], Contimporanul, Year I, No. 5, Iuly 1 1922, p. 7.

Bobeş, T., „Asasinatul politic considerat ca omagiu” [„The political assassination as homage”], Contimporanul, Year I, No. 6, July 8 1922, pp. 3‒4.

Branişte, Andrei, „În jurul câtorva fapte diverse” [„About some various facts”], Contimporanul, Year I, No. 1, June 3 1922, p. 2.

Cernat, Paul, Avangarda românească și complexul periferiei [The Romanian avant-garde and the complex of periphery], Ed. Cartea Românească, București, 2007.

Cernat, Paul, Contimporanul. Istoria unei reviste de avangardă [Contimporanul. The history of a Romanian avant-garde magazine], Ed. Institutul Cultural Român, București, 2007.

Cioroianu, Adrian, Pe umerii lui Marx. O introducere în istoria comunismului românesc [On Marx’s shoulders. An introduction to the history of the Romanian communism], The Second Edition, Curtea Veche, Bucureşti, 2007.

Gulea, Dan, Domni, tovarăși, camarazi. O evoluție a avangardei române [Gentlemen, comrades, companions. An evolution of the Romanian avant-garde], Editura Paralela 45, 2007.

Iova [Vinea, Ion], „Popovici asasinul” [„Popovici, the assasin”], Contimporanul, Year I, No. 5, July 1 1922, p. 9.

Mincu, Marin, Avangarda literară românească, Volumul I. De la Urmuz la Eugen Ionescu și Volumul II: De la Gellu Naum la Paul Celan [The Romanian literary avant-garde. Volume I. From Urmuz to Eugen Ionescu and Volume II. From Gellu Naum to Paul Cernat], Ed.Minerva, București, 1999.

Neacşu, Gheorghe; Scurtu, Ioan, Leonte Filipescu, Editura Politică, Bucureşti, 1973, p. 34.

Nesemnat [without author], „Povestea Vorbei” [„The Tale of the Talk”], Contimporanul, Year I, No. 1, June 3 1922, p. 16.

P. V. F., „Pvoestea vorbei” [„The Tale of the Talk”], Contimporanul, Year I, No. 2, June 10 1922, p. 15.

Pop, Ion, „Din avangardă în ariergardă (I)” [„From avant-garde to rearguard”], Tribuna, anul IX, No. 179, 16 – 28 February 2010.

Pop, Ion, Avangarda în literatura română [The avant-garde in the Romanian literature], Ed. Atlas, Bucureşti, 2000.

Streitman, H. St., „Revizuiri” [„Revisions”], Contimporanul, Year I, No. 4, June 24 1922, p. 12.

Tănase, Stelian, Clienţii lu’ Tanti Varvara [Mam’s Varvara clients], The Second Edition, Humanitas, Bucureşti, 2008.

Theodorescu, Dem., „Recunoştinţa unui amnistiat” [„The gratitude of an amnestied”], Contimporanul, Year I, No. 2, June 10 1922, p. 7.

Theodorescu, Dem., „Ruşinea de a fi român” [“The shame of being a Romanian”], Contimporanul, Year I, No. 1, June 3 1922, p. 4.

V. [Vinea, Ion], „Amnistia” [„The Amnesty”], in Contimporanul, Year I, No. 1, June 3 1922, p. 7.

Vinea, I. [Vinea, Ion], „Sabia şi vremile” [“The swords and the times”], Contimporanul, Year I, No. 10, August 19 1922, p. 2.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-30

How to Cite

FAUR, E. (2019). LEFTIST CRITIQUE OR FIGHT FOR DEMOCRACY? ‟CONTIMPORANUL” COVERING THE TRIAL FROM DEALUL SPIRII. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia, 64(Special Issue), 69 –. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2019.spiss.05