EXPLORING THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROCEDURAL KNOWLEDGE AND RELATED COMPETENCIES THROUGH STUDY OF BIOLOGY IN MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOLS IN ROMANIA

Authors

  • Miriam KENYERES Doctoral School of Education, Reflection, Development, Department of Education Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. miriam.kenyeres@ubbcluj.ro
  • Ion ALBULESCU rofessor, PhD, Department of Education Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. ion.albulescu@ubbcluj.ro https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7284-805X
  • Irina POP-PĂCURAR Associate Professor, PhD, Department of Science Teacher Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. irina.pop-pacurar@ubbcluj.ro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbpsyped.2022.2.06

Keywords:

procedural knowledge, competencies, curriculum, Biology syllabus, practical activity, competency-based education, middle school, high school.

Abstract

The current educational paradigm implemented worldwide is the development of competence comprising knowledge, skills, and attitudes. This research aims to investigate the acquisition of procedural knowledge and competencies targeting this type of knowledge through the study of Biology in middle and high schools in Romania. The paper first provides a brief overview of the history and existent usage of the concepts of competence and procedural knowledge. Moreover, it describes the Romanian educational system from a diachronic perspective. Following this, a careful analysis of middle and high school Biology syllabi is conducted. Particularly, development of procedural knowledge and competencies targeting procedural knowledge in these documents is examined critically. The results of this analysis indicate that, even though syllabi mention competence and procedural knowledge, they need more concrete activity guidance and assessment to train them. Finally, an online survey targeting high school ninth-graders and first-year university students is applied and analyzed. The survey assesses the implementation of instruction based on procedural knowledge. The results reveal the need for more logistics (laboratories and instruments) provision in schools and for carrying out practical activities. A need for reconsidering Biology syllabi, educational investment, and teacher preparation is necessary to succeed in developing procedural knowledge and competencies associated with this, through the study of Biology.

References

Apateanu, D. (2009). The educational policy in Romania. Available at SSRN 2562872.

Ardelean, A., & Mândruţ, O. (2012). Competencies training didactics. “Vasile Goldiş” University Press, p. 11, 15. (Didactica formării competenţelor).

Bîrzan, N. (2010). Implementation guide of the modernized curriculum for the high school level. Biology, Chişinău, Publishing house Cartier, p. 106 (Ghid de implementare a curriculumului modernizat pentru treapta liceală. Biologie).

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Cognitive domain.

Bocoș, M.D. (2017). Didactics of Pedagogical Disciplines: A Constructivist Framework, 4th Edition. Publishing house Paralela 45, p. 72-73, 75. (Didactica disciplinelor pedagogice: un cadru constructivist, Ediția a 4-a).

Cheetham, G. & Chivers, G. (1996) Towards a holistic model of professional competence. Journal of European Industrial Training, 20(5), 20-30.

Cheetham, G. & Chivers, G. (1998) The reflective (and competent) practitioner: a model of professional competence which seeks to harmonise the reflective practitioner and competence-based approaches. Journal of European Industrial Training, 22(7), 267 – 276.

Ciobanu, M. (2008). Didactics of biological sciences. Publishing house: Editura Didactică și Pedagogică, București, p. 9-28 (Didactica științelor biologice).

Ciolan, L., Iftimescu, S., & Stingu, M. (2021). The institutional conditions of adapting to future challenges in the Romanian education system, CEU Center for Policy Studies.

Connor, G. S. (2003). The reform of education in Romania and its implications for the teaching of geography in secondary schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia).

Council Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong - 2018/C 189/01, Annex 1, p. 7

De Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational psychologist, 31(2), 105-113.

Eurostat data, retrieved online on 20th of November 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/gov_10a_exp/default/bar?lang=en

Gelman, R.; Greeno, J.G. (1989). On the nature of competence. Principles for understanding in a domain. In Resnick, L.B. (ed.). Knowing, learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, p. 125-186.

Greeno, J.G.; Riley, M.S.; Gelman, R. (1984). Conceptual competence and children’s counting. Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 16, p. 94-143.

Grosseck, G., Holotescu, C., & Andone, D. (2020). Open educational resources in Romania. In Current State of Open Educational Resources in the “Belt and Road” Countries, Springer, Singapore p. 151-173.

Kitchen, H., Fordham, E., Henderson, K., Looney, A., & Maghnouj, S. (2017). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education Romania. OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education. OECD Publishing.

Klieme, E., & Leutner, D. (2006). Competence models for the assessment of individual learning outcomes and review of educational processes. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52(6), p. 876–903. (Kompetenzmodelle zur Erfassung individueller Lernergebnisse und zur Bilanzierung von Bildungsprozessen: Beschreibung eines neu eingerichteten Schwerpunktprogramms der DFG).

Linn, R. R., & Harlow, F. H. (1997). FIRETEC: a transport description of wildfire behavior (No. LA-UR-97-3920; CONF-980121-). Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States).

Mager, R. F. (1984). Preparing Instructional Objectives (2nd edn), Pitman Learning Inc.

Mândruț, O., Catană, L., & Mândruț, M. (2012). Training centered on Research-Innovation-Training-Development competencies. Universitatea De Vest „Vasile Goldiş” Arad, Centrul de Didactică și Educație Permanentă, 31 Păunescu, p. 13. (Instruirea centrată pe competenţe Cercetare-Inovare–Formare–Dezvoltare).

Marga, A. (2002). Reform of Education in Romania in the 1990s: A Retrospective. Higher Education in Europe, 27(1-2), 123-135.

Marinescu, M. (2018). Didactics of biology. Theory and applications. Publishing house: Paralela 45, p.21. (Didactica biologiei. Teorie și aplicații).

Ministry of Education, (2004). Biology curriculum for ninth grade (high school).

Ministry of Education, (2004). Biology curriculum for tenth grade (high school).

Ministry of Education, (2006). Biology curriculum for eleventh grade (high school).

Ministry of Education, (2006). Biology curriculum for twelfth grade (high school).

Ministry of Education, (2017). Biology curriculum for middle school.

OJEU - Official Journal of the European Union (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning (2006/962/EC).

Okun, M. A., & Sasfy, J. H. (1977). Adolescence, the self-concept, and formal operations. Adolescence, 12(47), 373.

Piaget, J. (1983). Piaget’s theory. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, volume 1. New York: Wiley.

Rogers, A. P. (2021). Exploring secondary teachers’ perspectives on implementing competency‐based education. The Journal of Competency‐Based Education, 6(4), 222-232.

Romanian National Education Law, 2011, retrieved on 19th of November, 2022 https://edu.ro/sites/default/files/_fi%C8%99iere/Legislatie/2022/LEN_2011_actualizata_2022.pdf

Șăitan, T., Olteanu, S., Afrim, C., Tanur, I, Miricel, F., Manea, C., Neagu, A., Divoiu, M., & Mihai, A. (2017). Training guide for Biology teachers. Tenure, Definitive. Publishing house: Didactica Publishing House, p. 311. (Ghid de pregătire pentru profesorii de Biologie. Titularizare, Definitivat).

Saks, K., Ilves, H., & Noppel, A. (2021). The impact of procedural knowledge on the formation of declarative knowledge: How accomplishing activities designed for developing learning skills impacts teachers’ knowledge of learning skills. Education Sciences, 11(10), 598.

Sophian, S. (1997). Beyond competence: the significance of performance for conceptual development. Cognitive Development, Vol. 12, p. 281-303.

Spellings, M. (2005). Helping your child through early adolescence. Washington DC: US Department of Education

Ten Berge, T., & Van Hezewijk, R. (1999). Procedural and declarative knowledge: An evolutionary perspective. Theory & Psychology, 9(5), 605-624.

Tomuletiu, E. A., & Moraru, A. (2010). Rural education in Romania: Present and perspectives. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 402-406.

VanScoy, A. (2019). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: A framework for analyzing point-of-need information literacy instruction. Communications in Information Literacy, 13(2), 3.

Voiculescu, F. (2011). Paradigm approach by competences. Material created within

the project POSDRU “Quality, innovation, communication in the system of continuous training of didacticians in higher education”. (Paradigma abordării prin competențe).

Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies, Hogrefe & Huber Publishers. p. 45–65.

Winterton, J., Delamare-Le Deist, F., & Stringfellow, E. (2006). Typology of knowledge, skills and competences: clarification of the concept and prototype. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. p. 13-16.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-05

How to Cite

KENYERES, M., ALBULESCU, I., & POP-PĂCURAR, I. (2022). EXPLORING THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROCEDURAL KNOWLEDGE AND RELATED COMPETENCIES THROUGH STUDY OF BIOLOGY IN MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOLS IN ROMANIA. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Psychologia-Paedagogia, 67(2), 107–138. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbpsyped.2022.2.06

Issue

Section

Articles