IS THERE ANY FORESTRY EDUCATION IN ROMANIA? GEOGRAPHY TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS, ATTITUDES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Authors

  • Maria Eliza DULAMĂ Faculty of Psychology and Sciences of Education, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Email: dulama@upcmail.ro
  • Oana-Ramona ILOVAN Faculty of Geography, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Email: ilovanoana@yahoo.com https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2075-1808
  • Ioana MAGDAŞ Faculty of Psychology and Sciences of Education, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Email: magdas_ioana@yahoo.com
  • Bianca Sorina RĂCĂŞAN Faculty of Geography, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: bianca_racasan@yahoo.com https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-4829

Keywords:

forest protection, forestry learning, forestry curriculum, education for forest sustainable development, forest sustainable management.

Abstract

The problem our study found a solution for was the lack of efficient forestry education in Romania. In this context, studies argued that many of the citizens’ attitudes towards forests formed during teachers’ organized activities. Because the efficiency of those activities for forestry education depended on the school curriculum and on the Geography teachers’ training, beliefs, and attitudes, in our research, by administering a questionnaire to 208 Geography teachers, we wanted to identify: their perceptions of the impact certain factors had, of certain activities efficiency and of certain components in the Geography school curricula; the approach of forest topics in official documents; teachers’ involvement of their students in diverse activities; their opinions on forest topics that should have been included in the official curriculum. For forestry education in Romania, they perceived school and family as having the biggest impact, and the activities in the forests as the most efficient ones. Research showed that Romanian Geography teachers participated frequently at actions that focused on forestry education. They perceived as weak and very weak the approach of forest topics and their protection in diverse official education documents, and because of this they recommended improvement, suggesting relevant themes, in compliance with the forestry literature.

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG. Das Problem für welches unsere Studie eine Lösung gefunden hat, war der Mangel an effizienter Wald- und Forstwirtschaftsbildung in Rumänien. In diesem Zusammenhang argumentieren Studien, dass viele der Einstellungen der Bürger gegenüber Wälder während der organisierten Aktivitäten während der Schulzeit geprägt werden. Da der Wirkungsgrad dieser Tätigkeiten für die schulische Forstwirtschaftsbildung  vom Lehrplan und von der Ausbildung der Geografielehrer, sowie ihrer Überzeugungen und Einstellungen abhängt, haben wir in unserer Forschung eine Umfrage unter 208 Geographielehrer durchgeführt, um folgende Aspekte zu erkennen: ihre Wahrnehmungen bezüglich der Auswirkungen bestimmter Faktoren, der Wirkung gewisser Aktivitäten und Elemente des geographischen Curriculums; die Herangehensweise an Waldthemen in den offiziellen Dokumenten; die Einbindung ihrer Schüler in die vielfältigen Aktivitäten; ihre Meinung zu Waldthemen, die in den offiziellen Lehrplänen aufgenommen werden sollten. Für die Forstwirtschaftsbildung in Rumänien erkannten sie die Schule und die Familie als maßgebend, und die Aktivitäten in den Wäldern als die am effizientesten. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen haben gezeigt, dass die rumänische Geographielehrer häufig an wald- und forstwirtschaftliche Bildungsaktionen teilgenommen haben. Die Herangehensweise an Waldthemen und Waldschutz in verschiedenen offiziellen Bildungsdokumenten betrachteten sie meistens als schwach und sehr schwach, und deshalb haben sie Verbesserung empfohlen, wobei sie bedeutende Themen vorschlugen, im Einklang mit der aktuellen Literatur zur Forstwirtschaft.

Schlüsselwörter: Waldschutz, Wald- und Forstwirtschaft im Lehrplan, Bildung für nachhaltige Forstwirtschaft, nachhaltige Forstwirtschaft

Author Biographies

Maria Eliza DULAMĂ, Faculty of Psychology and Sciences of Education, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Email: dulama@upcmail.ro

Department of Exact Sciences Didactics, Faculty of Psychology and Sciences of Education, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Email: dulama@upcmail.ro

Oana-Ramona ILOVAN, Faculty of Geography, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Email: ilovanoana@yahoo.com

Department of Regional Geography and Territorial Planning, Faculty of Geography, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Email: ilovanoana@yahoo.com

Ioana MAGDAŞ, Faculty of Psychology and Sciences of Education, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Email: magdas_ioana@yahoo.com

Department of Exact Sciences Didactics, Faculty of Psychology and Sciences of Education, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Email: magdas_ioana@yahoo.com

Bianca Sorina RĂCĂŞAN, Faculty of Geography, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: bianca_racasan@yahoo.com

Faculty of Geography, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: bianca_racasan@yahoo.com

References

Arevalo, J., Mola-Yudego, B., Pelkonen, P. & Qu, M. (2012). Students’ views on forestry education: A cross-national comparison across three universities in Brazil, China and Finland. Forest Policy and Economics, 25, 123-131. doi:10.1016/j.forpol. 2012.08.015

Bădescu, G., Sum, P. & Uslaner, E.M. (2004). Civil society development and democratic values in Romania and Moldova. East European Politics and Societies, 18, 316-341.

Batkhuu, N.O., Lee, D.K. & Tsogtbaatar, J. (2011). Forest and forestry research and education in Mongolia. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 30(6), 600-617. doi:10.1080/10549811.2011.548761

Biggs, R., Westley, F. & Carpenter, S. (2010). Navigating the back loop: fostering social innovation and transformation in ecosystem management. Ecology and Society 15(2), article 9.

Cadar, N. (2014). National Forest Office of France and his involvement in environmental education. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology, 18(1), 151-155.

Cheval, D., Cheval, S., Giugăl, A., Pârlog, M.C. & Furtună, C. (2007). Geography. Europe. Romania. The European Union. Text book for the 12th grade. București: All Educational. (In Romanian)

Cruz, R.V.O., Bantayan, R.B., Landicho, L.D. & Bantayan, N.C. (2013). Reformulating agriculture and forestry education in the Philippines: issues and concerns. Journal of Developments in Sustainable Agriculture, 8(1), 49-62. http://doi.org/10.11178/jdsa.8.49

Deleanu, M.I. (2013). Ecological education: proposal of implementation programs in Romania. Earth Common Journal, 3(2), 1-2.

Devey, S., Goussev, V., Schwarzenburg, B. & Althaus, M. (2014). Shale gas U-turns in Bulgaria and Romania: The turbulent politics of energy and protest. Journal of European Management & Public Affairs Studies, 1(2), 47-60.

Dimitru, M. (2014), List of adventure parks in Romania. http://locurifaine.ro/parcuri-de-aventura-din-romania-lista-tuturor-parcurilor/ (accessed on 15 January, 2016). (In Romanian)

Dulamă, M.E., Magdaș, I. & Osaci-Costache, G. (2015). Study on geography students’ internet use, Romanian Review of Geographical Education, 1, 45-61.

Fabra-Crespo, M., Mola-Yudego, B., Gritten, D. & Rojas-Briales, E. (2012). Public perception on forestry issues in the Region of Valencia (Eastern Spain): diverging from policy makers? Forest Systems, 21(1), 99-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/fs/2112211-11309

Fabra-Crespo, M., Saastamoinen, O., Matero, J. & Mäntyranta, H. (2014). Perceptions and realities: public opinion on forests and forestry in Finland, 1993-2012. Silva Fennica 48(5), 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.14214/sf.1140

Giurgiu, V. (2010). On the situation of Romania’s forests. I. Decrease of the forested surface and ignoring afforestation. Revista pădurilor, 83(2), 3-16. (In Romanian)

Giurgiu, V. (2012). For a new forestry legislation. Revista pădurilor, 127(1), 36-42. (In Romanian)

Griffiths, P., Kuemmerle, T., Baumann, M., Radeloff Volker, C., Abrudan, I.V., Lieskovsky, J., Munteanu, C., Ostapowicz, K. & Hostert P. (2014). Forest disturbances, forest recovery, and changes in forest types across the Carpathian ecoregion from 1985 to 2010 based on Landsat, image composites. Remote Sensing of Environment, 151, 72-88.

Groninger, J.W. (2006). Forestry and forestry education in Afghanistan. Journal of Forestry, 104(8), 426-430.

Gruchała, A. & Zasada, M. (2012). Design of forestry education at the Faculty of Forestry, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW. Studia i Materiały CEPL w Rogowie, R. 14. Zeszyt 2 (31), 78-85.

Jeglum, J.K. & Scarratt, J.B. (1989). Forestry and forest-industry education in Finland. The Forestry Chronicle, 65(6), 405-413. doi: 10.5558/tfc65405-6

Kane, K., Chiru, C. & Ciuchete, S.G. (2012). Exploring the eco-attitudes and buying behaviour of Facebook users. Amfiteatru Economic Journal, XIV(31), 157-171.

Kangas, J. & Niemeläinen, P. (1996). Opinion of forest owners and the public on forests and their use in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 11(3), 269-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827589609382936

Kollmuss, A. & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260. doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401

Krasny, M.E., Kalbacker, L., Stedman, R.C & Russ, A. (2015). Measuring social capital among youth: applications in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 21(1), 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.843647

Mândruţ, O. (2008). Geography. Text book for the 10th grade. București: Corint. (In Romanian)

McCall, A.L. (2011). Promoting critical thinking and inquiry through maps in elementary classrooms. The Social Studies, 102, 132-138. doi: 10.1080/00377996.2010.538759

Medzini, A. (2012). The war of the maps: the political use of maps and atlases to shape national consciousness – Israel versus the Palestinian authority. European Journal of Geography, 3(1), 23-40.

Ministry of Education and Scientific Research (MECȘ in Romanian) (2015). The Geography curriculum for the national exam for a definitive degree in the educational system. Order no. 5558. București. (In Romanian)

Ministry of Education, Research and Innovation (MECI in Romanian) (2009). School Curriculum. Geography. The 5th to the 8th grade. Approved by the Ministerial Order No. 5097/09.09.2009. Annex no. 3. București. (In Romanian)

Ministry of Education, Research and Youth (MECT in Romanian) (2008). Geography, Geology. The curriculum of the national exam for a definitive degree and for obtaining the second didactic degree in the educational system. București. (In Romanian)

Ministry of Education, Research and Youth (MECT in Romanian) (2004). The National Council for Curriculum. The Geography school curriculum for the 9th grade. Approved by the Ministerial Order No. 3458/09.03.2004. București. (In Romanian)

Ministry of Education, Research and Youth (MECT in Romanian) (2004). The National Council for Curriculum. The Geography school curriculum for the 10th grade. Approved by the Ministerial Order No. 4598/31.08.2004. Annex 2. București. (In Romanian)

Ministry of Education, Research and Youth (MECT in Romanian) (2006). The National Council for Curriculum. The Geography school curriculum for the 11th grade (Fundamental problems of the contemporary world). Approved by the Ministerial Order No. 3252/13.02.2006. Annex 2. București. (In Romanian)

Ministry of Education, Research and Youth (MECT in Romanian) (2006). The National Council for Curriculum. The Geography school curriculum for the 12th grade (Europe-Romania-The European Union). Approved by the Ministerial Order No. 5959/22.12.2006. Annex 2. București. (In Romanian)

Ministry of Education, Research, Youth, and Sports (MECTS in Romanian). The National Centre for Assessment. The General Department for Education and Life-long Learning (2010). Annex no. 2 to OMECTS no. 5620/ 11.11.2010. The Contest for didactic vacant jobs in the pre-university system. The Geography Curriculum. București. (In Romanian)

Mutu, M., Bouriaud, L., Nichiforel, L., Drăgoi, M., Duduman, C. & Palaghianu, C. (2014). Forestry Engineers’ Perceptions of Vulnerability and Risks Characteristic of Forest Ecosystems and the Climate Change. Bucovina Forestieră, 14(1), 51-59. (In Romanian)

Neguţ, S., Apostol, G. & Ielenicz, M. (2000). The Geography of Romania. Text book for the 8th grade. București: Humanitas Educational. (In Romanian)

Neguţ, S., Ielenicz, M., Bălteanu, D., Neacşu, M.I. & Bărbulescu, A. (2006). Geography. Text book for the 11th grade. București: Humanitas Educational. (In Romanian)

Nichiforel, L. (2010). Forest owners’ attitudes towards the implementation of multi-functional forest management principles in the district of Suceava, Romania. Annals of Forest Research, 53(1), 71-80.

Niskanen, A. (ed.) (2006). Issues affecting enterprise development in the forest sector in Europe, University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry. Research Notes, 169, 406.

O’Brien, M.L. & Murray R. (2007). Forest School and its impacts on young children: case studies in Britain. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 249-265.

Pohle, P. (2013). Deforestation, environmental perception and rural livelihoods in Tropical Mountain forest regions of South Ecuador. In Borsdorf, A. (ed.) Forschen im Gebirge – Investigating the mountains – Investigando la montaña. Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 190-210.

Popescu, A.L. (2015). Protests against deforestation in Romania. Klaus Iohannis: “I think that the today protest is a legitimate one”, 9.05. Gandul.info, http://www.gandul.info/stiri/proteste-fata-de-defrisarile-din-romania-klaus-iohannis-cred-ca-protestul-de-astazi-este-perfect-legitim-14234300 (accessed on 16 January 2016). (In Romanian)

Popescu, M.P. (2004). Geography. Text book for the 9th grade. București: Aramis. (In Romanian)

Rădulescu, D.M. & Rădulescu, V. (2012). Ecological responsibility – part of sustainable development. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 1(6), 89-96.

Rebugio, L.L. & Camacho, L.D. (2005). Reorienting forestry education to sustainable forest management: the case of the university of the Philippines Los Banos College of Forestry and Natural Resources. Forest Science and Technology, 1(2), 193-198. doi: 10.1080/21580103.2005.9656287

Rickinson, R. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: a critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7(3), 207-320. doi: 10.1080/13504620120065230

Riedl, M. & Šišák, L. (2013). Analysis of the perceived condition of forests in the Czech Republic. Journal of Forest Science, 59(12), 514-519.

ROMSILVA. http://www.rosilva.ro/categorie.php?id=3 (accessed on 12 April 2016) (In Romanian)

Rotariu, T. & Iluț, P. (2006). The sociological inquiry and the survey. Iași: Editura Polirom. (In Romanian)

Rusu, E. (2012). Geography of Forests. Iaşi: Editura Universității Al. I. Cuza. (In Romanian)

Skorupski, M. (2012). Design of forestry education at the Faculty of Forestry, Poznañ University of Life Sciences. Studia i Materiały CEPL w Rogowie, R. 14. Zeszyt, 31, 63-71.

Stern, M.J., Powell, R.B. & Hill, D. (2014). Environmental education program evaluation in the new millennium: what do we measure and what have we learned? Environmental Education Research, 20(5), 581-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.838749

Tarrant, M.A. & Cordell, H.K. (2002). Amenity values of public and private forests: examining the value-attitude relationship. Environmental Management, 30(5), 692-703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2722-7

Taylor, P. (2000). Improving forestry education through participatory curriculum development: A case study from Vietnam. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 7(2), 93-104. doi: 10.1080/13892240008438810

Teplyakov, V.K. (1994). Forestry education in Russia. The Forestry Chronicle, 70(6), 700-703. http://pubs.cif-ifc.org/doi/abs/10.5558/tfc70700-6?journalCode=tfc

Tikka, P.M., Kuitunen, M.T. & Tynys, S.M. (2000). Effects of educational background on students' attitudes, activity levels, and knowledge concerning the environment. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(3), 12-19. doi: 10.1080/ 00958960009598640

Tuominen S., Pitkänen J., Balazs A., Korhonen K. T., Hyvönen P., Muinonen E. (2014). NFI plots as complementary reference data in forest inventory based on airborne laser scanning and aerial photography in Finland. Silva Fennica, 48(2), 983. http://dx.doi.org/10.14214/sf.983

Tuominen, S. & Haakana, M. (2005). Landsat TM imagery and high altitude aerial photographs in estimation of forest characteristics. Silva Fennica 39(4), 573-584.

Tuominen, S. & Haapanen, R. (2013). Estimation of forest biomass by means of genetic algorithm-based optimization of airborne laser scanning and digital aerial photograph features. Silva Fennica, 47(1), 902. http://dx.doi.org/10.14214/sf.902

Vaughan, C., Gack J., Solorazano, H. & Ray, R. (2003). The effect of environmental education on schoolchildren, their parents, and community members: a study of intergenerational and intercommunity learning. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(3), 12-21. doi: 10.1080/00958960309603489

Vorovencii, I., Ienciu, I., Oprea, L. & Popescu, C. (2013). Identification of illegal loggings in Harghita Mountains, Romania, using Landsat satellite images. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM. Surveying Geology & Mining Ecology Management, 2, 609-616.

We plant good deeds. http://plantamfaptebune.ro (accessed on 12 April 2016) (In Romanian)

Downloads

Published

2016-06-30

How to Cite

DULAMĂ, M. E., ILOVAN, O.-R., MAGDAŞ, I., & RĂCĂŞAN, B. S. (2016). IS THERE ANY FORESTRY EDUCATION IN ROMANIA? GEOGRAPHY TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS, ATTITUDES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Psychologia-Paedagogia, 61(1), 27–52. Retrieved from http://193.231.18.162/index.php/subbpsypaed/article/view/5460

Issue

Section

Articles