Students’ cognitive load in online education, under the lens of learning theories

Authors

  • Marius BĂNUȚ Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Corresponding author: marius.banut@ubbcluj.ro https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0955-2509
  • Daniel ANDRONACHE Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Corresponding author: marius.banut@ubbcluj.ro https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0351-2215

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbpsyped.2023.2.06

Keywords:

online learning, instructional design, cognitive load, information processing, learning theories

Abstract

There is a link between learning theories and online education in the sense that the use of certain e-Tools available in educational platforms could be biased by the epistemological beliefs of the teachers. The complexity of the educational message, in relation to the biased e-Tools selection for the learning task, together with the information processing that derives from the learning activity contributes to the intrinsic cognitive load. In order to optimize this cognitive load that can reach a high and an undesirable level for learning, this article aims to bridge online learning with the main theories of learning and cognitive load theory. The triangulation of these data, based on several sources from the specialized literature, provides an extended picture of the dominant cognitive processes determined by the tools used in the online learning space. This article could represent a source for the theoretical foundation of an online learning instructional design and for placing the online education closer to methodology, rather than technology.

ZUSAMMENFASUNG. Es besteht eine Verbindung zwischen Lerntheorien und Online-Bildung in dem Sinne, dass die Verwendung bestimmter auf Bildungsplattformen verfügbarer E-Tools durch die erkenntnistheoretischen Überzeugungen der Lehrer verzerrt sein könnte. Die Komplexität der sich daraus ergebenden pädagogischen Botschaft in Bezug auf die voreingenommene E-Tools-Auswahl trägt zusammen mit der Informationsverarbeitung, die sich aus der Lernaktivität ergibt und in direktem Zusammenhang mit den Lernzielen steht, zur intrinsischen kognitiven Belastung bei. Um diese kognitive Belastung zu optimieren, die ein hohes und für das Lernen unerwünschtes Niveau erreichen kann, zielt der Beitrag darauf ab, Online-Lernen mit Theorien zum Lernen und zur kognitiven Belastung zu verbinden. Die Triangulation dieser Daten, die aus verschiedenen Quellen der Fachliteratur entnommen wurden, liefert ein erweitertes Bild der vorherrschenden, nicht erschöpfenden kognitiven Prozesse, die durch die im Online-Lernraum verwendeten Tools bestimmt werden. Die neue Ausrichtung des Beitrags kann eine Inspirationsquelle für die Gestaltung von Lehrverfahren für das Online-Lernen sein, wobei die Online-Ausbildung eher mit der Methodik als mit der Technologie in Verbindung gebracht wird.

Schlüsselworte: Online-Lernen, Unterrichtsdesign, kognitive Belastung, Informationsverarbeitung, Lerntheorien

Author Biographies

Marius BĂNUȚ, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Corresponding author: marius.banut@ubbcluj.ro

Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Corresponding author: marius.banut@ubbcluj.ro

Daniel ANDRONACHE, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Corresponding author: marius.banut@ubbcluj.ro

Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Corresponding author: marius.banut@ubbcluj.ro

References

Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of social sciences, literature and languages, 1(1), 9-16.

Andronache, D. & Bănuț, M. (2021). Conjuncția teoriilor învățării cu educația online: între metodologie și tehnologie [Bridging learning theories with online education: Between methodology and technology]. In Ion Albulescu, Horațiu Catalano (coord.), e-Didactica. Procesul de instruire în mediul online, (pp. 137-176) Didactica Publishing House, București.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought & Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Ben-Jacob, M. G. (2017). Assessment: classic and innovative approaches. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 46-51. DOI: 10.4236/jss.2017.51004

Bruner, J.S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction, Cambridge: Belkapp Press.

Dao, D. V. (2020). Best practices for monitoring students’ cognitive load in online courses: A case study at a university in Iowa. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 7(2), 25-39.

Doolittle, P. E., & Hicks, D. (2003). Constructivism as a theoretical foundation for the use of technology in social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 31(1), 72-104. DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2003.10473216

Driscoll, M.P. (1994). Psychology of Learning for Instruction, Needham, Ma: Allyn & Bacon.

Temli Durmuș, Y. (2016). Effective Learning Environment Characteristics as a Requirement of Constructivist Curricula: Teachers' Needs and School Principals' Views. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 183-198. doi:10.12973/iji.2016.9213a

Flavell, J.H. (1992). Perspectives on perspective taking. In H. Beilin & P. Pufall (Eds.), Piaget’s theory: Prospects and possibilities, (pp. 107-139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Fontana, D. (1981). Psychology for Teachers, London: Macmillan/British Psychological Society.

Glava, C. (2009). Formarea competențelor didactice prin intermediul e-learning. Modele teoretice și aplicative [Teaching skills training through e-learning. Theoretical and applied models]. Editura Casa Cărții de Știință, Cluj-Napoca, România.

Green, S. K., & Gredler, M. E. (2002). A review and analysis of constructivism for school-based practice. School Psychology Review, 31(1), 53-70.

DOI: 10.1080/02796015.2002.12086142

Hamza, M. K., Alhalabi, B., & Marcovitz, D. M. (2000). Creative pedagogy for computer learning: eight effective tactics. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 32(4), 70-73.

Hrastinski, S. (2008). What Is Online Learner Participation? A Literature Review, în Computers & Education, 51(4), 1755-1765.

Huang, H. M. (2002). Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. British journal of educational technology, 33(1), 27-37.

Jensen, J. L., Phillips, A. J., & Briggs, J. C. (2019). Beyond Bloom’s: Students’ Perception of Bloom’s Taxonomy and its Convolution with Cognitive Load. Journal of Psychological Research, 1(1), 24-32.

Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23-31.

Kampylis, P., Berki, E. (2014). Nurturing creative thinking. Gonnet Imprimeur, Belley, France. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000227680

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.

Koper, R. (2014). Conditions for effective smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 1-17. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-014-0005-4

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Lehmann, J. A., & Seufert, T. (2018). Can music foster learning–effects of different text modalities on learning and information retrieval. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2305. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02305

Lewis, P. J. (2016). Brain friendly teaching - reducing learner's cognitive load. Academic radiology, 23(7), 877-880.

Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152-159.

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.

Mbati, L. A. (2012). Online learning for social constructivism: Creating a conducive environment. Progressio, 34(2), 99-119.

McLeod, S. (2018). Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. Simply Psychology, 18(3), 1-9. https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html

Mutlu-Bayraktar, D., Cosgun, V., & Altan, T. (2019). Cognitive load in multimedia learning environments: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 141, 103618.

Piaget, J. (1970). Main trends in psychology, London: George Allen & Unwin.

Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1973). Memory and intelligence, New York: Basic Books.

Piaget, J. (2008). Psihologia inteligenţei [Psychology of intelligence], Editura Cartier, București.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. In On the Horizon, 9(5), MCB University Press, UK.

Reed, A. J.; Bergemann, V. E. (1992), In the classroom: An introduction to education, Asheville, North Carolina: The Dushkin Publishing Group, Inc..

Russek, B. E., & Weinberg, S. L. (1993). Mixed methods in a study of implementation of technology-based materials in the elementary classroom. Evaluation and program planning, 16(2), 131-142. DOI: 10.1016/0149-7189(93)90024-3

Searle, J. R. (1990). Is the brain a digital computer?. In Proceedings and addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 64(3), 21-37. DOI: 10.2307/3130074

Sternberg, R.J. (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 269-287.

Sternberg, R.J.; Wagner, R.K.; Okagaki, L. (1993). Practical intelligence: The nature and role of tacit knowledge in work and at school. In J.M. Puckett & H.W. Reese (Eds.), Mechanisms of everyday cognition, (pp. 205-227). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Swan, K. (2005). A constructivist model for thinking about learning online. Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities, 6, 13-31.

Sweller, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Clark, R. E. (2007). Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: A reply to commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 115-121

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory and E-learning. In Artificial Intelligence in Education: 15th International Conference, AIED 2011, (pp. 5-6). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Auckland, New Zealand.

Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1-16.

Toraman, C., & Demir, E. (2016). The effect of constructivism on attitudes towards lessons: A meta–analysis study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(62). DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2016.62.8

Vîgotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Von Glasersfeld, E. (1985). Reconstructing the Concept of Knowledge. Archives de Psychologie, 53(204), 91-101.

Wilson, B., & Cole, P. (1991). A review of cognitive teaching models. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, 47-64.

Wong, W. L., Shen, C., Nocera, L., Carriazo, E., Tang, F., Bugga, S., ... & Ritterfeld, U. (2007). Serious video game effectiveness. In Proceedings of the international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology (pp. 49-55). DOI: 10.1145/1255047.1255057

Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and higher education, 10(1), 15-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.005

Downloads

Published

2023-12-22

How to Cite

BĂNUȚ, M., & ANDRONACHE, D. (2023). Students’ cognitive load in online education, under the lens of learning theories. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Psychologia-Paedagogia, 68(2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbpsyped.2023.2.06

Issue

Section

Articles