FREE CHOICE-FREE RELATIVE CLAUSES OF THE TYPE “INDIFERENT + WH-” IN ROMANIAN

Authors

  • Mihaela GHEORGHE Transilvania University in Brașov, nstitute of Linguistics „Iorgu Iordan – Alexandru Rosetti” of the Romanian Academy. E-mail: m.gheorghe@unitbv.ro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9880-5215

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2020.4.13

Keywords:

Romanian language, wh-items, free choice items (FCI), free relative clauses (FR), free choice - free relative clauses (FC-FR), complex free choice items.

Abstract

Free Choice-Free Relative Clauses of the Type Indiferent + Wh-” in Romanian. The hypothesis of this paper is that the inventory of the free choice items in Romanian can be extended by including, along with the indefinites and the wh- compounds with ori-, a complex structure consisting of the adverb indiferent (‘regardless’) plus a wh-item. Based on syntactic tests, the paper suggests a line of interpretation according to which two patterns of relative clauses are possible with indiferent followed by a wh-item: (i) a headed relative clause licenced by a PP (de) which is syntactically required by the adverb indiferent, and (ii) a pattern in which the preposition de is covert, and the adverb functions as a quantifier that takes scope over the relative node; the clause is adjoined to the matrix together with the adverbial. We are dealing, therefore, with a free relative endowed with the free choice semantics of the adverb. In contexts of this type, the adverb indiferent seems to act like an additive particle to the wh-items, in a semantically similar way in which the prefix ori- contributes to the meaning of the complex free choice wh-words in Romanian. This hypothesis is also supported by the fact that the group formed by indiferent + wh-items is also occurrent in constructions with the ellipsis of the VP in the relative clause, a fact that strengthens the parallelism with the free choice items available in Romanian.

REZUMAT. Relative libere de liberă alegere de tipul indiferent + wh-” în limba română. Lucrarea lansează o ipoteză privind extinderea inventarului de termeni de liberă alegere de care dispune limba română, prin includerea, alături de indefinitele și relativele compuse cu ori-, a unei structuri complexe, formate din adverbul indiferent și un grup relativ. Cu argumente sintactice ținând de mecanismul de formare a construcțiilor relative, se delimitează două tipare de subordonate: (i) un tipar care respectă regimul prototipic prepozițional al adverbului indiferent și prin care se pot forma relative integrate dependente de acesta prin intermediul prepoziției de și (ii) un tipar în care prepoziția nu se mai lexicalizează, permițând astfel adverbului să funcționeze ca un cuantificator ce ia extensie asupra nodului relativ; relativa astfel formată se adjoncționează în poziția unui adjunct. Avem de-a face, așadar, cu o relativă liberă, dar înzestrată, prin contribuția semantică a adverbului, cu sens de liberă alegere (concesiv). În contexte aparținând tipului (ii), adverbul indiferent pare să funcționeze în raport cu termenul relativ ca un aditiv semantic similar într-o oarecare măsură cu ori- din compusele indefinite. Această ipoteză este susținută și de faptul că, în același tipar sintactic, ocurențele independente ale grupului format din indiferent și un relativ sunt destul de numeroase (în construcții eliptice, fără un centru verbal în relativă), ceea ce pune și mai mult în lumină paralelismul cu formele pronominale de liberă alegere de care dispune limba.

Cuvinte-cheie: limba română, cuvinte relative, elemente lingvistice de liberă alegere (FCI), propoziții relative libere (FR), propoziții relative libere de liberă alegere (FC-FR), elemente complexe de liberă alegere.

Author Biography

Mihaela GHEORGHE, Transilvania University in Brașov, nstitute of Linguistics „Iorgu Iordan – Alexandru Rosetti” of the Romanian Academy. E-mail: m.gheorghe@unitbv.ro

Mihaela GHEORGHE is professor of linguistics at Transilvania University in Brașov, at the Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, and a senior researcher at the Institute of Linguistics „Iorgu Iordan – Alexandru Rosetti” of the Romanian Academy. Romanian syntax, mainly the syntax of relative clauses represents the area of her research interest. E-mail: m.gheorghe@unitbv.ro

References

a) corpus:

CoRoLa = Corpus de referință pentru româna actuală, available online at <http://corola.racai.ro>.

Romanian Web 2016 (roTenTen16) = Sketch Engine, available online at <https://www.sketchengine.eu>.

b) references:

Caponigro, Andrea, Fălăuș, Anamaria, 2017, “Free Choice Free Relative Clauses in Italian and Romanian”, in Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 36(2), p. 323-363.

Dayal, Veneeta, 1997, “Free Relatives and Ever: Identity and Free Choice Readings”, in Aaron Lawson and Eun Cho (eds), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT),7, Ithaca, CLC Publications, p. 99-116.

Dinică, Andreea, 2012, Pronumele şi adverbele nehotărâte în limba română, PhD Dissertation, Bucureşti, Universitatea din Bucureşti.

Fălăuș, Anamaria, 2015, “Romanian epistemic indefinites”, in Luis Alonso-Ovalle, Paula Menéndez-Benito (eds.), Epistemic Indefinites: Exploring modality beyond the verbal domain, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 60-81.

Farkas, Donka, 2013, “The semantics of determiners”, in Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin, Ion Giurgea (eds.), A Reference Grammar of Romanian, Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, p. 175-230.

Gheorghe, Mihaela, 2004, Propoziţia relativă, Piteşti-Bucureşti-Braşov, Editura Paralela 45.

Gheorghe, Mihaela, 2013, “Parametrul deplasării multiple a elementului WH (interogativ/relativ). Observaţii privind structurile cu grup interogativ/relativ multiplu în limba română veche”, in Limba română, 62(2), p. 240-246

Gheorghe, Mihaela, 2014, “Free relative clauses with quantificational reading in old Romanian”, in Iulian Boldea (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference Globalization, Intercultural Dialogue and National Identity: Language and Discourse, Târgu-Mureş, Arhipelag XXI Press, p. 17-22.

Giannakidou, Anastasia, Cheng, Lisa, 2006, “(In)Definiteness, Polarity, and the Role of wh-morphology in Free Choice”, in Journal of Semantics 23, p. 135-183.

Giannakidou, Anastasia, 2001, “The meaning of free choice”, in Linguistics and Philosophy, 24, p. 659-735.

Grosu, Alexander, Landman, Fred, 1998, “Strange Relatives of the Third Kind”, in Natural Language Semantics, 6, p. 125-170.

Grosu, Alexander, 1996, “The Proper Analysis of ‘Missing-p’ Free Relative Constructions”, in Linguistic inquiry, 27, p. 257-293.

Grosu, Alexander, 2013, “Relative Clause Constructions and unbounded dependencies”, in Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin, Ion Giurgea (eds), A Reference Grammar of Romanian, Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, p. 597-662.

Haspelmath, Martin, 1997, Indefinite Pronouns, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Hinterwimmer, Stefan, 2008, “Why Free Relatives Sometimes Behave as Indefinites”, in T. Friedman S. Ito (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT),18, Ithaca, CLC Publications, p. 411-428.

Iatridou, Sabine, Varlokosta, Spyridoula, 1998, “Pseudoclefts crosslinguistically”, in Natural Language Semantics, 6, p. 3-28.

Jacobson, Pauline, 1995, “The Quantificational Force of Free Relative Clauses”, in E. Bach et alii (eds.), Quantifiers in Natural Lanuages, vol. II, Dordrecht, Kluwer Accademic Publishers, p. 451-486.

Jayez, Jaques, Tovena, Lucia, 2005, “Free Choiceness and Non Individuation”, in Linguistics and Philosophy, 28(1), p. 1-71

Larson, Richard, 1987, “Missing prepositions’ and the analysis of English free relative clauses”, in Linguistic inquiry, 18, p. 239-266.

Lauer, Sven, 2009, “Free Relatives with -ever: Meaning and Use”, available at <http://www.stanford.edu/~svlauer/output/Lauer-EVER-free-relatives.pdf >.

Pană Dindelegan, Gabriela (ed.), 2013, The Grammar of Romanian, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Stan, Camelia, 2012, “Elemente de sintaxă diacronică: structurile interogative/relative multiple”, in Oana Chelaru-Murăruș, Maria Cvasnâi Cătănescu, Claudia Ene, Camelia Ușurelu, Rodica Zafiu (eds.), Text și discurs: omagiu Mihaelei Mancaș, București, Editura Universității din București, p. 433-437.

Sternefeld, Wolfgang, 2005, “Do Free Relative Clauses Have Quantificational Force?”, in H.-M. Gaertner, S. Beck, R. Eckardt, R. Musan, B. Stiebels (eds.), Between 40 and 60 Puzzles for Krifka, Between 40 and 60 Puzzles for Krifka, Berlin, Center for General Linguistics Typology and Universal Research (ZAS), available online at <http://www.zas.gwzberlin.de/publications/40-60-puzzles-for-krifka/pdf/sternefeld.pdf >.

Tovena, Lucia, Deprez, Viviane, Jayez, Jacques, 2005, “Polarity sensitive items”, in F. Corblin, H.tth de Swart (eds), Handbook of French semantics, Stanford, CSLI Publications.

Tredinnick, Victoria, 2005, “On the Semantics of Free Relatives with -Ever”, PhD Dissertation, Pennsylvania University, available online at <http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~victoria/diss-dbl.pdf>.

Vendler, Zeno, 1967, Linguistics in philosophy, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

Vlachou, Evanghelia, 2007, Free Choice in and out of Context: Semantics and Distribution of French, Greek and English Free Choice Items, PhD Dissertation, University of Utrecht, available online at <https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/21597/full.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y>.

Von Fintel, Kai, 2000, “Whatever”, in Brendan Jackson, Tanya Matthews (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT),10, p. 27–39, Ithaca, CLC Publications.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-30

How to Cite

GHEORGHE, M. (2020). FREE CHOICE-FREE RELATIVE CLAUSES OF THE TYPE “INDIFERENT + WH-” IN ROMANIAN. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia, 65(4), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2020.4.13

Issue

Section

Articles