Fake News and the Individual. Personal Characteristics Which Influence What We Choose to Believe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbpsyped.2024.1.03Keywords:
fake news, intelligence, personality, analytic thinking, emotionsAbstract
As the phenomenon of fake news continues to increase and spread throughout the world, there is a need to understand how individual characteristics influence the propensity to believe in fake news. In this systematic review, we performed a search of relevant databases for scientific studies published starting with 2016, the year this term became mainstream, 2024. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we selected ten studies, which showed that higher extraversion is related with an increased belief in fake news, while agreeableness, conscientiousness, and open-mindedness tend to protect against believing in fake news. A heightened state of emotionality (either negative or positive) is another individual characteristic which predisposes people to believe fake news. High intelligence individuals, but especially individuals with high analytical skills, who often use deep reflection (instead of their intuition/gut feeling) when processing information and making decisions, are the most protected when it comes to believing news that is not true.References
Ahmed, S., & Tan, H. W. (2022). Personality and perspicacity: Role of personality traits and cognitive ability in political misinformation discernment and sharing behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 196(111747), 111747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111747
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
Allport, F. H., & Lepkin, M. (1945). Wartime rumors of waste and special privilege: Why some people believe them. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 40, 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058110
Altemeyer, B. (2002). Dogmatic behavior among students: Testing a new measure of dogmatism. The Journal of Social Psychology,142(6), 713–721.
Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133.
Baron, J. (1985). Rationality and intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baron, J. (2018). Actively open‐minded thinking in politics. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.004
Bensch, D., Paulhus, D.L., Stankov, L., Ziegler, M., 2019. Teasing apart overclaiming, overconfidence, and socially desirable responding. Assessment 26 (3), 351–363.
Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 45–62.
Brandt, M. J., & Crawford, J. T. (2016). Answering unresolved questions about the relationship between cognitive ability and prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(8), 884–892.
Bronstein, M. V., & Cannon, T. D. (2017). Bias against disconfirmatory evidence in a large nonclinical sample: Associations with schizotypy and delusional beliefs. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology,8(1), 1–39.
Bronstein, M.V., Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Rand, D.G., Cannon, T. D. (2018). Belief in Fake News is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005
Brotherton, R.; French, C.C.; Pickering, A.D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Front. Psychol., 4, 279.
Brown, R.E., (2016). Hebb and Cattell: the genesis of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 606
Brzóska, P., Rosińska, K. (2020). Analysis of Individual Susceptibility of Social Media Users to Fake News: Polish Perspective. Studia Medioznawcze, September 2020.
Campitelli, G., & Gerrans, P. (2014). Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach. Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 434–447.
Calvillo, D. P., Garcia, R. J. B., Bertrand, K., & Mayers, T. A. (2021). Personality factors and self-reported political news consumption predict susceptibility to political fake news. Personality and Individual Differences, 174(110666), 110666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110666
Calvillo, D. P., Rutchick, A. M., & Garcia, R. J. B. (2021). Individual differences in belief in fake news about election fraud after the 2020 U.S. election. Behavioral Sciences, 11(12), 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11120175
Cerf, V.G. (2017), “Can liberty survive the digital age?”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 60 No. 5, p. 7.
Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., Parker, A., Denovan, A., & Parton, M. (2015). Conspiracy theory and cognitive style: A worldview. Fron-tiers in Psychology, 6, 206.
Davies, M. F. (1998). Dogmatism and belief formation: Output interference in the processing of supporting and contradictory cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 456.
De Neys, W. (2012). Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611429354
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual‐process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
Egelhofer, J.L., Lecheler, S., 2019. Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: a framework and research agenda. Ann. Int. Commun. Ass. 43 (2), 97–116.
Fiske, D.W., 1949. Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 44 (3), 329–344.
Flanagan, D.P., 2008. The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In: Reynolds, C.R., Fletcher-Janzen, E. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Special Education. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Forgas, J. P. (2019). Happy believers and sad skeptics? Affective influences on gullibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 306–313.
Forgas, J. P., & East, R. (2008). On being happy and gullible: Mood effects on skepticism and the detection of deception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1362–1367
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.
Garrett, R. K., & Weeks, B. E. (2017). Epistemic beliefs’role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation. PLoS ONE, 12, e0184733.
Goldberg, L.R., 1990. An alternative “description of personality”: the big-five factor structure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59 (6), 1216–1229.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.
Hebb, D.O., 1942. The effect if early and late brain injury upon test scores, and the nature of normal adult intelligence. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 85 (3), 275–292.
Jamieson, K.H., Cappella, J.N., 2008. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative media Establishment. Oxford University Press.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar,Straus and Giroux.
Kuklinski, J.H., Quirk, P.J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., Rich, R.F., 2000. Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. J. Polit. 62 (3), 790–816.
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K.M., Menczer, F., Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 9, 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W.G., Freund, A.M., Oberauer, K. and Krueger, J.I. (2013), “Misinformation, disinformation, and violent conflict: from Iraq and the “War on Terror” to future threats to peace”, American Psychologist, Vol. 68 No. 7, pp. 487-501.
Levine, E. E., Barasch, A., Rand, D., Berman, J. Z., & Small, D. A. (2018). Signaling emotion and reason in cooperation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 702–719.
Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3
Martin, N. (2008). Examination of the belief bias effect across two domains of reasoning (Master’s thesis). University of Waterloo.
Matthews, D. (2016). Do academic social networks share academics’ interests? Times Higher Education (THE). Retrieved March 28, 2023, from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/do-academic-social-networks-share-academics-interests
McDonald, K. Unreliable News Sites More than Doubled Their Share of Social Media Engagement in 2020. News Guard 2021. Available online: https://www.newsguardtech.com/special-report-2020-engagement-analysis/
McGrew, K.S., 2005. The Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory of Cognitive Abilities: Past, Present, and Future. In: Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues. The Guilford Press, pp. 136–181.
Mitchell, A.; Gottfried, J.; Stocking, G.; Walker, M.; Fedeli, S. Many Americans Say Made-Up News is a Critical Problem That Needs to Be Fixed; Pew Research Center: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. Available online: https://www.journalism.org/2019/06/05/manyamericans-say-made-up-news-is-a-critical-problem-that-needs-to-be-fixed/
Neuman, S. (2018), “France’s Macron says he wants law to combat fake news. The two-way: breaking news from NPR”, available at: www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/01/04/575580790/frances-macron-says-he-wants-law-to-combat-fake-news
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
Pariser, E., 2011. The Filter Bubble: what the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin, UK.
Parks, M. (2017), “Twitter bans ads from Russian state media, citing election interference efforts”, Tech Titans and the Information Complex, available at: www.npr.org/2017/10/26/560199026/twitter-endsrussian-state-media-advertisements-citing-2016-interference-efforts
Paulhus, D. L., Harms, P. D., Bruce, M. N., & Lysy, D. C. (2003). The over‐claiming technique: Measuring self‐enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 890–904. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.890
Pechey, R., & Halligan, P. (2011). The prevalence of delusion-like beliefs relative to sociocultural beliefs in the general population. Psychopathology, 44(2), 106–115.
Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Collins, E., & Rand, D. G. (2017). The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news stories increases perceived accuracy of stories without warnings. SSRN Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3035384
Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 47, 1865–1880. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465
Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015). On the reception and detection of pseudo‐profound bullshit. Judgment and Decision Making, 10, 549–563. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279
Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015a). Everyday consequences of analytic thinking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 425–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415604610
Pennycook, G., Ross, R. M., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2017a). Dunning‐Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1774–1784. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of Personality, 88(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12476
Rammstedt, B., Danner, D., 2017. Die Facettenstruktur des Big Five Inventory (BFI). Diagnostica 63, 70–84.
Schipolowski, S., Wilhelm, O., Schroeders, U., Kovaleva, A., Kemper, C., Rammstedt, B.,2014. Kurzskala Kristalline Intelligenz (BEFKI GC-K). Zusammenstellung Sozialwissenschaftlicher Items Und Skalen (ZIS)
Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025391
Silverman, C., & Singer-Vine, J. (2016). Most Americans who see fake news believe it, new survey says. BuzzFeed News. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/fake-news-survey.
Sindermann, C., Elhai, J. D., Moshagen, M., & Montag, C. (2020). Age, gender, personality, ideological attitudes and individual differences in a person’s news spectrum: how many and who might be prone to “filter bubbles” and “echo chambers” online? Heliyon, 6(1), e03214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03214
Sindermann, C., Schmitt, H. S., Rozgonjuk, D., Elhai, J. D., & Montag, C. (2021). The evaluation of fake and true news: on the role of intelligence, personality, interpersonal trust, ideological attitudes, and news consumption. Heliyon, 7(3), e06503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06503
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 342.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2007). Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(3), 225–247.
Svedholm, A. M., & Lindeman, M. (2013). The separate roles of the reflective mind and involuntary inhibitory control in gatekeeping paranormal beliefs and the underlying intuitive confusions. British Journal of Psychology, 104(3), 303–319.
Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition,133(3), 572–585.
Sydell, L. (2017), “How Russian Propaganda spreads on social media”, All Tech Considered, available at: https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2017/10/29/560461835/ how-russian-propagandaspreads-on-social-media
The International Cognitive Resource Team, 2014. Übersicht—International Cognitive Ability Resource—The ICAR Project. https://icar-project.com/.
Thomson, K. S., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2016). Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 99–113
Thurman, N., Schifferes, S., 2012. The future of personalization at news websites. Journal. Stud. 13 (5–6), 775–790.
Tupes, E.C., Christal, R.E., 1992. Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. J. Pers. 60 (2), 225–251.
Vargo, C.J., Guo, L., & Amazeen, M.A. (2018). The Agenda-Setting Power of Fake News: A Big Data Analysis of the Online Media Landscape From 2014 to 2016, New Media & Society, 20(5), 2028–2049. doi:10.1177/1461444817712086
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359, 1146–1151.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
Weeks, B. E. (2015). Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: How anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. Journal of Communication, 65, 699–719.
Wolverton, C., & Stevens, D. (2019). The impact of personality in recognizing disinformation. Online Information Review, 44(1), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-04-2019-0115
Zawadzki, J. A., Woodward, T. S., Sokolowski, H. M., Boon, H. S.,Wong, A. H. C., & Menon, M. (2012). Cognitive factors associated with subclinical delusional ideation in the general population. Psychiatry Research, 197(3), 345–349.
Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.J., Trilling, D., Meoller, J., Bod_o, B., De Vreese, C.H., Helberger, N., 2016. Should We Worry about Filter Bubbles? Internet Policy Review.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Psychologia-Paedagogia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
