ECONOMICS AND THE HUMANITIES. A SWOT ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Ioana-Gabriela NAN Faculty of Economics and Business Administration of Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Contact address: ioana.nan@econ.ubbcluj.ro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2019.2.07

Keywords:

economics, humanities, SWOT analysis, leadership, rhetoric, narrative, literature, language.

Abstract

Economics and the Humanities. A SWOT Analysis. According to some authors, economists and humanists have nothing in common, given the diametrically opposed intellectual approaches. In this article, I wish to probe the validity of that opinion by seeing whether “humanomics” departments (understood as the outposts of the humanities inside a field populated by economists) can make any positive contribution that both research areas may benefit from. In my description of the present state of the humanities in relation to economics, I will adopt a specific technique usually employed to analyse the state of a business organisation: its current strengths and weaknesses, but also the opportunities it should take advantage of and the threats it should try to avoid, in an attempt to see my own field with the clarity allowed by this particular economic research tool.

REZUMAT. Ştiinţele economice şi ştiinţele umaniste: o analiză SWOT. Potrivit unor autori contemporani, economiștii și umaniștii nu au nimic în comun, abordările lor intelectuale fiind diametral opuse. În acest articol, voi încerca să probez validitatea acestei opinii, discutând în ce măsură departamentele de științe „umanomice" (înțelese ca avanposturi ale științelor umaniste în teritorii populate de economiști) pot aduce contribuții pozitive, în beneficiul ambelor arii de cercetare. În descrierea situației actuale a științelor umaniste în relație cu științele economice, voi adopta o tehnică folosită de obicei în vederea analizării situației unei organizații de afaceri, respectiv punctele ei tari și punctele ei slabe, dar și oportunitățile de care ar putea profita și pericolele pe care ar trebui să le evite, în încercarea de a-mi privi propriul domeniu cu claritatea pe care o permite acest instrument de investigație specific economiștilor.

Cuvinte-cheie: științe economice, științe umaniste, analiză SWOT, leadership, retorică, narațiune, literatură, limbă.

Author Biography

Ioana-Gabriela NAN, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration of Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Contact address: ioana.nan@econ.ubbcluj.ro

Assistant lecturer Ioana-Gabriela Nan, Ph.D., is a member of the Department of Modern Languages and Business Communication at the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration of Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. She has been teaching practical courses in general and business English at several faculties of “Babeş-Bolyai” University, including the Faculty of Journalism and Public Administration, the Faculty of European Studies and the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, and preparation courses in English for international examinations such as Cambridge, TOEFL and IELTS. Her areas of interest include American literary journalism, creative writing and the history and philosophy of literature. Contact address: ioana.nan@econ.ubbcluj.ro

References

Arvidson, Sven P. 2008. Teaching Nonmajors. Advice for Liberal Arts Professors. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Bethke Elshtain, Jean. 2009. Leadership and the Humanities. In Leadership and the Liberal Arts. Achieving the Promise of a Liberal Education, ed. J. Thomas Wren, Ronald E. Riggio and Michael A. Genovese, 117-129. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bloom, Allan. 1987. The Closing of the American Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Bronk, Richard. 2009. The Romantic Economist. Imagination in Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Canterbery, Ray E. 2001. A Brief History of Economics. Artful Approaches to the Dismal Science. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

Dasgupta, Partha. 2007. Economics. A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ferrall, Victor E., Jr. 2011. Liberal Arts at the Brink. Cambridge, Mass., London, England: Harvard University Press.

Lanchester, John. 2018. “Can Economists and Humanists Ever Be Friends?”. The New Yorker (July 23). Online edition. <https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/07/23/can-economists-and-humanists-ever-be-friends>.

Mason, Jeff, and Peter Washington. 1992. The Future of Thinking. Rhetoric and the Liberal Arts Teaching. London: Routledge.

McCloskey, Deirdre N. 1998 (2nd ed.). The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.

McEachern, William A. 2006. Economics. A Contemporary Introduction. Mason, Ohio: Thomson South-Western.

Micu (Fekete), Adriana Corina. 2012. The Management of Change in Higher Education. PhD diss., Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca.

Morson, Gary Saul, and Morton Schapiro. 2017. Cents and Sensibility. What Economics Can Learn from the Humanities. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Steinberg, Theodore L. 2013. Literature, the Humanities, and Humanity. Geneseo: Open SUNY Textbooks, Milne Library, State University of New York.

Sykes, J.B., ed. 1982. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English. Bombay: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-24

How to Cite

NAN, I.-G. (2019). ECONOMICS AND THE HUMANITIES. A SWOT ANALYSIS. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia, 64(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2019.2.07

Issue

Section

Articles