Introduction to KNOWLEDGE-THAT/KNOWLEDGE-HOW: BETWEEN PHENOMENOLOGY AND ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY – Thematic Dossier

Authors

  • Adrian LUDUŞAN Faculty of European Studies, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: adiludusan@gmail.com.
  • Mihai RUSU Lecturer PhD, Faculty of Philosophy, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca; Department of Environmental Engineering and Protection, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: mihaimcrusu@gmail.com. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7112-6987

Abstract

The ongoing debate surrounding know-how and skill is one of the most animated and diverse areas of contemporary philosophy. In fact, the inquiry is hardly limited to philosophical theories and arguments, as inputs from cognitive psychology and neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, and other fields have been regularly called upon and analyzed in the literature. Moreover, the range of philosophical theories and traditions that have been brought to bear on the debate is unusually vast, stretching from the ancient to the most novel, and from classical analytic philosophy to various strands of continental philosophy, of which the phenomenological tradition has probably been appealed to the most, whether to lend support to, or to criticize a certain idea.

References

Copoeru, I., and A. Ludușan. “We will figure it out. Know-how, hybrid ways, and communicative (inter)actions.” Studia UBB Philosophia 64.3 (2020): 33-50.

Dreyfus, H. L., and S. E. Dreyfus. “From Socrates to expert systems: the limits and dangers of calculative rationality.” In Philosophy and Technology II: Information Technology and Computers in Theory and Practice, by Carl Mitcham and Alois Huning (eds), 111-130. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1986.

Dreyfus, S. E., and H. L. Dreyfus. “A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition.” University of California Berkeley Operations Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 1980.

Felix, C. “Intellectualism about Knowledge How and Slips.” Studia UBB Philosophia 64.3 (2020): 11-31.

Gallagher, S., and B. Aguda. “Anchoring know-how: Action, affordance and anticipation.” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 27.3-4 (2020): 3-37.

Groenendijk, J., and M. Stokhof. Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Amsterdam: Phd Dissertation, 1984.

Marquez Sosa, C. M. “Mediational Fields and Dynamic Situated Senses.” Studia UBB Philosophia 64.3 (2020): 51-72.

Miranda Medina, J. F. “Rethinking Knowledge-that and Knowledge-how: Performance, Information and Feedback.” Studia UBB Philosophia 64.3 (2020): 73-98.

Ryle, G. The Concept of Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1949.

Stanley, J., and J. W. Krakauer. “Motor skill depends on knowledge of facts.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7 (2013): 503.

Stanley, J., and T. Williamson. “Knowing How.” Journal of Philosophy, 98.8 (2001): 411-444.

Stanley, J., and T. Williamson. “Skill.” Noûs, 51.4 (2017): 713-726.

STUDIA UBB PHILOSOPHIA, Volume 65 (LXV), No. 3, December 2020

Downloads

Published

2020-12-20

How to Cite

LUDUŞAN, A. ., & RUSU, M. . (2020). Introduction to KNOWLEDGE-THAT/KNOWLEDGE-HOW: BETWEEN PHENOMENOLOGY AND ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY – Thematic Dossier. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia, 65(3), 7 –. Retrieved from http://193.231.18.162/index.php/subbphilosophia/article/view/2700

Issue

Volume 65, No. 3, December 2020

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.