Kultúrák és lelkiségek törésvonalán

Authors

  • Lehel LÉSZAI Egyetemi docens, Református Tanárképző és Zeneművészeti Kar, Babeș–Bolyai Tudományegyetem, Koloszvár, Románia. Email: lehel.leszai@ubbcluj.ro. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5874-3654

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbtref.68.1.03

Keywords:

Samaritan, Jew, Jesus, well, Gerizim

Abstract

At the Crossroads of Cultures and Spiritualities. In the Gospel of John, Chapter 4, we read of a peculiar encounter. A Samaritan woman meets a Jewish rabbi at a rather unusual time of the day at a well. It is a difficult task to have a clear picture of who the Samaritans were exactly, but we may assume three theories about them. The first approach is connected to the view of how the Samaritans perceive themselves. They see themselves as the true Israel and everyone else as heretics. Their own Torah inherited from Moses is the genuine one, and the others have just falsified it. The second approach belongs to the Judeans. They regard as valid what we can read in the Jewish Old Testament, in the Second Book of Kings, Chapter 17, verses 24–41. According to this view, the Samaritans’ origin can be traced back to the Mesopotamian immigrants. Some Israelites mixed with pagans. After their return from the Babylonian captivity, the Jews refused to rebuild the Temple together with the Samaritans. This led to the building of a new temple by the Samaritans, and hence tensions arose between Jews and Samaritans. The third view can be called the scientific approach. According to this, there was no disruption in the 5th century BC between Samaritans and Jews. Assyrians settled the Samaritans. The Jews looked at them with suspicion because of their ethnic and mainly religious background. The actual drifting apart became obvious in the 2nd century BC and after their temple was destroyed. The Samaritans worked on their own Pentateuch and had their own priesthood, and these facts became a fundamental difference between them. Since then, the Jews have regarded Samaritans as pagans and as their enemies. In John 4, at the beginning, the woman sees in the man a traditional enemy, but her attitude slowly changes. She is not sure if her conversational partner is greater than Jacob, who was their highly esteemed predecessor. At a certain point of their discussion, the unnamed woman calls the rabbi “Sir” and regards him as a prophet. The woman has strong doubts about Jesus being the Christ to come and whom the Samaritans have been expecting. At the end of this conversation, the woman changes her attitude, speaks without hindrance about the young rabbi, and recognizes with her fellow villagers that this is the long-expected Saviour. The woman’s openness is remarkable, who is not stuck with her predefined ideas but is ready to listen carefully to the man whom at first she identified as her enemy. In this Gospel, we can read many stories. One of them is Nicodemus, who is not entirely sure about what Jesus asks of him. Jesus’s disciples are often perplexed and confused when their Master speaks to them. Here we can read of a woman who understands Jesus and recognizes Christ in him. She does not merely believe in Jesus but becomes a missionary among her fellow Samaritans. There is a huge difference between them at the beginning, but they slowly start to approach each other, and the woman is converted in the end. Her life is helped and influenced dramatically and existentially by the patience and understanding of Jesus.

References

ANDERSON, Robert T. – Terry, GILES, (2002): The Keepers. An Introduction to the History and Culture of the Samaritans. Peabody (Massachusetts), Hendrickson Publishers.

(2005): Tradition Kept. The Literature of the Samaritans. Peabody (Massachusetts), Hendrickson Publishers.

(2012): The Samaritan Pentateuch. An Introduction to Its Origin, History, and Significance for Biblical Studies. SBL Number 72. Atlanta, Society of Biblical Literature.

ASHTON, John (22017): Understanding the Fourth Gospel. Second edition. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

AUGUSTINE (2006): Tractates on the Gospel of John 15.12. NPNF 1 14:108–9. In: Elowsky, Joel C. (szerk.): John 1–10. Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture. New Testament IVA. Downers Grove (Illinois), InterVarsity Press.

BECKING, Bob (2007): Do the Earliest Samaritan Inscriptions Already Indicate a Parting of the Ways? In: Lipschits, Oded – Knoppers, Gary N. – Albertz, Rainer (szerk.) Judah and the Judeans in the Fourth Century B.C.E. Winona Lake, Indiana, Eisenbrauns.

BENNEMA, Cornelis (22014): Encountering Jesus. Character Studies in the Gospel of John. Second edition. Fortress Press, Minneapolis.

BEN-ZVI, Jizhak (1992): The Origin of the Samaritans and Their Tribal Divisions, In: Dexinger, Ferdinand – Pummer, Reihard (szerk.): Die Samaritaner. Wege der Forschung. Band 604. Darmstadt, Wissentschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

BOLYKI János (2001): „Igaz tanúvallomás”. Kommentár János evangéliumához. Kommentárok a Szentíráshoz. Budapest, Osiris Kiadó.

BOTHA, J. Eugene (1991): Jesus and the Samaritan Woman. A Speech Act Reading of John 4:1–12. Supplements to Novum Testamentum, Vol. LXV. Leiden – New York – Kopenhága – Köln, E. J. Brill.

BOWMAN, John (1975): The Samaritan Problem. Studies in the Relationship of Samaritanism, Judaism, and Early Christianitye. Ford. Alfred M. Johnson, Jr. Pittsburgh Theological Monograph Series 4. Pittsburgh (Pennsylvania), The Pickwick Press.

(szerk.) (1977): Samaritan Documents Relating to Their History, Religion and Life. Ford. John Bowman. Pittsburgh Original Texts and Translation Series 2. Pittsburgh (Pennsylvania), The Pickwick Press.

CALVIN, John (1994): John. The Crossway Classic Commentaries. Wheaton (Illinois) – Nottingham (England), Crossway Books.

CHIBICI-REVNEANU, Nicole (2007): Die Herrlichkeit des Verherrlichten. Der Verständnis der do,xa im Johannesevangelium. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament, 2. Reihe. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck. 231.

COGGINS, R. J. (1975): Samaritans and Jews. The Origins of Samaritanism Reconsidered. Growing Points in Theology. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

COHICK, Lynn (2017): The “Woman at the Well”: Was the Samaritan Woman Really an Adulteress? In: Glahn, Sandra L. (szerk.): Vindicating the Vixens. Revisiting Sexualized, Vilified, and Marginalized Women of the Bible. Grand Rapids (Michigan), Kregel Publications.

CULPEPPER, R. Alan (1983): Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel. A Study in Literary Design. Foundation and Facets: New Testament. Philadelphia, Fortress Press.

(1998): The Gospel and Letters of John. Interpreting Biblical Texts. Nashville, Abingdon Press.

FARMER, Craig S. (szerk.) (2014): John 1–12. Reformation Commentary on Scripture. New Testament IV. Downers Grove (Illinois), InterVarsity Press.

FELDMAN, Louis H. (1996): Studies in Hellenistic Judaism. Arbeiten zur Geschichte des Antiken Judentums und des Urchristentums XXX. Leiden – New York – Köln, E. J. Brill.

HJELM, Ingrid (2000): The Samaritans and Early Judaism. A Literary Analysis. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 303. Copenhagen International Seminar 7. Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield.

(2004): Jerusalem’s Rise to Sovereignty. Zion and Garizím in Competition. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 404. Copenhagen International Seminar 14. London – New York, T&T Clark International.

HORST, Pieter W. van der (2006): Jews and Christians in Their Greco-Roman Context. Selected Essays on Early Judaism, Samritanism, Hellenism, and Christianity. Wissentschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 196. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.

KARTVEIT, Magnar (2009): The Origin of the Samaritans. Supplements to Vetus Testamentum Vol. 128. Leiden – Boston, Brill.

KNOPPERS, Garry N. (2012): Samaritan Conceptions of Jewish Origin and Jewish Conceptions of Samaritan Origins: Any Common Ground? In: Frey, Jörg – Schattner-Rieser, Ursula –Schmid, Konrad (szerk.): Die Samaritaner und die Bibel. The Samaritans and the Bible. Historische und literarische Wechselwirkungen zwischen biblischen und samaritanischen Traditionen. Historical and Literary Interactions between Biblical and Samaritan Traditions. Studia Judaica Band 70. Studia Samaritana Band 7. Berlin – Boston, De Gruyter.

(2013): Jews and Samaritans. The Origins and History of Their Early Relations. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

KOK, Jacobus (Kobus) (2017): New Perspectives on Healing, Restoration and Reconciliation in John’s Gospel. Biblical Interpretation Series, Vol. 149. Leiden – Boston, Brill.

MALICK, David E. (2018): Narrative Art & Women in the Gospels and Acts. Selected Studies in the New Testament Narratives. Eugene (Oregon), Wipf & Stock Publishers.

MÁTYÁS Ernő (1950): János evangélioma. Írásmagyarázat. A Sárospataki Kollégium Kiadványai. Dolgozatok a bibliai theologiai tudományok köréből. 2. Sárospatak, Sylvester.

MOLONEY, Francis J. (1998): The Gospel of John. Sacra Pagina Series, Vol. 4. A Michael Glazier Book. Collegeville (Minnesota), The Liturgical Press.

MOR, Menachem (1989): The Samaritans and the Bar-Kokhbah Revolt, In: Crown, Alan D. (szerk.): The Samaritans. Tübingen, J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

MORGENSTERN, Matthew (2010): hrwtb tvlwvmh hkrbh The Hebrew, Aramaic and Arabic Versions of the Samaritan Pentateuch, In: Mor, Menachem – Reiterer, Friedrich V. (szerk.): Samaritans: Past and Present. Current Studies. Studia Judaica Band 53, Studia Samaritana Band 5. Berlin – New York, De Gruyter.

MOSER, Marion (2014): Schriftdiskurse im Johannesevangelium. Eine narrativ-intertextuelle Analyse am Paradigma von Joh 4 und Joh 7. Wissentschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament, 2. Reihe. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck. 380.

NODET, Étienne (1997): A Search for the Origins of Judaism. From Joshua to the Mishnah. Ford. Ed Crowley. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 248. Sheffield, Sheffield Academic Press.

(2010): Samaritains, Juifs, Temples. Cahiers de la Revue Biblique 74. J. Pende, Gabald et Cie Éditeurs.

(2011): Israelites, Samaritans, Temples, Jews, In: Zsengellér József (szerk.): Samaria, Samarians, Samaritans. Studies on Bible, History and Linguistics. Studia Judaica Band 66. Studia Samaritana Band 6. Berlin – Boston, De Gruyter.

(2014): Editing the Bible: Alexandria or Babylon? In: Thompson, Thomas L. – Wajdenbaum, Philippe (szerk.): The Bible and Hellenism. Greek Influence on Jewish and Early Christian Literature. Copenhagen International Seminar. Durham, Acumen.

PUMMER, Reinhard (2016): The Samaritans. A Profile. Grand Rapids (Michigan) – Cambridge (U.K.), William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

(2004): Die Vokale des Gesetzes. Die samaritanische Lesetradition als Textzeugin der Tora. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft Band 339. Berlin – New York, Walter de Gruyter.

SCHORCH, Stefan (2011): The Samaritan Version of Deuteronomy and the Origin of Deuteronomy, In: Zsengellér József (szerk.): Samaria, Samarians, Samaritans. Studies on Bible, History and Linguistics. Studia Judaica, Band 66. Studia Samaritana, Band 6. Berlin – Boston, De Gruyter.

SCHUR, Nathan (1989): History of the Samaritans. Beitrage zur Erforschung des Alten Testaments und des Antiken Judentums, Band 18. Frankfurt am Main – Bern – New York – Párizs, Peter Lang.

TASKER, R. V. G. (1992): The Gospel According to St. John. An Introduction and Commentary. Tyndale New Testament Commentaries. Leicester (England), Inter-Varsity Press – Grand Rapids (Michigan), William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

TSEDAKA, Benyamim (2017): Understanding the Israelite-Samaritans from Ancient to Modern. Jerusalem, Carta Jerusalem.

WAHLDE, Urban C. von (2010): The Gospel and Letters of John. Volume 2. Commentary on the Gospel of John. The Eerdmans Critical Commentary. Grand Rapids (Michigan) – Cambridge (U.K.), William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

ZANGENBERG, Jürgen (1994): SAMAREIA. Antike Quellen zur Geschichte und Kultur der Samaritaner in deutscher Übersetzung. Texte und Arbeiten zum neutestamentlichen Zeitalter 15. Tübingen – Basel, Francke Verlag.

ZUMSTEIN, Jean (2008): Évangile Selon Jean. Introduction et traduction de Jean Zumstein. Collection Sources. Paris, Presses Univesitaires de France, Fondation Martin Bodmer.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

LÉSZAI , L. (2023). Kultúrák és lelkiségek törésvonalán. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica, 68(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbtref.68.1.03

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)